Skip to main content
Log in

A field study of the effect of prebaiting on censusing by the capture-recapture method in a vole population

  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Summary

Populations of the vole,Clethrionomys rufocanus, in a lowland woodlot of Hokkaido were studied for the presence of effects of prebaiting on censusing by the capture-recapture method. A grid of 121 live-traps, spaced 5 m apart, was laid out on each of two plots, one of which alone was prebaited three days long. Owing to very high densities and great trap-efficiency, sufficient and favourable samples could be available for statistical analysis, except the trend of delayed catch for young in sampling. The population on either plot, however, proved to be markedly variable in catchability of unmarked animals in the course of trapping; while the probability of recapture was counted as invariable on the average from day to day, the recapture frequency was different between juveniles, subadults and adults. Needless to say, the catchability was distinctly greater for marked voles than for unmarked ones, whether prebaited or not, through the trapping period, except that the first-day catchability for unmarked ones on the prebaited plot seems not to be significantly lower than that for marked ones.

Consequently, it turns out that the prebaiting has almost never helped to eliminate the important bias induced by differential trap-response of marked and unmarked animals; its contribution is only that the catchability for unmarked ones is slightly higher on the part of the prebaited plot on earlier days of the period.

In accordance with the heterogeneous catchability, the Γ-form distribution analogous to the geometric could be applied with thorough fitness to the capture frequency in order to estimate the whole populations. The fact that the estimates are reliable, being not at any rate underestimates, was further confirmed by the result of a follow-up work conducted by means of the removal method with wider trap-spacing which brought forth distinct underestimation chiefly referable to unexposure to traps of the partial populations. The subject of unexposure was discussed by laying stress on the relation between minimum range length and trap-spacing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrzejewski, R., J. Babińska, E. Bock andJ. Gliwicz (1968) Results of rodent trapping using cheese and fried wick baiting.Small Mamm. Newsletters,2: 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babińska J. andE. Bock (1969) The effect of prebaiting on captures of rodents.Acta Theriol.,4: 267–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, D. andD. A. Kempson (1949) Prebaiting small mammals and a new design of live trap.Ecology,30: 536–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, L., T. J. Peterle andR. Schofield (1963) Problems in a rabbit population study.Wildl. Monogr.,10, 51pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, L. (1969) Population estimates from recapture frequencies.J. Wildl. Mgt.,33: 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. R. andL. Eberhardt (1967) Estimating cottontail abundance from live-trapping data.J. Wildl. Mgt.,31: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, A. D. (1955) Trap response of the cottontail rabbit and its effect on censusing.J. Wildl. Mgt.,19: 467–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz, L. L. (1961) Responses of small mammals to live-traps and weather conditions.Amer. Midl. Nat.,66: 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodziński, W., Z. Pucek andL. Ryszkowski (1966) Estimation of rodent numbers by means of prebaiting and intensive removal.,Acta Theriol.,11: 297–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J.J. (1962) Trap response of confined cottontail populations.J. Wildl. Mgt.,26: 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, G.M. (1965) Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model.Biometrika,52: 225–247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori, M. andR. Tanaka (1968) Studies on population ecology of the vole,Microtus montebelli, in mountain grasslands of of Sugadaira and its adjacent areas. I. Results of research on five populations in 1966–1967.Bull. Sugadaira Biol. Lab., Tokyo Kyoiku Univ.,2: 17–40. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. (1966) Demographic changes in fluctuating populations ofMicrotus californicus.Ecol. Monogr.,36: 239–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, P. H., D. Chitty andH. Chitty (1953) The estimation of population parameters from data obtained by means of the capture-recapture method. III. An example of the practical application of the method.Biometrika,40: 137–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, C. M., W. R. Edwards andL. Eberhardt (1967) Estimating squirrel abundance from livetrapping data.J. Wildl. Mgt.,31: 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1965) A note in the multiple-recapture census.Biometrika,52, 249–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skellam, J. G. (1948) A probability distribution derived from the binomial distribution by regarding the probability of success as variable between the sets of trials.J. Royal Stat. Soc. B,10: 257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickel, L. F. (1954) A comparison of certain methods of measuring ranges of small mammals.J. Mamm.,33: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, R (1963) On the problem of trap-response types of small mammal populations.Res. Popul. Ecol.,5: 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, R. (1966) A possible discrepancy between the exposed and the whole population depending on range-size and trap-spacing in vole populations.Res. Popul Ecol.,8: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, R. andM. Kanamori (1967) New regression formula to estimate the whole population for recapture-addicted small mammals.Res. Popul. Ecol.,9: 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, R. andM. Kanamori (1969) Inquiry into effects of prebaiting on removal census in a vole population.Res. Popul. Ecol.,11: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanton, M. T. (1965) Problems of live-trapping and population estimation of the wood mouse,Apodemus sylvaticus.J. Anim. Ecol. 34: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueda, M., S. Higuchi, B. Igarashi, M. Maeda, T. Kuwabata, K. Ota, H. Abe, Y. Fujimaki, J. Fujikura andT. Takayasu (1966) Historical review of studies on theBedford’s red-backed vole,Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae (Thomas).Bull. Governm. For. Exper. Stat. (Japan),191, 100pp. (in Japanese).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution from JIBP-PT No. 88, carried out by the grant from the expenditure of Education Department to the specific study on “Dynamics of Biosphere”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, R. A field study of the effect of prebaiting on censusing by the capture-recapture method in a vole population. Res Popul Ecol 12, 111–125 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511086

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511086

Keywords

Navigation