Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?

  • Peggy A. Ertmer
Research

Abstract

Although the conditions for successful technology integration finally appear to be in place, including ready access to technology, increased training for teachers, and a favorable policy environment, high-level technology use is still surprisingly low. This suggests that additional barriers, specifically related to teachers' pedagogical beliefs, may be at work. Previous researchers have noted the influence of teachers' beliefs on classroom instruction specifically in math, reading, and science, yet little research has been done to establish a similar link to teachers' classroom uses of technology. In this article, I argue for the importance of such research and present a conceptual overview of teacher pedagogial beliefs as a vital first step. After defining and describing the nature of teacher beliefs, including how they are likely to impact teachers' classroom practice I describe important implications for teacher professional development and offer suggestions for future research.

Keywords

Professional Development Preservice Teacher Cuban Technology Integration Teacher Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albion, P. (2003). PBL+IMM=PBL2: Problem based learning and interactive multimedia development.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11, 243–257. [Online]. Available: http://dl.aace.org/13564Google Scholar
  2. Albion, P., & Ertmer, P. A. (2002). Beyond the foundations: The role of vision and belief in teachers' preparation for integration of technology.TechTrends, 46(5), 34–38.Google Scholar
  3. American Federation of Teachers. (1999). Block scheduling-Look before you leap.American Teacher. Retrieved March 15, 2002, from www.aft. org/publications/american_teacher/html.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K-12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the National Technology Standards,Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 489–507.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, H. J. (1994). How examplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 291–321.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, H. J. (2000).Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? [PDF file]. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved October 2, 2001, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, H. J. & Riel, M. M. (1999).Teacher professionalism, school work culture and the emergence of constructivist-compatible pedagogies [PDF file]. Center for Research on Information, Technology and Organizations. Retrieved October 2, 2002, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc.Google Scholar
  9. Berg, S., Benz, C.R., Lasley, T.J., & Raisch, C.D. (1998). Exemplary technology use in elementary classrooms.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 111–122.Google Scholar
  10. Block, J. H., & Hazelip, K. (1995). Teachers' beliefs and belief systems. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.),International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 25–28). New York: Pergammon.Google Scholar
  11. Brownlee, P. P. (2000, September). Effecting transformational institutional change.The National Academy Newsletter, 1. Retrieved February 6, 2004, from http://www.thenationalacademy.org/Newsletter s/vol1–3.html.Google Scholar
  12. Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. Berliner, & R. Calfee (Eds.).Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Cuban, L. (1986).Teachers and machines. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cuban, L. (1997, May 21). High-tech schools and lowtech teaching.Education Week on the Web. Retrieved February 10, 2004, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-16/34cuban.h16.Google Scholar
  16. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox.American Educational Research Journal, 38, 813–834.Google Scholar
  17. Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dede, C. (Ed.) (1988).Learning with technology: The 1998 ASCD Yearbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum, Development.Google Scholar
  19. Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers' views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 221–238.Google Scholar
  20. Downes, T. (1993). Student-teachers' experiences in using computers during teching, practice.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9, 17–33.Google Scholar
  21. Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1990).Teacher beliefs and practices part 1: Patterns of change. The evolution of teacher's instructional beliefs and practices in high-access-to-technology classrooms (ACOT Report #8). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer.Google Scholar
  22. Elmore, R., Peterson, P., & McCarthy, S (1996).Restructuring in the classroom. San Francisco: JosseyGoogle Scholar
  23. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and secondorder barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ertmer, P. A. (2001). Responsive instructional design: Scaffolding the adoption and change process.Educational Technology, 41(6), 33–38.Google Scholar
  25. Ertmer, P. A., Conklin, D., Lewandowski, J., Osika, E., Selo, M., & Wignall, E. (2003). Increasing preservice teachers' capacity for technology integration through use of electronic models.Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 95–112.Google Scholar
  26. Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-using teachers: Comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,33(5). Available online at http://www.iste.org/jrte/33/5/ertmer.html.Google Scholar
  27. Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices.Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.Google Scholar
  28. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers.American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.Google Scholar
  29. Goodman, J. (1988). Constructing a practical philosophy of teaching: A study of preservice teachers' professional perspectives.Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant, C. M. (1996).Professional development in a technological age: New definitions, old challenges, new resources. Retrieved April 11, 2003, from http://ra.terc.edu/publications/TERC_pubs/tech-infusion/prof_dev/prof_dev_intro.html.Google Scholar
  31. Griffin, T. D., & Ohlsson, S. (2001, August).Beliefs vs. knowledge: A necessary distinction for predicting, explaining and assessing conceptual change. Presented at the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved January 13, 2004, from http://tigger.uic.edu/tgriffin/.Google Scholar
