Abstract
The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Albanese, M.A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issue.Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52–81.
Aranda, E.K., Aranda, L., & Conlon, K. (1998).Teams: Structure, process, culture and politics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Astin, A.W. (1992).What matters most in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Aulls, M.W. (1998). Contributions of classroom discourse to what content students learn during curriculum enactment.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 56–69.
Brookfield, S.D., & Preskill, S. (1999),Discussion as a way of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Bruffee, K.A. (1995). Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning.Change, 27(19), 12–18.
Carlson, J.A., & Schodt, D.W. (1995). Beyond the lecture: Case teaching and the learning of economic theory.Journal of Economic Education, 26(1), 17–28.
Carter, J.R., & Narasimhan, R. (1996). A comparison of North American and European future purchasing trends.International Journal of Purchasing, and Materials Management, 32(2), 12–22.
Carter, K. (1989), Using cases to frame mentor-novice conversation about teaching.Theory into Practice, 27, 214–222.
Cavalier, J.C., Klein, J.D., & Cavalier, F.J. (1995). Effects of cooperative learning on performance, attitude, and group behaviors in a technical team environment.Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(3), 61–71.
Christensen, C.R. (1987).Teaching and the case method. Boston: Harvard Business School.
Christensen, C.R., Garvin, D.A., & Sweet, A. (1991).Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cliff, W.H., & Wright, A.W. (1996). Directed case study method for teaching human anatomy and physiology.Advances in Physiology Education, 15(1), S19-S28.
Cooper, J.L., & Mueck, R. (1992). Student involvement in learning. In A. Goodsell, M. Maher, & V. Tinto (Eds.),Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.
Cooper, J.L., Robinson, P.R., & McKinney, M. (1994). Cooperative learning in the classroom. In D.F. Halpern and Associates,Changing college classrooms: New teaching and learning strategies for an increasingly complex world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994.
Cross, K.P., & Steadman, M.H. (1996).Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Doriswami, M., & Towl, A.R. (1963).ASCI Case Collection. AISA Publishing House.
Droge, C., & Spreng, R. (1996). Enhancing involvement and skills with a student-led method of case analysis.Journal of Marketing Education, 18(3), 25–34.
Erskine, J.A., Leenders, M.R., & Mauffette-Leenders, L.A. (1981).Teaching with cases (1st ed.). London, Ontario, Canada: Ivey Publishing, Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario.
Erskine, J.A., Leenders, M.R., & Mauffette-Leenders, L.A. (1998).Teaching with cases (2nd ed.). London, Ontario, Canada: Ivey Publishing, Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario.
Ertmer, P.A., & Quinn, J. (1999).The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Ertmer, P.A., & Russell, J.D. (1995) Using case studies to enhance instructional design.Educational Technology, 35(4), 23–31.
Florio-Ruane, S., & Clark, C.M. (1990). Using case studies to enrich field experiences.Teacher Education Quarterly, 17, 17–28.
Gallagher, S.A., & Stepien, W.J. (1996). Content acquisition in problem-based learning: depth versus breadth in American Studies.Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(3), 257–275.
Gallagher, S.A., Stepien, W.J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving.Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195–200.
Graf, D. (1991). A model for instructional design case materials.Educational Technology Research and Development.39(2), 81–88.
Gragg, C.I. (1954). Because wisdom can't be told. In M.P. McNair (Ed.),The case method in the Harvard Business School (p. 6). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Greenwood, G.E., & Parkey, F.W. (1989).Case studies for teacher decision-making. New York: Random House.
Griffith, P.L., & Laframboise, K. (1997). The structures and patterns of case method talk: what our students taught us.Action in Teacher Education, 18(4), 10–22.
Haynes, P.J., & Helms, M.M. (1993). Increasing participation in case method courses.Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 114–117.
Herreid, C.F. (1994). Case studies in science education.Journal of College Science Teaching, 23, 221–229.
