Abstract
For this study, we examined the cogency, comprehensiveness, and viability of team-based problem solutions of a Web-based hypermedia case designed to promote student understanding of the practice of instructional design. Participants were 14 students enrolled in a graduate course on advanced instructional design. The case was presented to students using two hypermedia structures, hierarchical (tree-like structure) and heterarchical (network-like structure). Results from analyses of four data sources revealed that problem solutions developed in response to the heterarchical case design were more cogent and convincing than problem solutions developed in response to the hierarchical case design. Specifically, the heterarchical case solutions provided evidence of a heuristic problem-solving process facilitating the identification of an expert-like solution to the case and the articulation of learners' understanding and application of grounded and engaging instructional designs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Allen, B. S., Otto, R. G., & Hoffman, B. (2000). Casebased learning: A review of the literature on its outcomes and implementation issues.Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81.
Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2003).The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL (April 21–25, 2003).
Barrows, H. S. (1985).How to design a problem-based curriculum for the pre-clinical years. New York, NY: Springer.
Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones (Eds.),Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 121–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dabbagh, N. (2002). Assessing complex problem-solving skills and knowledge assembly using Webbased hypermedia design.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11(4), 291–322.
Dabbagh, N., Jonassen, D. H., Yueh H.-P., & Samouilova, M. (2000). Assessing a problem-based learning approach in an introductory instructional design course: A case study.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(3), 60–83.
Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style.Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322–349.
Ertmer, P. A., & Quinn, J. (1999).The ID case book: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Grissom, S., & Koschmann, T. (1995). Hypermedia without programming: Automatic generation of presentation documents for case-based instruction.Emerging Technologies, Lifelong Learning, NECC 95 Proceedings.
Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S. M., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environmentsEducational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 101–117.
Hemstreet, S. (1997).Using hypermedia to facilitate problem-based learning. Retrieved March 25, 2002, from http://www.edb.utexas.edu/mmresearch/Studen ts97/Hemstreet/index.htm.
Jacobson, M., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1996). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research,Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 5(3/4), 239–281.
Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(4), 301–333.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional desgn model for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–90.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving.Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Casebased reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem-solving.Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65–78.
Jonassen, D. H., & Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(10), 1–8.
Julian, M., Kinzie, M. B., & Larsen, V. A. (2000). Compelling case experiences: Performance, practice, and application for emerging instructional designers.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(3), 164–201.
Larson, K., & Czerwinski, M. (1998). Web page design: Implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval. InProceedings of CHI '98, Human Factors in Computing Systems (LA, April 21–23, 1998), (pp. 25–32). ACM Press.
Last, D. A., O'Donnell, A. M., & Kelly, A. E. (2001). The effects of prior knowledge and goals strength on the use of hypetext.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(1), 3–25.
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003).Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem-solving, learning, and teaching, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mayer, R. E. (1992).Thinking, problem-solving, cognition (2nd edition), New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Melara, G. E. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertext environments: Hierarchical-like and network-like structures.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(4), 313–328.
Oliver, K. M. (1996). A critical analysis of hypermedia and virtual learning environments. ERIC document: ED 412 925
Quinn, J. (1994). Connecting education and practice in an instructional design graduate program.Educcational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 71–82.
Rowland, G., Parra, M. L., & Basnet, K. (1995). Educating instructional designers: Different methods for different outcomes. In B. B. Seels (Ed.),Instructional design fundamentals: A reconsideration, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Siegel, M., Derry, S., Kim, J., Steinkuehler, C., Street, J., Canty, N., Fassnacht, C., Hewson, K., Hmelo, C. & Spiro, R. (2000). Promoting teachers' flexible use of the learning sciences through case-based problemsolving on the WWW: A theoretical design approach. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.)Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 273–279). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, P. A., Newman, I. A., & Parks, L. M. (1997). Virtual hierarchies and virtual networks: Some lessons from hypermedia usability research applied to the World Wide Web.Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(1), 67–95.
Stepich, D. A., Ertmer, P. A., & Lane, M. M. (2001). Problem-solving in a case-based course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise.Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 53–69.
Sutyak, J. P., Lebeau, R. B., & O'Donnell, A. M. (1998). Unstructured cases in case-based learning benefit students with primary care career preferences.The American Journal of Surgery, 175, 503–507.
Tergan, S. (1997). Misleading theoretical assumptions in hypertext/hypermedia research.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(3/4), 257–283.
Welty, W. (1989). Discussion method teaching.Change, July/August, 40–49.
Williams, S. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367–427.
Winegardner, K. E. (2001).The case study method of scholarly research. Retrieved July 14, 2001, from http://www.tgsa.edu/online/cybrary/casel.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dabbagh, N., Denisar, K. Assessing team-based instructional design problem solutions of hierarchical versus heterarchical Web-based hypermedia cases. ETR&D 53, 5–22 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504863
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504863