  32. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change.Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guskey, T. R. (1995).Results-oriented professional development: In search of an optimal mix of effective practices. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL), Naperville, IL. Retrieved February 24, 2003. from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/pdlit rev.htm.Google Scholar
  34. Handler, M. G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators.Computers and Education, 20, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hooper, S., & Rieber, L. (1995). Teaching with technology. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.),Theory into practice (pp. 155–170). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  36. Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N., & Purcell, S. (2000). The experience of constructivism: Transforming teacher epistemology.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 455–465.Google Scholar
  37. International Society for Technology in Education. (2003).National education technology standards (NETS). Retrieved February 6, 2004, from http://cnets.iste.org/.Google Scholar
  38. Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Iferences concerning the Goldilocks principle.Review of Educational Research, 60, 419–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief.Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kane, R., Sandetto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics.Review of Educational Research, 72, 177–228.Google Scholar
  41. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lumpe, A. T., & Chambers, E. (2001). Assessing teachers' context beliefs about technology use.Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 93–107.Google Scholar
  43. Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1993). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26, 220–237.Google Scholar
  44. Marcinkiewicz, H. R., & Regstad, N. G. (1996). Using subjective norms to predict teachers' computer use.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–33.Google Scholar
  45. Market Data Retrieval. (2002).Technology in education 2002, Shelton, CT: Market Data Retrieval.Google Scholar
  46. Munby, H. (1982). The place of teachers' beliefs on research on teacher thinking and decision making, and an alternative methodology.Instructional Science, 11, 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000, September).Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology (Report No. NCES 2000-102). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  48. National Staff Development Council. (2001).Standards for staff development (Rev. ed.), Oxford, OH: Author.Google Scholar
  49. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.Google Scholar
  50. Newman, H. (2002, February 26). Computers used more to learn than teach.Detroit Free Press. Retrieved, April 29, 2002, from, http://www.freepress.com/news/education/new man26_20020226.htm.Google Scholar
  51. Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software.Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (1998). Block scheduling in North Carolina: Implementation, teaching, and impact issues. Raleigh, NC: Author.Google Scholar
  53. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct.Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers' beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment.Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers' pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics.Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change.Science Education, 66, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. President's Panel on Educational Technology. (1997).Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States, Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  58. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning.Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rokeach, M. (1968).Belief, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  60. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997).Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schunk, D. H. (2000).Learning theories: An educational perspective (3rd. ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  62. Scott, S. M., Chovanec, D. M., & Young, B. (1994). Philosophy-in-action in university teaching.Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 24(5), 1–25.Google Scholar
  63. Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2001–2002). Thrust into technology: How veteran teachrs respond.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(1), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. U.S. Department of Education. (1996).Goals 2000: Educate America Act, October 1996 Update. Retrieved March 4, 2001, from http: //www.ed.gov/G2K/g 2k-fact.html.Google Scholar
  65. U.S. Department of Education (2001).No child left behind Act of 2001. Retrieved July 31, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/asst.html.Google Scholar
  66. U.S. Department of Education. (2003).Federal funding for educational technology and how it is used in the classroom: A summary of findings from the Integrated Studies of Educational Technology. Office of the Under Secretary, Policy and Program Studies Service: Washington, D.C. Retrieved February 6, 2004, from www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/os/technology/e valuation.html.Google Scholar
  67. Vacc, N. N., & Bright, G. W. (1999). Elementary preservice teachers' changing beliefs and instructional use of children's mathematical thinking.Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Waters, J. T., Marzano, R. J., McNulty, B. A. (2003).Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.Google Scholar
  69. Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history.Teachers College Record, 89, 525–539.Google Scholar
  70. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers.Review of Educational Research, 72, 131–175.Google Scholar
  71. Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture.American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205.Google Scholar
  72. Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5–30.Google Scholar
  73. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective.American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807–840.Google Scholar
  74. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations.Teachers College Record, 104, 482–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peggy A. Ertmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Curriculum and Instruction Department at Purdue UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations