Abstract
This paper examines the role that basic research plays in the strategies pursued by industry in their interactions with federal labs. It draws on questionnaire-based data of 229 federal laboratory-industry joint R&D projects with 219 companies and 27 laboratories. The study documents the relative importance of basic research in the success of the interactions by comparing the incidence of basic research on several indicators of success. The study shows that, even though projects involving basic research tend to have higher costs, they also have a high percentage of product outputs in the short term. Typical high payoff strategies for partnership were those in which the company performed several technical roles and the federal laboratory was more narrowly focused.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batelle Columbus Laboratories.Interactions of Science and Technology in the Innovative Process: Some Case Studies. Columbus: Battelle Columbus Laboratories, 1973.
Bozeman, Barry. “Evaluating Government Technology Transfer: Early Impacts of the Cooperative Technology Paradigm.”Policy Studies Journal 22, 1994, pp. 322–340.
Bozeman, Barry. “Commercialization of Federal Laboratory Technology: Results of a Study of Industrial Partners.” Paper presented at Oak Ridge National Laboratory Research Seminar, July 10, 1995.
Bozeman, Barry, and Maria Papadakis. “Company Interactions with Federal Laboratories: What They Do and Why They Do It.”Journal of Technology Transfer 20(3–4), 1995, pp. 64–74.
Bozeman, Barry, Maria Papadakis, and Karen Coker.Industry Perspectives on Commercial Interactions with Federal Laboratories. Report to the National Science Foundation. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 1995.
Bozeman, Barry, and Michael Crow.U.S. R&D Laboratories and their Environments: Public and Market Influence. Report prepared for the National Science Foundation. Syracuse, NY: Technology and Information Policy Program, 1988.
Bozeman, Barry, and Michael Crow.Limited by Design: Policies for Public Laboratories in the U.S. Columbia University Press, forthcoming.
Bozeman, Barry, and Dennis Wittmer. “Technical Roles, Technical Range and Success of Federal Laboratory-Industry Partnerships.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Social Study of Science, Bielefeld, Germany, October 1996.
Bozeman, Barry, and Jeffrey Straussman.Public Management Strategies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
Bozeman, Barry, and David Roessner. “Prototype Case Studies for R&D Value Mapping Assessment of Basic Research Impacts.” Report to Sandia National Laboratories, 1996.
Joly, P. B., and V. Mangematin. “Profile of Public Laboratories, Industrial Partnerships and Organization of R&D: The Dynamics of Industrial Relationships in a Large Research Organization.”Research Policy 25(5), 1996, pp. 901–922.
Hameri, Ari-Pekka. “Technology Transfer between Basic Research and Industry.”Technovation 16(2), February 1996, pp. 51–57.
Hameri, Ari-Pekka, and Olli Vuola. “Using Basic Research as a Catalyst to Exploit New Technology-Based Innovations—A Case Study.”Technovation 16(10), October 1996, pp. 531–539.
Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute.Technology in Retrospect and Critical Events in Science. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 1968.
Lee, Yong. “‘Technology Transfer’ and the Research University: A Search for the Boundaries of University-Industry Collaboration.”Research Policy 25, 1996, pp. 843–863.
Link, Albert. “On the Classification of Industrial R&D.”Research Policy 25, 1996, pp. 397–401.
Liyanage, Shantha, and Helen Mitchell. “Strategic Management of Interactions at the Academic-Industry Interface.”Technovation 14(10), October 1994, pp. 641–655.
Mansfield, Edwin. “Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing.”American Economic Review 70, 1980, pp. 863–873.
Mansfield, Edwin, and Jeong-Yeon Lee. “The Modern University: Contributor to Industrial Innovation and Recipient of Industrial R&D Support.”Research Policy 25, 1996, pp. 1047–1058.
Miyata, Yukio. “An Analysis of Cooperative R&D in the United States.”Technovation 16(3), 1996, pp. 123–131.
Roessner, J. David. “What Companies Want from the Federal Labs.”Issues in Science and Technology 10(1), 1993, pp. 37–42.
Roessner, J. David, Barry Bozeman, Irwin Feller, Christopher Hill, and Nils Newman.The Role of NSF's Engineering Support in Enabling Technological Innovation. Preliminary Report to the Directorate of Engineering, National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA: SRI International, 1996.
Rosenberg, Nathan, and Richard R. Nelson. “American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry.”Research Policy 23, 1994, pp. 323–348.
Rosenbloom, R. S., and W. J. Spencer. “The Transformation of Industrial Research.”Issues in Science and Technology 12(3), 1996, pp. 68–74.
Sherwin, C. W., and R. Isenson. “Project Hindsight: Defense Department Study of the Utility of Research.”Science 156, 1967, pp. 1571–1577.
U.S. GAO.Technology Transfer: Implementation Status of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986. Washington, DC: USGPO, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation, Research on Science and Technology Program, Contract No. 9220125. The views expressed here are the authors' and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation or any other institution.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogers, J.D., Bozeman, B. Basic research and the success of federal lab-industry partnerships. J Technol Transfer 22, 37–47 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509161
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509161