Over the years, many authors have tried to describe, conceptualize, and visualize the instructional design or development processes via a variety of process models. Most descriptions imply a rather homogeneous view of design, depicting it as an overall problem-solving process following general phases such as analysis, design and development, implementation, and evaluation (ADDIE). However, researchers who have investigated how instructional designers actually work suggest that the process is much more heterogeneous and diverse than these ADDIE models suggest. This study collected case study data from 24 instructional designers in six different settings; they were identified as experts by their peers. The design processes they used for a specific project were compared to four different paradigms created from the literature. The four paradigms and their underlying theoretical foundations are described and illustrated. Detailed results are reported, and reasons that designers did or did not use a particular paradigm are considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Andrews, D.H., & Goodson, L.A. (1991). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. In G.J. Anglin (Ed.),Instructional technology: Past, present and future (pp. 133–155). Englewood Cliffs, CO: Libraries unlimited.
Bobbitt, F. (1924).How to make a curriculum. Boston, MA: Mifflin Company.
Braden, R.A. (1996). The case for linear instructional design and development: A commentary on models, challenges, and myths.Educational Technology, 36(2), 5–23.
Connell, J., & Shafer, L. (1989). Structured rapid prototyping: An evolutionary approach to software development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Yourdan Press.
Coyne, R. (1995).Designing information technology in the postmodern age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Derrida, J., & Attridge, D. (1992).Acts of literature. New York, NY: Routledge.
Descartes, R. (1930).Discours de la methode (2nd ed.). Paris, France: Vrin.
Dewey, J. (1938).Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996).The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Dills, C.R., & Romiszowksi, A.J. (1997). The instructional development paradigms: An introduction. In C.R. Dills & A.J. Romiszowski (Eds.),Instructional development paradigms (pp. 5–30). Englewood cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Eisner, E.W. (1979).The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E.W. (1996).The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Feteris, A. (1992). Ideeën voor het genereren van alternatieven [Ideas for the generation of alternative solutions]. In Tj. Plomp, A. Feteris, J.M. Pieters, & W. Tomic (eds.),Ontwerpen van onderwijs en trainingen (pp. 171–193). Utrecht, Netherlands: Lemma.
Gagné, R., Briggs, L., & Wager, W. (1992).Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Gerlach, V.S., & Ely, D.P. (1980).Teaching and media: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gray, D.E., & Black, T.R. (1994). Prototyping of computer-based training materials.Computers in Education, 22(3), 251–256.
Gustafson, K. (1993). Instructional design fundamentals: Clouds on the horizon.Educational Technology, 33(2), 27–32.
Gustafson, K., & Branch, R. (2002).Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources.
Habermas, J. (1981).Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of communicative action]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Hedberg, J., Harper, B., Brown, C., & Corderoy, R. (1994). Exploring user interfaces to improve outcomes. In K. Beatie, C. McNaught, & S. Wills (Eds.),Interactive Multimedia in University Education: Designing for Change in Teaching and Learning (pp.15–29). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Henderson, J.V. (1998). Comprehensive, technology-based clinical education: The virtual practicum.International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 28(1), 41–79.
Hix, D., & Hartson, H. (1993).Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability through product and process. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
James, W. (1907).Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking: Popular lectures on philosophy. New York: Longmans, Green.
Johnson, J.C. (1990).Selecting ethnographic informants. Qualitative research methods series, 22. Newbury Park: Sage.
Kessels, J.W.M. (1993).Towards design standards for curriculum consistency in corporate education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Kessels, J.W.M., & Plomp, Tj. (1997). The importance of relational aspects in the systems approach. In A.J. Romiszowski & C.R. Dills (Eds.),Instructional development paradigms (pp. 93–126). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Keursten, P. (1994).Courseware-ontwikkeling met het oog op implementatie: de doœnt centraal [Courseware development from an implementation perspective: Focus on the teacher]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Kunneman, H., & Munnichs, G.M. (1988). Jürgen Habermas. In H.J. Achterhuis, J.S. Weiland, S.E. Teppema, & J. de Visscher (Eds.),Kritisch denkerslexicon, 25 (pp. 1–17) Samson: Alphen aan de Rijn.
Lantz, K.E. (1985).The prototyping methodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Marsh, C., & Willis, G. (1995).Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
Mauldin, M. (1995). Developing multimedia: A method to the madness.THE Journal, 22(7), 88–90.
McCutcheon, G. (1995).Developing the curriculum: Solo and group deliberation. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Merriam, S.B. (1988).Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Moonen, J.C.M.M. (1996). Prototyping as a design method. In Tj. Plomp & D.P. Ely (Eds.)International Encyclopedia of Educational Technology (2nd ed., pp. 186–190). Cambridge: Pergamon.
Morrison, S., Ross, G., & Kemp, J. (2001).Designing effective instruction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Nieveen, N.M. (1997).Computer support for curriculum developers: A study on the potential of computer support in the domain of formative curriculum evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Plomp, Tj. (1982).Onderwijskundige technologie: Enige verkenningen. [Educational technology: Several explorations]. Enschede, the Netherlands, University of Twente, Faculty of Educational Sciences and technology.
Porras, L.H., & Giodano, D. (1995). Developing hypermedia with a rapid prototyping approach: A case study.British Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 59–61.
Posner, G.J., & Rudnitsky, A.N. (2000).Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
Putnam, H. (1988).Representation and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Procee, H. (1997).De nieuwe ingenieur: Over techniekfilosofie en professioneel handelen [The new engineer: About philosophy of technology and professional action]. Amsterdam: Boom.
Reiser, R., & Dick, W. (1996).Instructional planning: A guide for teachers (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Richey, R.C. (1993). Instructional design in a changing field.Educational Technology, 33(2), 16–21.
Richey, R.C., Klein, J.D., & Nelson, W.A. (2003). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology: A Project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 1099–1130). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rieber, L.P. (1994).Computers, graphics, and learning. Dubuque, IA: Brown and Benchmark.
Romiszowksi, A.J. (1981).Designing instructional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design. London: Kogan Page.
Rorty, R. (1979).Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rorty, R. (1991).Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowland, G. (1992). What do instructional designers actually do? An initial investigation of expert practice.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 5(2), 30–45.
Schön, D.A. (1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D.A. (1987).Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schubert, W.H. (1986).Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York: MacMillan.
Schwab, J.J. (1970).The practical: A language for curriculum. Washington DC: National Education Association.
Self, J.A. (1997). From constructionism to deconstructionism: Anticipating trends in educational styles.European Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 295–307.
Smith, P.L., & Ragan, T.J. (1999).Instructional design. New York, NY: Wiley.
Tessmer, M. (1994). Formative evaluation alternatives.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(1), 3–18.
Tripp, S.D., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy.Educational Technology and Development, 38(1), 31–44.
Tyler, R.W. (1949).Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R.M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & Tj. Plomp (Eds.),Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Van de Wolde, J. (1992). Het algemeen model voor systematische probleemoplossing [The generic model for systematic problem solving]. In Tj. Plomp, A. Feteris, J.M. Pieters, & W. Tomic (Eds.),Ontwerpen van onderwijs en trainingen (pp. 65–87). Utrecht: Lemma.
Visscher, K., & Rip, A. (1999). Organisatie-adviseurs en de illusie van “agency” [Management consultants and the illusion of agency].Management en Organisatie, 53(1), 24–35.
Visscher-Voerman, J.I.A. (1999).Design Approaches in Training and Education: A reconstructive study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Visscher, I., & Schulten, E. (1997).Design approaches in training and education: Insights from practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AERA, Chicago.
Vos, H.J. (1992). Het kiezen van een oplossing [Choosing a solution]. In Tj. Plomp, A. Feteris, J.M. Pieters, & W. Tomic (Eds.),Ontwerpen van onderwijs en trainingen (pp. 195–220). Utrecht, Netherlands: Lemma.
Walker, D. (1990).Fundamentals of curriculum. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College.
Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional designers' decisions and priorities: A survey of design practice.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(2), 43–57.
Willis, J. (1998). Alternative instructional paradigms: What's worth discussing and what isn't?Educational Technology, 38(3), 5–16.
About this article
Cite this article
Visscher-Voerman, I., Gustafson, K.L. Paradigms in the theory and practice of education and training design. ETR&D 52, 69–89 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504840
- Design Process
- Educational Technology
- Instructional Design
- Design Activity
- Communicative Rationality