Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sparfloxacin phototoxicity: Potential photoaugmentation by ultraviolet A and B sources

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sparfloxacin, a quinolone antibacterial agent, frequently elicits photosensitive skin reactions. Our clinical studies of patients treated with sparfloxacin have demonstrated that this photosensitivity is primarily phototoxic and that a marked erythematous response is induced by sequential irradiation with ultraviolet A (UVA) and B (UVB) but not UVA or UVB alone, suggesting potential synergism between UVA and UVB. We evaluated the phototoxicity of this agent using in vitro DNA breaking activity and in vivo murine cutaneous response. Sparfloxacin induced DNA strand breaks in vitro and converted the supercoiled closed circular form of plasmid DNA to the open circular form by its photodynamic action. In mice, the topical application of sparfloxacin and subsequent irradiation with UVB, but not UVA, induced ear swelling responses. However, the UVB-induced ear swelling response was augmented by irradiation with UVA before or after UVB exposure. Such interaction between UVA and UVB in the production of ear swelling was further confirmed by systemic administration of sparfloxacin. Our study suggests that sparfloxacin is a unique phototoxic agent in that photosensitivity dermatitis is evoked by photoaugmentation between UVA and UVB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferguson J, Walker EM, Johnson BE (1989) Quinolone antibiotic-induced phototoxicity. Br J Dermatol 120:291

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ramsay CA, Obreshfova B (1974) Photosensivity from nalidixic acid. Br J Dermatol 91:523–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawabe Y, Sakakibara S, Mizuno N (1987) Photoallergic reaction due to enoxacin. Hifuka-no-Rinsho 29:51–53

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matsui C, Takahashi S, Morohashi M (1987) Three cases of enoxacin-induced photosensitivity. Rinsho-Hifuka 4:579–582

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yasuda S, Sakakibara S (1991) Photosensitivity due to lome-floxacin. Hifuka-no-Rinsho 33:1809–1812

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iwamoto Y, Itoyama T, Yasuda K, Uzuhashi T, Tanizawa H, Takino Y, Oku T, Hashizume H, Yanagihara Y (1992) Photodynamic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) strand breaking activities of enoxacin and afloqualone. Chem Pharm Bull 40:1868–1870

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iwamoto Y, Kurita K, Shimizu T, Masuzawa T, Uno K, Yagi M, Oku T, Yanagihara Y (1994) DNA strand-breaking activities of quinolone antimicrobial agents under visible light irradiation. Biol Pharm Bull 17:654–657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagai N, Yamaguchi F, Sekiguchi M, Tawara K (1990) Phototoxic potential of quinolone antibacterial agents in Balb/c mice. Toxicol Lett 54:299–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mizutani K, Tokuta Y, Iwamoto Y, Takigawa M (1995) Photosensitivity dermatitis induced by sparfloxacin. Rinsho-Hifuka 49:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iwamoto Y, Itoyama T, Yasuda K, Morita T, Masuzawa T, Yanagihara Y (1993) Photodynamic DNA strand breaking activities of acridine compounds. Biol Pharm Bull 16: 1244–1247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maniatis T, Fritsh EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, pp 86–96

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tokura Y, Takigawa M (1993) Immunological mechanisms of contact photosensitivity. Eur J Dermatol 3:87–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takigawa M, Miyachi Y (1982) Mechanisms of contact photosensitivity in mice. I. T cell regulation of contact photosensitivity to tetrachlorosalicylanilide under the genetic restrictions of the major histocompatibility complex. J Invest Dermatol 78: 108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paul BS, Parrish JA (1982) The interaction of UVA and UVB in the production of threshold erythema. J Invest Dermatol 78: 371–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaidbey KH, Kligman AM (1975) Further studies of photoaugmentation in humans: phototoxic reactions. J Invest Dermatol 65:472–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Willis I, Kligman AM, Epstein JH (1978) Effect of long ultraviolet rays on human skin: photoprotective or photoaugmentative. J Invest Dermatol 72:253–256

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harber LC, Baer RL (1972) Pathogenic mechanism of drug-induced photosensitivity. J Invest Dermatol 58:327–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tokura, Y., Iwamoto, Y., Mizutani, K. et al. Sparfloxacin phototoxicity: Potential photoaugmentation by ultraviolet A and B sources. Arch Dermatol Res 288, 45–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505042

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505042

Key words

Navigation