Horn, E.M., Collier, W.G., Oxford, J.A., Bond, C.F., Jr., & Dansereau, D.F. (1998). Individual differences in dyadic cooperative learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 153–161.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989).Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D.W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R.T., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effect of cooperative competitive and individualistic goal structures in achievement: A meta analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.
King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 134–152.
Kinzie, M.B., Hrabe, M.E., & Larsen, V.A. (1998). An instructional design case event: Exploring issues in professional practice.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 53–71.
Klein, J.D., & Doran, M.S. (1999). Implementing individual and small group learning structures with a computer simulation.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 97–109.
Kleinfeld, J. (1990). The special virtues of case method in preparing teachers for minority schools.Teacher Education Quarterly, 17, 43–52.
Knechel, W.R., (1992). Using the case method in accounting instruction.Issues in Accounting Education, 7(2), 205–217.
Kowalski, T.J., Weaver, R.A., & Henson, K.T. (1990).Case studies on teaching, New York: Longman.
Lawrence, P.R. (1953). The preparation of case material. In K.P. Andrews (Ed.),The case method of teaching human relations and administration (p. 215) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leenders, M.R., Fearon, H.E., & Flynn, A.E. (1997).Purchasing and supply management. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.
Levin, B.B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers thinking about cases.Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63–79.
Matejka, J.K., & Cosse, T.J. (1981).The business case method: An introduction, Richmond: Robert F. Dame.
Mauffette-Leenders, L.A., Erskine, J.A., & Leenders, M.R. (1997).Learning with cases. London, Ontario, Canada: Case and Publication Services, Richard Ivey School of Business, The University of Western Ontario.
McNair, M.P., & Hersum, A.C. (1954).The case method at the Harvard Business School. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Merseth, K.K. (1991) The early history of case-based instruction.Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 243–249.
Natasi, R.K., & Clements, D.H. (1991). Research on cooperative learning: Implications for practice.Psychology Review.
Nii, L.J., & Chin, A. (1996). Comparative trial of problem-based learning versus didactic lectures on clerkship performance.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80, 162–164.
Palinscar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1989). Classroom dialogues and promoting self-regulated comprehension. In J. Brophy (Ed.),Advances in research on teaching, 1, 35–71. New York: JAI Press.
Richardson, V. (1991).The use of cases in considering methods for motivating students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.
Shulman, J. (Ed.). (1992).Case method in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Siciliano, J., & McAleer, G.M. (1997). Increasing student participation in case discussions: Using the MICA method in strategic management courses.Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 209–220.
Slavin, R.E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.
Slavin, R.E. (1989). Cooperative learning and student achievement. In R.E. Slavin (Ed.), School and classroom organization (pp. 129–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Slavin, R.E. (1990).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Specht, L.B., & Sandlin, P.K. (1991, June). The differential effects of experiential learning activities and traditional lecture classes in accounting.Simulation and Gaming, 22, 196–210.
Stolovitch, H.D., & Yapi, A. (1997). Use of case study method to increase near and far transfer of learning.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10(2), 64–82.
Tillman, B.A. (1995). Reflections on case method teaching.Action in Teacher Education 17(1), 1–8.
Welty, W. (1989, July/August). Discussion method teaching: How to make it work.Change, 41–49.
White, H.B., III. (1996). Addressing content in problem-based courses: The learning issue matrix.Biochemical Education, 24(1), 41–45.
Wilkerson, L., & Feletti, G. (1989). Problem-based learning: One approach to increasing student participation. In A.F. Lucas (Ed.), The department chairperson's role in enhancing college teaching.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 37, 51–60.
Wilkinson, J., & Dubrow, H. (1991). Encouraging independent thinking. In C.R. Christensen, D.A. Garvin, & A. Sweet (Eds.).Education for judgment (pp. 249–261). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Williams, A.J., Giunipero, L.C., & Henthorne, T.L. (1994). The cross-functional imperative: The case of marketing and purchasing.International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(3), 29–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Anna E. Flynn is Vice President and NAPM Associate Professor with the National Association of Purchasing Management.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flynn, A.E., Klein, J.D. The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. ETR&D 49, 71–86 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504916
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504916