Educational Technology Research and Development

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 37–52 | Cite as

Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning

  • Janette R. Hill
  • Michael J. Hannafin


The digital age has not simply changed the nature of resources and information; it has transformed several basic social and economic enterprises. Contemporary society—the settings where we live, work, and learn—has likewise changed dramatically. Both the amount of information and access to it have grown exponentially; a significant potential for using varied resources in numerous ways for instruction and learning has emerged. However, several issues related to the educational uses of varied resources (e.g., people, place, things, ideas) must be addressed if we are successfully to implement resource-based learning environments. In this paper, we trace the changing nature of resources and perspectives in their use for learning in the digital age, describe the overarching structures of resource-based learning environments, and identify key challenges to be addressed.


Multiple Resource Varied Resource Digital Environment Educational Technology Research Metacognitive Scaffold 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allee, V. (1997).The knowledge evolution: Expanding organizational intelligence. New York: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  2. ALA & AECT (1998).Information power: Building partnerships for learning. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson-Inman, L., & Zeitz, L. (1993). Computer-based concept mapping: Active studying for active learners.The Computing Teacher, 21(1), 6–11.Google Scholar
  4. Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. (1997).Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  5. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.),Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Berryman, S.E. (1991).Designing effective learning environments: Cognitive apprenticeship models. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 337 689)Google Scholar
  7. Beswick, N. (1990).Resource-base learning. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Boettcher, J.V. (1998). The turtle is moving …Syllabus, 12(2), 28, 44–45.Google Scholar
  9. Boland, R.J., Tenkasi, R.V., & Te'eni, D. (1994). Designing information technology to support distributed cognition.Organization science, 5(3), 456–475.Google Scholar
  10. Breivik, P.S. (1996). Information literacy: When computers aren't enough.Learning and Leading with Technology, 23, 65–67.Google Scholar
  11. Breivik, P.S. (1998).Student learning in the information age. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.Google Scholar
  12. Bruce, B.C., Carragher, B.O., Damon, B.M., Dawson, M.J., Eurell, J.A., Gregory, C.D., Lauterbur, P.C., Marjanovic, M.M., Mason-Fossum, B., Morris, H.D., Potter, C.S., & Thakkar, U. (1997).Chickscope: An interactive MRI classroom curriculum innovation for K-12.Computers and Education, 29(2/3), 73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cavalier, R. (1998). Issues and trends.Syllabus, 12(2), 24, 26, 28.Google Scholar
  14. Chandler, D. (1999).Semiotics for beginners [on-line]. Available: Scholar
  15. Chang, S.J., & Rice, R.E. (1993). Browsing: A multidimensional framework.Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, (28), 231–76.Google Scholar
  16. Cull, P. (1991).Resource-based learning: A strategy for rejuvenating Canadian history at the intermediate school level. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 343 829)Google Scholar
  17. Dehoney, J., & Reeves, T.C. (1999). Instructional and social dimensions of class Web pages.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 10(2), 19–41.Google Scholar
  18. Dennick, R., & Exley, K. (1997). Tomorrow's doctors today: Innovations in medical teaching and learning—responding to the challenge of tomorrow's doctors.Biochemical Education, 25, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. (1933).How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  20. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996).The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.), New York, Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  21. Doiron, R., & Davies, J. (1998).Partners in learning: Students, teachers, and the school library. Englewood Cliffs, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  22. Fitzgerald, M.A. (1998).The cognitive process of information evaluation: A collective case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  23. Francis, J.W. (1997, December/January). Technology enhanced research in the science classroom: Student track down proteins through the Internet maze.JCST, 192–196.Google Scholar
  24. Fraser, A.B. (1998). Fraser's rule.Syllabus, 12(2), 45, 58–59.Google Scholar
  25. Freire, P. (1993).Pedagogy of the oppressed: New revised 20th anniversary edition. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  26. Galbreath, J. (1997). The Internet: Past, present, and future.Educational Technology, 37(6), 39–45.Google Scholar
  27. Gamas, W., & Nordquist, N. (1997). Expanding learning opportunities through on-line technology.NASSP Bulletin, 8(592), 16–22.Google Scholar
  28. Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (1998).Integrating technology for meaningful learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  29. Hannafin, M.J., Hannafin, K.M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hannafin, M.J., Hill, J.R., & Glazer, E. (in press). Designing grounded learning environments: The value of multiple perspectives in design practice. In G. Anglin (Ed.),Critical issues in instructional technology. Englewood Cliffs, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  31. Hannafin, M.J., Hill, J.R., & Land, S.M. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implications.Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94–99.Google Scholar
  32. Hannafin, M.J., Hill, J. R., & McCarthy, J. (in press). Designing resource-based learning and performance support systems. In D. Wiley (Ed.),The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Google Scholar
  33. Hannafin, M.J., & Land, S. (2000). Technology and student-centered learning in higher education: Issues and practices.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12(2), 3–30.Google Scholar
  34. Hara, K. (1997). A comparison of three methods of instruction for acquiring information skills.Educational Researcher, 39, 271–286.Google Scholar
  35. Hay, K.E., Guzdial, M., Jackson, S., Boyle, R.A., Soloway, E. (1994). Students as multimedia composers.Computers and Education, 23(4), 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haycock, C.A. (1991). Resource-based learning: A shift in the roles of teacher, learner.NAASP Bulletin, 75(535), 15–22.Google Scholar
