Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying population units that comply with capture-recapture assumptions in an open community of alpine grasshoppers

  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Summary

Population units which are homogeneous with respect to capture-recapture assumptions are identified by applying 11 contingency table tests to grasshopper data according to various site, species, growth stage and sex groupings. The results of 2337 contingency table analyses have permitted a definition of the biological, spatial and temporal characteristics of those groupings which were found to be homogeneous. The same analyses suggest that dispersal rates and dispersal patterns pose the greatest single difficulty in defining population homogeneity within an open community. The effects of failures in capture-recapture assumptions are discussed in relation toJolly’s 1965 stochastic model.

A more detailed presentation of the study is available from the author on request.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, B. M. andC. Horst (1966)Supplement to tables for testing significance in a 2×2 contingency table. i+28 pp. Cambridge Univ. Press.

  • Bigelow, R. S. (1967)The grasshoppers (Acrididae) of New Zealand: their taxonomy and distribution. 112 pp+40 plates. Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. A. andP. M. Sheppard (1973) An evaluation of two capture-recapture models using the technique of computer simulation. pp. 235–252 inThe mathematical theory of the dynamics of biological populations (ed.M. S. Bartlett andR. W. Hiorns), Academic Press, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brussard, P. F. andP. R. Ehrlich (1970) The population structure ofErebia epipsodea (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae)Ecology 51: 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, A. D. (1971) An examination and extension of Leslie’s test of equal catchability.Biometrics 27: 615–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, A. D. (1973b) The effects of unequal catchability on Jolly-Seber estimates.Biometrics 29: 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, A. D. (1973b) Capture-recapture methods applied to a population with known parameters.J. Anim. Ecol.,42: 125–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. (1954) Some methods for strengthening the common χ2 tests.Biometrics 10: 417–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M. (1964) Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals.Biometrika 51: 429–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M. (1966) A test for equal catchability.Biometrics 22: 330–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M. (1968) The statistics of capture-recapture methods.Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 6: 455–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M. (1972) The logic of capture-recapture estimates.Biometrics 28: 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, L. L. (1969) Population estimates from recapture frequencies.J. Wildl. Mgmt 33: 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, D. J., R. Latscha, B. M. Bennett, P. Hsu, andE. S. Pearson. (1963)Tables for testing significance in a 2×2 contingency table. vi+103 pp Cambridge Univ. Press.

  • Fisher, R. A. (1958)Statistical methods for research workers. 13th edition. 356 pp. Oliver & Boyd. Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. O. (1973) Approximations of the bias in theJolly-Seber capture-recapture model.Biometrics 29: 501–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, L. C. (1970) Identification of the immature stages of New Zealand alpine acridid grasshoppers (Orthoptera).Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z. (Biol. Sciences) 12: No. 17, 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W. R. andD. C. Grant (1966) Estimates of population density and dispersal in the naticid gastropod,Polinices duplicatus, with a discussion of computational methods.Biol. Bull 131: 292–307.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, T. K. Kamimura andM. Watanabe (1973) A quantitative analysis of dispersal in a horsefly,Tabanus iyoensis Shiraki and its application to estimate the population size.Res. Popul. Ecol. 14: 209–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwao, S. (1963) On a method for estimating the rate of population interchange between two areas.Res. Popul. Ecol. 5: 44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, G. M. (1965). Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration—stochastic model.Biometrika. 52: 225–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leyton, M. K. (1968) Rapid calculation of exact probabilities for 2×3 contingency tables.Biometrics. 24: 714–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J. (1970) A simulation study of animal population estimation using the capturerecapture method.J. appl. Ecol. 7: 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G. G. (1970) A regression method for mark-recapture estimation of population size with unequal catchability.Ecology. 51: 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, M. J., T. J. Gaskell andB. J. George (1968) Caputre-recapture methods of estimating animal numbers.J. Biol. Educ. 2: 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D. A. (1973) On the accuracy of some mark-recapture estimators.Oecologia. 12: 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1965) A note on the multiple-recapture census.Biometrika. 52: 249–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1973)The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. xii+506pp Griffin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, P. M. W. W. Macdonald, R. J. Tonn andB. Grab (1969) The dynamics of an adult population ofAedes aegypti in relation to dengue haemorrhagic fever in Bangkok.J. Anim. Ecol. 38: 661–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanton, M. T. (1969) The estimation and biology of populations of the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus (Schr.)) and wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus (L.))J. Anim. Ecol. 38: 511–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, E. G. (1970) A self-checking coding technique for mark-recapture studies.Bull. ent. Res. 60: 303–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, E. G. (1971a) A versatile FORTRAN computer program for the capture-recapture stochastic model ofG. M. Jolly.J. Fish. Res. Bd Canada. 28: 443–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. G. (1971b)A computer program for capture-recapture studies of animal populations: a FORTRAN listing for the stochastic model of G. M. Jolly.N.Z. Tussock Grassld Mount. Lands Inst. Spec. Pub.8: 33pp+Addendum Pp i–xiii.

  • White, E. G. (1974a) A quantitative biology of three New Zealand alpine grasshopper species.N.Z.J. Agr. Res. 17: 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E.G. (1974b) Grazing pressures of grasshoppers in an alpine tussock grassland.N.Z. J. Agr. Res. 17: 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. G. (1975) A “jump net” for capturing grasshoppersN.Z. Entomologist.6.

  • White, E. G. (in press) A survey and assessment of grasshoppers as herbivores in the South Island alpine tussock grasslands of New Zealand.N. Z. J. Agr. Res. 18.

  • White, E. G. andR. N. Watson (1972) A food consumption study of three New Zealand alpine grasshopper species.N.Z. J. Agr. Res. 15: 867–877.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, E.G. Identifying population units that comply with capture-recapture assumptions in an open community of alpine grasshoppers. Res Popul Ecol 16, 153–187 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511058

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511058

Keywords

Navigation