Abstract
The conversion of R&D into commercial new products has long been considered a basic tenet of industrial innovation and competitiveness. This paper describes the key variables that affect the successful commercialization of new technologies in industrial companies. Drawing on the authors' own research and consulting experience with hundreds of US and foreign companies, the paper examines the more effective practices, identifies key barriers and problem areas, and provides some conclusions and implications for practicing managers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Geisler, E. “Key Output Indicators in Performance Evaluation of Research and Development Organizations.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change 47(2), 1994, pp. 12–20.
Geisler, E.. “When Whales Are Cast Ashore: The Conversion to Relevancy of U.S. Basic Research and Universities.”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 41(1), February, 1995, pp. 3–8.
Geisler, E.. “An Integrated Cost-Performance Model of Research and Development Evaluation.”Omega 23(3), 1995, pp. 281–294.
Geisler, E. “Integrated Figure of Merit of Public Sector Research Evaluation.”Scientometrics 30(3), 1996, pp. 379–395.
Geisler, E. “Intersector Technology Cooperation: Hard Myths, Soft Facts.”Technovation, 1997 (forthcoming).
Geisler, E., and C. Clements.Commercialization of Technology From Federal Laboratories: The Effects of Barriers, Incentives and the Role of Entrepreneurship. Final Report to the National Science Foundation, University of Wisconsin, Whitewater, 1995.
Geisler, E., and W. Drago. “Managing Professionals in Interorganizational Cooperative Research Alliances.”Engineering Management Journal 8(4), 1996, pp. 43–50.
Geisler, E., A. H. Rubenstein, and P. Sattler. “Measuring the Outputs from University-Industry Interactions: Some Findings from an Empirical Study.”Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Management of Technology, Miami, FL, 1994.
Gemunden, H., T. Ritter, and P. Heyderbreck. “Network Configuration and Innovation Success: An Empirical Analysis in German High-Tech Industries.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 13(4), 1996, pp. 449–462.
Knapp, C.The Role of Key Communicators in a Divisionalized Industrial Corporation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University, 1983.
Kostoff, R.The Handbook of Research Impact Assessment, 6th ed. Fort Belvoir, VA: Office of Naval Research, DTIC Report No. ADA296021, 1996.
Kramer, S.. “The Art of Selling Your R&D Ideas.”Research Management 24(2), 1981, pp. 7–8.
McGrath, M., and E. Eldred. “Commercializing New Technology.”Research/Technology Management 40(2), March–April 1997, pp. 29–33.
McGrath, M., and M. Romeri. “The R&D Effectiveness Index: A Metric for Product Development Performance.”The Journal of Product Innovation Management 11(3), 1994, pp. 213–220.
Nayak, R.. “Measuring Product Creation Effectiveness.”Journal of Business Strategy 13(1), 1992, pp. 48–52.
Prasad, L., and A. H. Rubenstein. “Factors Influencing Power and Organizational Politics During New Product Development.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 10(3), 1993, pp. 221–236.
Robb, W.. “How Good is Our Research?”Research/Technology Management 34(2), 1991, pp. 16–21.
Rubenstein, A. H. “Field Studies of Project Selection Behavior in Industrial Laboratories.” InOperations Research in Research and Development, ed. B. V. Dean. New York: Wiley, 1963, pp. 189–206.
Rubenstein, A. H.Managing Technology in the Decentralized Firm. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1989.
Rubenstein, A. H. “Barriers to Successful Technical Entrepreneurship in the Large Firm: Some Case Studies.” presented atThe Institute of Management Sciences National Meeting, Philadelphia, October, 1990.
Rubenstein, A. H.. “At the Front End of the R&D/Innovation Process: Idea Development and Entrepreneurship.”International Journal of Technology Management 8 (5/6/7), 1994, pp. 652–677.
Rubenstein, A. H.. “Trends in Technology Management Revisited.”IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 41(4), 1994a, pp. 335–341.
Rubenstein, A. H., and R. Avery. “Idea Flow in Research and Development.” InProceedings of the National Electronics Conference, Vol. 14, October 1958.
Rubenstein, A. H.. “University-Industry Romance.”R&D Innovator 12(1), 1995, pp. 12–16.
Rubenstein, A. H., C. Douds,et al., “Management Perceptions of Government Incentives to Technological Innovations in England, France, West Germany and Japan.”Research Policy 6(4), 1977, pp. 324–357.
Rubenstein, A. H., and E. Geisler. “Evaluating the Outputs and Impacts of R&D/Innovation.”International Journal of Technology Management 6(5/6/7), 1991, pp. 181–204.
Rubenstein, A. H., E. Geisler, and A. Cowan. “Patents, Licensing, and Cases in Transfer of Agricultural Technology to Industry.”Proceedings of the Technology Transfer Society International Symposium. Washington, DC: 1983, pp. 102–111.
Rubenstein, A. H., and M. Radnor. “Top Management's Role in Research Planning in Large Decentralized Companies.”Proceedings of the IFORS, Oslo, Norway: July 1963.
Sen, F., and A. H. Rubenstein. “External Technology and In-House R&D's Facilitative Role.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 6(3), 1989, pp. 181–200.
Souder, W., and A. Nashar. “A Technology Selection Model for New Product Development and Technology Transfer.”Advances in Global High Technology Management 5, 1995, pp. 225–244.
Tidd, J., J. Bessant, and K. Pavitt.Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Organizational and Market Change. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
Werner, B., and W. Souder. “Measuring R&D Performance—State of the Art.”Research/Technology Management 40(2), 1997, pp. 34–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rubenstein, A.H., Geisler, E. & Abeysinghe, R. Industrial practices of research conversion and technology transfer. J Technol Transfer 22, 49–56 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509162
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509162