Stratified simple random sampling and prior distributions

  • V. Nagi Reddy


The problem of stratification with proportional and optimum allocations in the case of simple random sampling has been examined in the light of an appropriate super-population model and a formal proof has been provided here for arranging the auxiliary character in increasing order of magnitude for stratification in the case of proportional allocation and also it is shown here that the same may not be necessary in the case of optimum allocation. However, if the coefficient of variation with respect to the auxiliary variate is same in each stratum the necessity of arraging the auxiliary character in increasing order of magnitude for stratification is established. The results are illustrated with respect to empirical examples. Also, some comparisons among different estimators have been made under the super-population model.


Stratified simple random sampling stratification mis-stratification: arranging the auxiliary character in the increasing or decreasing order of magnitude prior distributions, PPS sampling allocation of sample size to strata 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Census of India (1961).District Census Hand Book, Kolhapur, 18–23. Maharashtra.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Census of India (1961).District Census Hand Book, Burdwan,11, 564–575. West Bengal.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Dalenius, T. (1950). The problem of optimum stratification—I,Skand Aktuarietidiskr.,33, 203–213.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Dalenius, T. (1952). The problem of optimum stratification, in a special type of design,Skand. Aktuarietidiskr. 35, 61–70.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Dalenius, T. and Gurney, M (1951). The problem of optimum stratification—II,Skand. Aktuarietidiskr.,34, 133–148.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Dalenius, T. and Hodges, J. L., Jr. (1957). The choice of stratification points,Skand. Aktuarietidiskr.,40, 198–203.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dalenius, T. and Hodges, J. L., Jr. (1959). Minimum variance stratification,J. Amer. Statist. Ass.,54, 88–101.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ekman, G. (1959). An approximation useful in univariate stratification,Ann. Math. Statist.,30, 219–229.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Govt. of India, Ministry of Food and Agriculture (1962).Maharashtra and Gujarat Agricultural Statistics 166–169.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hanurav, T. V. (1965). Optimum sampling strategies and some related problems, Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Statistical Institute, Calcutta.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Isii, K. and Taga, Y. (1969). On optimal stratifications for multivariate distributions,Skand. Aktuarietidiskr., 1–2, 24–38.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Mahalanobis, P. C. (1952). Some aspects of the design of sample surveys,Sankhya,12, 1–7.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Raj, Des (1958). On the relative accuracy of some sampling techniques,J. Amer. Statist. Ass.,53, 98–101.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Rao, T. J. (1968). On the allocation of sample size in stratified sampling,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,18, 159–166.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Sethi, V. K. (1963). A note on optimum stratification of population,Aust. J. Statist.,5, 20–35.MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Taga, Y. (1967). On optimum stratification for the objective variable based on concomitant variables using prior information,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,19, 101–129.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Vijayan, K. (1966). On Horvitz-Thompson and Des Raj estimators,Sankhya, A,28, 87–92.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Institute of Statistical Mathematics 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Nagi Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of ManagementCalcutta

Personalised recommendations