  37. Hill, J.R. (1999a). A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in open-ended information systems.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, J.R. (1999b). Teaching technology: Implementing a problem-centered, activity-based approach.Journal of Computing Research in Education, 31(3), 261–279.Google Scholar
  39. Hill, J.R., & Cole, J.C. (1997).DOROTHIE: An expert system for training development [technical report]. Houston, TX: Johnson Space Center.Google Scholar
  40. Hill, J.R., & Hannafin, M.J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jonassen, D., & Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Kling, R., Rosenbaum, H., & Hert, C. (1998). Social informatics in information science: An introduction.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 1047–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1996). The process of learning from information. In C.C. Kuhlthau (Ed.),The virtual school library: Gateway to the information superhighway (pp. 95–104). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  44. Laffy, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Land, S.M., & Hannafin, M.J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-inaction with open-ended learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Land, S., & Hannafin, M.J. (1997). Patterns of understanding with open-ended learning environments: A qualitative study,Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Land, S., & Hannafin, M.J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In D.H. Jonassen, & S.M. Land (Eds.),Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Lemay, L., & Tyler, D. (2000).Teach yourself Web publishing with HTML 4 in 21 days (2nd ed.) Indianapolis, IN: Sams.Google Scholar
  49. Ling, P. (1997). Evaluating teaching initiatives which employ resource based learning.UltiBASE [online]. Available: Scholar
  50. Linn, M. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The Scaffolded Knowledge Integration Framework.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(20), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maddux, C., & Johnson, D.L. (1997). The World Wide Web: History, cultural context, and a manual for developers of educational information-based Web sites.Educational Technology, 37(5), 5–12.Google Scholar
  52. McCaslin, M., & Good, T. (1992). Compliant cognition: The misalliance of management and instructional goals in current school reform.Educational Researcher, 21(3), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, D.W. (1995). Teaching students to think like historians—Great American History Machine.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
  54. Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (1995),Distance education: A systems view. New York: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  55. Noesen, T.R. (1997). History comes alive.Thrust for Educational Leadership, 26, 30–31.Google Scholar
  56. Palincscar, A.S., & Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 211–225.Google Scholar
  57. Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (1999).Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  58. Parson, P.T. (1997). Electronic mail: Creating a community of learners.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(7), 560–565.Google Scholar
  59. Perkins, D.N. (1986).Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  60. Quinlan, L. (1997). Creating a classroom kaleidoscope with the World Wide Web.Educational Technology, 37(3), 15–22.Google Scholar
  61. Ray, R.D. (1995).MediaMatrix: An authoring system for adaptive hypermedia teaching-learning resource libraries.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7(1), 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reigeluth, C.M. (1988). The search for meaningful reform: A third-wave educational system.Journal of Instructional Development, 10(4), 3–14.Google Scholar
  63. Reigeluth, C.M., & Squire, K. (1998). Emerging work on the new paradigm of instructional theories.Educational Technology, 38(4), 41–47.Google Scholar
  64. Rescher, N. (1989).Cognitive economy: The economic dimension of the theory of knowledge. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  65. Segall, W.E., & Wilson, A.E. (1998). Learning and teaching in the classroom. In W.E. Segall & A.E. Wilson,Introduction to education: Teaching in a diverse society (pp. 151–170). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
  66. Shambaugh, R.N., & Magliaro, S.G. (1997).Mastering the possibilities: A process approach to instructional design. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  67. Shotsberger, P. (1996). Instructional uses of the World Wide Web: Exemplars and precautions.Educational Technology, 36(2), 47–50.Google Scholar
  68. Sloane, A. (1997). Learning with the Web: Experience of using the World Wide Web in a learning environment.Computers & Education, 28(4), 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stripling, B.K., & Pitts, J.M. (1988).Brainstorms and blueprints: Teaching library research as a thinking process. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  70. Tenopir, C., & Lunin, L.F. (1998). Introduction and overview.Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 49(11), 957–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thornburg, D.D. (1998). Reading the future.American School Board Journal: Electronic School, 185(6), A14-A17.Google Scholar
  72. Toffler, A. (1993, November). Shock wave (anti) warrior.Wired. Available on-line: Scholar
  73. Ward, D.R., & Tiessen, E.L. (1997). Adding educational value to the Web: Active learning with AlivePages.Educational Technology, 37(5), 22–31.Google Scholar
  74. Weedman, J. (1999). Conversation and community: The potential of electronic conferences for creating intellectual proximity in distributed learning environments.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 907–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Witmer, D.F. (1998). Introduction to computer-mediated communication: A master syllabus for teaching communication technology.Communication Education, 47, 162–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yan, J., Torjman, P., & Clipsham, D. (1998). Successful resource-based learning strategies for the geography of Canada courses.Canadian Social Studies, 32(3), 85–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janette R. Hill
    • 1
  • Michael J. Hannafin
    • 1
  1. 1.the Learning and Performance Support Laboratory in the College of Education at the University of GeorgiaUSA

Personalised recommendations