Researches on Population Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 188–197 | Cite as

The role of medium conditioning in the population dynamics of the housefly

  • Edwin H. Bryant
  • Augusta E. Hall


The role of larval medium conditioning on the behavior of larvae and of ovipositing adults of the housefly,Musca domestica L., was investigated through behavioral preference tests. Larvae were strongly attracted to medium conditioned by themselves or other larvae, while adult females overwhelmingly oviposited in fresh medium. Medium conditioning occurs within a few hours after hatching of an egg cohort and is effective in preventing overcrowding of a single site by shutting off further oviposition within 24 hours after eggs are initially deposited. A model of medium conditioning optimizes density for developing larvae and could also provide for regulation of local larval populations.


Larval Density Oviposition Site Musca Domestica Population Cage Conditioning Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barton Browne, L., R. J. Bartell andH. H. Shorey (1969) Pheromone mediated behavior leading to group oviposition in the blowflyLucilia cuprina.J. Insect Physiol. 15: 1003–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumberger, J. P. (1919) A nutritional study of insects with special relation to microorganisms and their substrata.J. Experimental Zool. 28: 1–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant, E.H. (1969) The fates of immatures in mixtures of two housefly strains.Ecology 50: 1049–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, E. H. (1970) The effect of egg density on hatchability in two strains of the housefly.Physiol. Zool. 43: 288–295.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, E. H. andR. R. Sokal (1967) The fate of immature housefly populations at low and high densities.Res. Popul. Ecol. 9: 19–44.Google Scholar
  6. Bryant, E. H. andR. R. Sokal (1968) Genetic differences affecting the fates of immature housefly populations at two densities.Res. Popul. Ecol. 10: 140–170.Google Scholar
  7. Crumb, S. E. andS. C. Lyon (1917) The effect of certain chemicals upon oviposition in the housefly (Musca domestica L).J. Econ. Ent. 10: 532–536.Google Scholar
  8. Crumb, S. E. andS. C. Lyon. (1921) Further observations on the effect of chemicals upon oviposition in the housefly.J. Econ. Ent. 14: 461–465.Google Scholar
  9. Dawood, M. M. andM. W. Strickberger. (1969) The effect of larval interaction on viability inDrosophila melanogaster. III. Effects of biotic residues.Genetics 63: 213–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dowding, V. M. (1967) The function and ecological significance of the pharyngeal ridges occurring in the larvae of some cyclorrhaphous diptera.Parasitol. 57: 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrman, L. (1966) Mating success and genotypic frequency inDrosophila.Animal Beh. 14: 332–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrman, L., (1969) the sensory basis of mate selection inDrosophila.Evolution 23: 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, S. L., M. Singh andK. Kojima (1968) A study of frequency-dependent selection observed in the esterase-6 locus ofDrosophila melanogaster using a conditioned media method.Genetics 68: 97–604.Google Scholar
  14. Kalandadze, L. P. andS. V. Chiligarov (1942) The role of substrates in the oviposition and preimaginal development ofMusca vicina Macq.Med. Parasit. 11: 105–112.Google Scholar
  15. Kence, A. (1973) The effects of variation in larval development on laboratory population ofTribolium and houseflies. Ph. D. Thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook. 184 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Kleiman, D. (1966) Scent marking in the Canidae.Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 18: 161–177.Google Scholar
  17. Lewontin, R. C. (1955) The effects of population density and composition on viability inDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 9: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewontin, R. C. andY. Matsuo (1963) Interaction of genotypes determining viability inDrosophila busckii.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci (Wash) 49: 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Muller, C. H. (1966) The role of chemical inhibition (allelopathy) in vegetation composition.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 93: 332–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muller, C. H. (1969) Allelopathy as a factor in ecological process.Vegetatio 18: 348–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Park, T. (1934) Studies in population physiology. III. The effect of conditioned flour upon the productivity and population decline ofTribolum confusum.J. Experimental Zool. 68: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Park, T. (1936) Studies in population physiology. VI. The effect of differentially conditioned flour upon fecundity and fertility ofTribolum confusum Duval.J. Experimental Zool. 73: 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park, T. andN. Wollcott (1937) Studies in population physiology. VII. The relation of environmental conditioning to the decline ofTribolum confusum populations.Physiol. Zool. 2: 197–211.Google Scholar
  24. Ralls, K. (1971) Mammalian scent marking.Science 171: 443–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Richardson, C. H. andE. H. Richardson (1922) Is the housefly in its natural environment attracted to carbon dioxide?J. Econ. Ent. 15: 425–430.Google Scholar
  26. Shorey, H. H. (1973) Behavioral responses to insect pheromones.Ann. Rev. Ent. 18: 349–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sokal, R. R. andF. J. Rohlf (1969)Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco. 776 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Sullivan, R. L. andR. R. Sokal (1963) The effects of larval density on several strains of the housefly.Ecology 44: 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valiela, I. (1969) An experimental study of mortality factors of larvalMusca autumnalis De Geer.Ecological Monogr. 39: 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Webber, L. G. (1955) The relationship between larval and adult size of the Australian blowflyLucilia cuprina Weid.Australian J. Zool. 3: 346–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weisbrot, D. R. (1966) Genotypic interctions among competing strains and species ofDrosophila.Genetics 53: 527–435.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Population Ecology 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edwin H. Bryant
    • 1
  • Augusta E. Hall
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Population Biology, Department of BiologyUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations