Advertisement

Building classroom community at a distance: A case study

  • Alfred P. Rovai
Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze a five-week graduate-level education course taught entirely at a distance via the Internet using the Blackboard.comSM e-learning system, with emphasis on exploring the dynamics of sense of classroom community. Subjects were 20 adult learners, evenly divided between males and females, who were administered the sense of classroom community index at the beginning and end of the course in order to measure classroom community. Findings indicated that on-line learners took advantage of the “learn anytime” characteristics of the Internet by accessing the course seven days per week, 24 hours per day. Sense of classroom community grew significantly during the course. Females manifested a stronger sense of community than their male counterparts both at the start and end of the course. Additionally, female students exhibited a mostly connected communication pattern while the communication pattern of males was mostly independent.

Keywords

Communication Pattern Distance Education Discussion Board Discussion Topic Classroom Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abrahamson, C.E. (1998). Issues in interactive communication in distance education.College Student Journal, 32(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
  2. Baxter-Magolda, M.B. (1992).Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986).Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, K.D. (1999). Gender differences in asynchronous learning in higher education: Learning styles, participation barriers and communication patterns.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,1(3). Retrieved April 18, 2001, from the World Wide Web:http://http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/Vol3_issue1/blum.htm
  5. Brown, K.M. (1996). The role of internal and external factors in the discontinuation of off-campus students.Distance Education, 17(1), 44–71.Google Scholar
  6. Bruffee, K.A. (1993).Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bryk, A.S., & Driscoll, M.E. (1988).The high school as community: Contextual influences and consequences for students and teachers Madison, WI: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, University of Wisconsin. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 302 539)Google Scholar
  8. Bull, K.S., Kimball, S.L., & Stansberry, S. (1998).Developing interaction in computer mediated learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 417 902)Google Scholar
  9. Comeaux, P. (1995). The impact of an interactive distance learning network on classroom communion.Communication Education, 44, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutler, R.H. (1996). Technologies, relations and selves. In L. Strate, R. Jacobson, & S.B. Gibson (Eds.),Communication and cyberspace: Social interaction in an electronic environment (pp. 317–333). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning.American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36.Google Scholar
  12. Etzioni, A. (1993).The spirit of community: Rights, responsibility, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  13. Goodlad, J.L. (1996). Democracy, education, and community. In R. Soder (Ed.),Democracy, education, and the schools (pp. 87–96). New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Hare, A.P., & Davies, M.F. (1994). Social interaction. In A.P. Hare, H.H. Blumberg, M.F. Davies, & M.V. Kent (Eds.),Small group research: A handbook (pp. 169–193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  15. Herring, S. (1996). Posting in a different voice. In C. Ess (Ed.)Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication (pp. 115–145) New York: SUNY.Google Scholar
  16. Hill, J.L. (1996). Psychological sense of community: Suggestions for future research.Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hiltz, S.R. (1998).Collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks: Building learning communities. Invited address at the WEB98 Conference, Orlando, Florida. Retrieved April 18, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://eies.njit.edu/hiltz/collaborative_learning_in_asynch.htmGoogle Scholar
  18. McMahon, T.A. (1997).From isolation to interaction? Network-based professional development and teacher professional communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Il. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 257)Google Scholar
  19. McMillan, D.W. (1996). Sense of community.Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McMillan, D.W., & Chavis, D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory.Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, M.G. (1972). Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learning.Convergence 5 (2), 76–88.Google Scholar
  22. Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (1999).Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Preece, J. (2000).Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  24. Putnam, R.D. (January 1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital.Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.Google Scholar
  25. Reingold, H. (1991).The virtual community. New York: Summit.Google Scholar
  26. Rice, R.E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network.Communication Research, 14, 85–108.Google Scholar
  27. Rovai, A.P., & Lucking, R.A. (2000).Measuring sense of classroom community. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  28. Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M.S. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course.American Journal of Distance Education, 13 (3), 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vygotsky, L. (1986).Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 34–49.Google Scholar
  31. Wellman, B. (1999). The network community: An introduction to networks in the global village. In Wellman, B. (Ed.)Networks in the global village. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  32. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). The network basis of social support: A network is more than the sum of its ties. In B. Wellman (Ed.),Networks in the global village (pp. 83118) Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfred P. Rovai
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Education of Regent University at Virginia Beach

Personalised recommendations