Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 187–202 | Cite as

Factor prices and labour productivity in the canadian manufacturing industries

  • P. S. Rao
Article

Abstract

The primary objective of this paper is to get an estimate of the degree of substitutability and complementarity between factors of production. These measures would assist greatly in assessing the ultimate impact of energy and raw material prices on labour productivity, and hence on living standards. For this purpose, we have estimated the four factor share equations (capital, labour, energy and materials) for 22 manufacturing industries. For each industry, we have estimated the factor share equations with and without the assumption of homotheticity. The following are some of the important findings:
  1. 1)

    For all the manufacturing industries the assumption of homotheticity is rejected. This implies that factor proportions are affected by the level of output, independent of factor prices.

     
  2. 2)

    For majority of the industries, with the exception of capital, all the own-price elasticities are below unity. Moreover, the energy and material price elasticities are quite small.

     
  3. 3)

    In general our results imply that energy is a good substitute for both capital and labour and a complement to materials. Even in the case of energy intensive manufacturing industries, only for the chemicals and chemical products industries, the substitution elasticity between energy and capital is negative and significant (complementarity).

     

Keywords

Labour Productivity Price Elasticity Factor Price Labour Productivity Growth Substitution Elasticity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, R. G. D.: Mathematical Analysis for Economists. London 1938.Google Scholar
  2. Berndt, E. R.: The Internal Structure of Functional Relationships: Separability, Substitution and Aggregation. Review of Economic Studies40, 1973, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berndt, E. R., andL. Christensen: The Translog Function and the Substitution of Equipment, Structures, and Labour in U.S. Manufacturing, 1929–1968. Journal of Econometrics1, 1973, 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berndt, E. R., andD. Wood: The Technology, Prices, and the Derived Demand for Energy. Review of Economics and Statistics57, 1975, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berndt, E. R., M. A. Fuss andL. Waverman: A Dynamic Model of Costs of Adjustments and Interrelated Factor Demands, with an Empirical Application to Energy Demand in U.S. Manufacturing, EPRI, Final Report, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Blain, L.: Recent Developments in Aggregate Labour Productivity. Bank of Canada Review, 1977, 3–15.Google Scholar
  7. Burgess, D. F.: Duality Theory and Pitfalls in the Specification of Technologies. Journal of Econometric,3, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Carmicheal, E. A.: Reassessing Canada's Potential Economic Growth. The Conference Board in Canada, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. C.D. Howe Research Institute: Policy Review and Outlook, 1979: Anticipating the Unexpected.Google Scholar
  10. Christensen, L. R., D. Jorgenson andL. Lau: Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers. Review of Economics and Statistics55, 1973, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diewert, W. E.: An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leonties Production Function. Journal of Political Economy79, 1971, 481–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuss, M. A.: The Demand for Energy in Canadian Manufacturing. Journal of Econometrics5, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. Fuss, M. A., andL. Waverman: The Demand for Energy in Canada. Working Paper, Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. Griffin, J. M.: The Effects of Higher Prices on Electricity Consumption. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. Griffin, J. M., andP. R. Gregory: An Intercountry Translog Model of Energy Substitution Responses. American Economic Review, 1976, p. 66.Google Scholar
  16. Hudson, E. A., andD. W. Jorgenson: U.S. Energy Policy and Economic Growth, 1975–2000. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1974.Google Scholar
  17. Humphrey, D. B., andA. Toeves: Factor Costs and Factor Use: An Analysis of Labour Capital and Natural Resource Inputs. Southern Economic Journal44 (2), 1977, 222–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Humphrey, D. B., andJ. R. Morney: Substitution among Capital, Labour, and Natural Resource Products in American Manufacturing. Journal of Political Economy83, 1975.Google Scholar
  19. McRae, R. N.: Regional demand for Energy by Canadian Manufacturing Industries. Canadian Energy Research Institute, Working Paper 78-7.Google Scholar
  20. Norsworthy, J. R., andHarper: The Role of Capital Formation in the Recent Slowdown in Productivity Growth. Working Paper 87, U.S. Department of Labour, Bureau of Labour Statistics, 1979.Google Scholar
  21. Ostry, S., andP. S. Rao: Productivity Trends in Canada. Paper presented at the Conference on Lagging Productivity Growth, Toronto, May 24, 1979.Google Scholar
  22. Parks, R. W.: Price Responsiveness of Factor Utilization in Swedish Manufacturing 1890–1950. The Review of Economics and StatisticsLII (2), 1971, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pindyck, R. S.: Interfuel Substitution and the Industrial Demand for Energy: an International Comparison. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1979.Google Scholar
  24. Rao, P. S.: An Econometric Analysis of Labour Productivity in Canadian Industries. Economic Council of Canada, Discussion Paper No. 125, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. Rao, P. S.: An Econometric Analysis of Labour Productivity in Canadian Industries: Some Further Results. Economic Council of Canada, Discussion Paper, No. 134, 1979.Google Scholar
  26. Samuelson, P. A.: Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge 1947.Google Scholar
  27. Shephard, R. W.: Cost and Production Functions. Princeton 1953.Google Scholar
  28. Sims, H., andJ. Stanton: Recent Changes in Patterns of Productivity Growth in Canada. Unpublished paper, Department of Finance, Canada, 1980.Google Scholar
  29. Tatom, J. A.: Energy Prices and Capital Formation: 1972–1977. Federal Reserve Bank of St. St. Louis, May 1979.Google Scholar
  30. Uzawa, H.: Production Functions with Constant Elasticities of Substitution. Review of Economic Studies29, 1962, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zellner, A. M.: An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of American Statistical Association57, 1962, 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. S. Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Economic Council of CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations