Advertisement

Design languages, notation systems, and instructional technology: A case study

  • Sandie H. Waters
  • Andrew S. Gibbons
Development

Abstract

Notational systems, used in mature fields of study, are closely related to design languages. The future of a technological field depends on the ability to communicate ideas and changes with others in the field. Instructional technology is one field that can benefit from a notation system enabling designers to duplicate, execute, and communicate their ideas.

In this paper, we look at several mature fields, including chemistry, musicology, and choreography, to discover elements where a mature design language and notation system have developed. We illustrate a number of dimensions that can help designers form their design languages and select the characteristics of their notation systems.

Keywords

Instructional Designer Emotional Content Instructional Technology Notation System Design Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australian Ballet, The, & Sydney Dance Company. (n.d.).About male dancers. Retrieved January 4, 2003, from http://www.education.australianballet.com .au/main.cfm?mainmenuid=3&submenuid=24Google Scholar
  2. Crosby, A. W. (1997).The measure of reality: Quantification in western Europe, 1250 to 1600. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Einstein, A. (n.d.)Working minds. Retrieved January 12, 2003, from http://www.working-minds. com/AEquotes.htmGoogle Scholar
  4. Eckel, K. (1993).Instruction language: Foundations of a strict science of instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Gibbons, A. S. (2003).Design languages. Ms in prep.Google Scholar
  6. Griesbeck, C. (1996).Introduction to Labanotation. Retrieved September 17, 2002, from http://www.rz. uni-frankfurt.de/griesbec/LABANE.HTMLGoogle Scholar
  7. Horn, R. E. (1974). Information mapping.Training in Business and Industry 11(3).Google Scholar
  8. Indigo Instruments. (2002).Sucrose molecular model kit. Retrieved January 9, 2003, from http://indigo.com/models/gphmodel/sucrose-model-M.htmlGoogle Scholar
  9. Merrill, D. M. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 282–333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, J. (2002). What UML should be: Introduction.Communications of the ACM.Google Scholar
  11. Oregon State University. (2003, January 19).Food resource. Retrieved January 22, 2003, from http://food.orst.edu/sugar/sucrose.htmlGoogle Scholar
  12. Petroski, H. (1998)Invention by design: How engines get from thought to thing. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rifkin, G. (2002). GM's internet overhaul.Technology Review, October(2002), 62–67.Google Scholar
  14. Sabbagh, K. (1996).21st century jet: The making and marketing of the Boeing 777. NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
  15. Stolurow, L. M. (1969). Some Factors in the Design of Systems for Computer-Assisted Instruction. In R. C. Atkinson & H. A. Wilson (Eds.),Computer-Assisted Instruction: A Book of Readings. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sutton, V. (1983).A collection of classical ballet variations. La Jolla, CA: The Sutton Movement Writing Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sutton, V. (2002, February).Sutton dance writing: Read and write the movements of dance. Retrieved September 21, 2002, from www.signwriting.org/acrobat/infopack/15-dancewriting-brochure.pdfGoogle Scholar
  18. Watts, V. (1998, March)History of notation. Retrieved October 16, 2002, from http://www.ballet.co. uk/mar98/notation_history.htmGoogle Scholar
  19. Watts, V. (1998).Dance notation. Retrieved January 12, 2003, from http://www.ballet.co.uk/jan98/dance_notation_1.htmGoogle Scholar
  20. Winograd, T. (1996).Bringing design to software. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandie H. Waters
    • 1
  • Andrew S. Gibbons
    • 2
  1. 1.Instructional Technology Department at Utah State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Instructional Psychology & Technology Department at Brigham Young UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations