Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 398–401 | Cite as

Quantitative computed tomography for measuring bone mineral density in athletes

  • H. Dinç
  • G. Savci
  • A. Demirci
  • M. Y. Sadikoĝlu
  • E. Tuncel
  • H. Yavuz
Clinical Investigations


We studied the effect of different training patterns on vertebral trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD) in male athletes using quantitative computed tomography. Vertebral trabecular (t) and cortical (c) BMDs of the first three lumbar vertebrae were measured using single energy quantitative computed tomography in 51 athletes including 10 weight lifters (mean age 20 years), 13 soccer players (mean age 27 years), 28 wrestlers (mean age 17 years), and 45 age-matched volunteers (mean age 21 years). Measured BMDs were correlated with age, body height and weight, training hours per week, sports years, and type of physical activity. Vertebral tBMDs were found to be 44%, 23%, and 24% higher in the weight lifters, soccer players, and wrestlers, respectively, compared with the volunteers. The corresponding cBMDs were 18%, 6%, and 11% higher than that of volunteers. There was significant correlation between the trabecular and cBMD, and height of the athletes, sports years, training hours per week, and physical activity. The most significant correlation with BMD was the type of physical activity. Both the height of the subjects and physical activity variables showed variations of 47% and 32% in trabecular and cBMD, respectively. According to the multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) only the physical activity factor was effective, with a significance level ofP<0.01; the other factors and interactions were not effective (P>0.05) on trabecular and cBMD. Different training patterns have a different anabolic effect on both trabecular and cBMDs of the vertebrae, and this effect is more pronounced on the trabecular compartment. Weight lifting showed the highest anabolic effect on both trabecular and cBMDs compared with soccer playing and wrestling. Of the independent variables, physical activity showed the highest anabolic effect on the vertebrae. These results may have implications for devising exercise strategies to reduce the possibility of fracture in old age.

Key words

Osteoporosis Athletes Quantitative computed tomography 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (1986) Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 25:1676–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rodysill KJ (1989) Postmenopausal osteoporosis—intervention and prophylaxis. A review. J Chron Dis Met 40:743–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith EL, Raab DM (1984) Osteoporosis and physical activity. Acta Med Scand 711:149–156Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zylstra S, Hopkins A, Erk M, Hreshchyshyn MM, Anbar M (1989) Effect of physical activity on lumbar spine and femoral neck bone densities. Int J Sports Med 10:181–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Roe TF, Loro ML, Sayre JW, Goodman WG (1994) Geneder differences in vertebral body sizes in children and adolescents. Radiology 190:673–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolman RL, Faulmann DML, Clark P, Hesp R, Harries MG (1991) Different training patterns and bone mineral density of the femoral shaft in elite, female athletes. Ann Rheum Dis 50:487–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stillman RJ (1987) Physical activity and skeletal health: a brief survey. Med Sport Sci 24:1–12Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aisenbrey JA (1987) Exercise in the prevention and management of osteoporosis. Phys Ther 67:1100–1104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lang P, Steiger P, Faulkner K, Glüer C, Genant HK (1991) Osteoporosis: current techniques and recent developments in quantitative bone densitometry. Radiol Clin N Am 29:49–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Genant HK, Block JE, Steiger P, Glüer CC, Ettinger B, Harris ST (1989) Appropriate use of bone densitometry. Radiology 170:817–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grampp S, Jergas M, Glüer CC, Lang P, Brastow P, Genant HK (1993) Radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis: current methods and perspectives. Radiol Clin N Am 31:1133–1145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cann CE (1988) Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review. Radiology 66:509–522Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steenbeek JCM, Kuijk CV, Grashuis JL (1992) Influence of calibration materials in single- and dual-energy quantitative CT. Radiology 183:849–855PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guglielmi G, Grimston SK, Fischer KC (1994) Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. Radiology 192:845–850PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Louis O, Lopez P, Klotz E, Osteaux M, Fraga J (1989) Reference values for trabecular and cortical vertebral bone density in single and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 9:75–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melton LJ III, Eddy DM, Johnston CC (1990) Screening for osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 112:516–528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Christiansen C (1992) Bone loss and bone mass as indicators of osteoporosis. Hospimedica April:44–48Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Genant HK, Glüer C-C, Lotz JC (1994) Gender differences in bone density, skeletal geometry, and fracture biomechanics. Radiology 190:636–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krall EA, Dawson-Hughes B (1993) Heritable and life-style determinants of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 8:1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meier DE, Orwoll ES, Jones JM (1984) Marked disparity between trabecular and cortical bone loss with age in healthy men. Ann Intern Med 101:605–612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Compston JE, Evans D, Crawley EO, Evans C (1988) Bone mineral content in normal UK subjects. Br J Radiol 61:631–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McCormick DP, Ponder SW, Fawcett HD, Palmer JL (1991) Spinal bone mineral density in 335 normal and obese children and adolescents: evidence for ethnic and sex differences. J Bone Miner Res 6:507–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith EL, Gilligan C (1991) Physical activity effects on bone metabolism. Calcif Tissue Int 49:50–54Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rikh RE, McManis BG (1990) Effects of exercise on bone mineral content in postmenopausal women. Res Quart Exer Sport 61:243–249Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    McCulloch RG, Bailey DA, Houston CT, Dodd BL (1990) Effects of physical activity, dietary calcium intake and selected lifestyle factors on bone density in young women. Can Med Assoc J 142:221–227Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dalsky GP, Stocke KS, Ehsani AA, Slatopolsky E, Lee WC, Birge SJ (1988) Weight-bearing exercise training and lumbar bone mineral content in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 108:824–828PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Dinç
    • 1
  • G. Savci
    • 2
  • A. Demirci
    • 1
  • M. Y. Sadikoĝlu
    • 2
  • E. Tuncel
    • 2
  • H. Yavuz
    • 3
  1. 1.KTU Medical School, Department of RadiologyKTU Farabi HospitalTrabzonTurkey
  2. 2.Medical School, Department of RadiologyUludaĝ UniversityBursaTurkey
  3. 3.KTU Foresty FacultyBioistatisticantTrabzonTurkey

Personalised recommendations