Advertisement

Specific-lon electrode determinations of sulfide preconcentrated from San Francisco Bay waters

  • Davison V. Vivit
  • James W. Ball
  • Everett A. Jenne
Article

Abstract

Measurements of low-level dissolved-sulfide concentrations in estuarine water from San Francisco Bay have been made using the sulfide-specific electrode after preservation, separation, and preconcentration of the sulfide species. The separation and preconcentration were acheived by coprecipitation of ZnS with Zn(OH)2 followed by collection and dissolution of the precipitate, giving concentration factors up to 160-fold Preconcentration provided sulfide solutions that were adequately measurable within the practical working range of the specific-ion electrode The sulfide detection limit with the preconcentration step is 0 02 μg/l Spike recoveries in the range of 81 to 10 1% have been achieved for laboratory-prepared samples having S2− concentrations as low as 0 6 μg/l and 84 to 100% for an estuarine sample spiked in the field with 2 μg/l (S(−II) Positive correlations have been found between dissolved S(−II) concentrations and concentrations of dissolved Cd, Cu, and Ni, negative correlations have been found between bisulfide (HS) activity and activities of Cd2+, Cu2+, and Ag+ species

Keywords

Sulfide Methylene Blue Zinc Acetate Polysulfide Estuarine Water 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation, 1971, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 13th edition: Washington, D.C., American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, J. W., E. A. Jenne, and D. K. Nordstrom, 1979, WATEQ2—A computerized chemical model for trace and major element speciation and mineral equilibria of natural waters,in Jenne, E. A., ed., Chemical modeling in aqueous systems Speciation, sorption, solubility and kinetics: Washington, D C., American Chemical Society Symposium Series, no 93, p. 815–835Google Scholar
  3. Ball, J. W., D. K. Nordstrom, and E. A. Jenne, 1980, Additional and revised thermochemical data and computer code for WATEQ2—A computerized chemical model for trace and major element speciation and mineral equilibria of natural waters: Menlo Park, California, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations 78-116, 109 pGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, J. W., E. A Jenne, and M W Cantrell, 1981, WATEQ3—A geochemical model with uranium added: Menlo Park, California, U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 81-1183, 81 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumann, E. W., 1974, Determination of parts per billion sulfide in water with the sulfide-selective electrode: Analyt Chem., v 46, p. 1345–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bella, D A., 1972, Environmental considerations for estuarine benthal systems: Water Res, v 6, p. 1409–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bella, D A., 1975, Tidal flats in estuarine water quality analysis: EPA-660/3-75-025, 186 pGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulegue, J, and G Michard, 1979, Sulfur speciations and redox processes in reducing environments,in Jenne, E A., ed, Chemical modeling in aqueous systems. Speciation, sorption, solubility and kinetics: Washington, D C., American Chemical Society Symposium Series, no. 93, p 25–50Google Scholar
  9. Brown, E., M. W. Skougstad, and M J Fishman, 1970, Methods for collection and analysis of water samples for dissolved minerals and gases,in Techniques of water-resources investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, v 5: Washington, D C, U S. Government Printing Office, p 1–160Google Scholar
  10. Colby, P. I., and L. L. Smith, 1967, Survival of walleye eggs and fry on paper fiber sludge deposits on Rainy River, Minnesota: Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., v. 96, p. 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davison, W., and C. D. Gabutt, 1979, Potarographic methods for measuring uncomplexed sulfide ions in natural waters: J. Electroanalyt. Chem., v. 99, p. 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilboa-Garber, N., 1971, Direct spectrophotometric determination of inorganic sulfide in biological materials and in other complex mixtures: Analyt. Biochem., v. 43, p. 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Girvin, D. C., A. T. Hodgson, M. E. Tatro and R. N. Anaclerio, Jr., 1978, Spatial and seasonal variations of silver, cadmium, copper, nickel, lead, and zinc in South San Francisco Bay water during two consecutive drought years: Berkeley, California, Energy and Environment Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California, 117 p.Google Scholar
  14. Gulens, J., and B. Ikeda, 1978, Effects of surface heterogeneity on the sensitivity of sulfide ion-selective electrodes: Analyt. Chem., v. 50, p. 782–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey, H. W., 1966, The chemistry and fertility of sea waters, second edition: London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hem, J. D., 1970, Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water, second edition: Washington, D. C., Geological Survey Water Supply paper 1473, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  17. Jenne, E. A., D. C. Girvin, J. W. Ball, and J. M. Burchard, 1978, Inorganic speciation of silver in natural waters—Fresh to marine,in Klein, D A., ed., Environmental impacts of nucleating agents used in weather modification programs: Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 256 p.Google Scholar
  18. Mackereth, F J. H., J. Heron, and J. F. Talling, 1978, Water analysis: Some revised methods for limnologists: Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication No. 36. Ambleside, England, 120 p.Google Scholar
  19. Orion Research, 1970, Instruction manual for sulfide ion electrode and silver ion electrode, model 94-16: Cambridge, Massachusetts, Orion Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Orion Research, 1977, Instruction manual for sulfide electrode and silver ion electrode, model 94-16: Cambridge, Massachusetts, Orion Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Pomeroy, R., 1954, Auxiliary pretreatment by zinc acetate in sulfide analyses: Analyt. Chem., v. 26, p 571–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, R. E., and R. E. Herndon, 1980. Physical and chemical properties of San Francisco Bay waters, 1977. U S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 80-1191, 51 p.Google Scholar
  23. Szekeres, L., 1974, Analytical chemistry of the sulfur acids: Talanta, v. 21, p. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davison V. Vivit
    • 1
  • James W. Ball
    • 2
  • Everett A. Jenne
    • 3
  1. 1.Branch of Analytical Laboratories Geologic DivisionU S Geological SurveyMenlo Park
  2. 2.Water Resources DivisionU S Geological SurveyMenlo Park
  3. 3.Battelle Pacific Northwest LaboratoriesRichland

Personalised recommendations