Abstract
The effects of different approaches to learning Chinese characters were investigated. Ninety-two high-school students were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups: translation, verbal mnemonics, visual mnemonics, dual coding mnemonics, or self-generated mnemonics. All groups received instruction and completed posttests in a computer-based environment. The results indicate that participants who generated their own mnemonics demonstrated higher posttest performance than those in visual coding, verbal coding, and translation groups; subjects in the dual coding group scored higher than those in the translation group. Those who generated their own mnemonics spent more time on task than any other group, and those in the verbal coding group took more time than those in the translation group. Survey and qualitative data suggest that learners' interpretations of the Chinese characters were rooted in their cultural backgrounds and personal experiences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M., & Perry, J.D. (1991). Theory into practice: How do we link? In Anglin, G.J. (Ed.),Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 88–101). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Bellezza, A.S. (1981). Mnemonic devices: Classification, characteristics, and criteria.Review of Educational Research, 51(2), 247–275.
Butler, C., & Blake, R. (1973, April).Cognitive scaffolding in the learning of foreign language vocabulary: An experimental study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Las Vegas, NV.
Carrier, C., Karbo, K., & Kindem, H. (1983). Use of selfgenerated and supplied visuals as mnemonics in gifted children's learning.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57(1), 235–240.
Chuang, C.J. (1975). The function of imagery in learning of Chinese language.Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 1, 145–150.
Clark, J., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education.Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grabowski, B.L. (1996). Generative learning: Past, present, and future. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (pp. 897–918). New York: Macmillan.
Jonassen, D. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning.Educational Technology, 30(9), 28–33.
Ke, C. (1996). An empirical study on the relationship between Chinese character recognition and production.Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 340–350.
Kibler, J.L., & Blick, K.A. (1972). Evaluation of experimenter-supplied and subject-originated first-letter mnemonic in a free-recall task.Psychological Reports, 30, 307–313.
Kobayashi, S. (1986). Theoretical issues concerning superiority of picture over words and sentences in memory.Perceptual and Motor Skill, 63, 783–792.
Li, X. (1996). Hypercharacters: A pilot study in computerized learning of Chinese characters.CALICO Journal, 14(1), 77–94.
Mantyla, T., & Nillson, L. (1983). Are my cues better then your cues?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 303–312.
Mayer, R.E., & Anderson, R.B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of dual-coding hypothesis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 484–490.
Mayer, R.E., & Anderson, R.B. (1992). The instructional animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 444–452.
Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning.Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107–119.
Mayer, R.E., & Sims, V.K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389–401.
McGinnis, S. (1995, November).Does Johnny even want to read: Student attitudes and approaches in the learning of written Chinese. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, Anaheim, CA.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A., & Lambert, W. (1981). Dual coding and bilingual memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 532–539.
Paradis, M. (1978). The stratification of bilingualism. In M. Paradis (Ed.),Aspects of bilingualism (pp. 165–176). Columbia, SC: Hornbean Press.
Rieber, L.P. (1989). The effects of computer animated elaboration strategies and practice on factorial and application learning in an elementary science lesson.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(4), 431–444.
Rieber, L.P. (1990). Animation and computer-based instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 77–86.
Rieber, L.P. (1991). Animation, incidental learning and continuing motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 318–328.
Rieber, L.P., & Kini, A.S. (1991). Theoretical foundations of instructional applications of computer-generated animated visuals.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 83–88.
Sadoski, M., Goetz, E., & Avila, E. (1995). Concreteness effects in text recall: Dual coding or context available?Reading Research Quarterly, 30(2), 278–288.
Sadoski, M., Paivio, A., & Goetz, E. (1991). A critique of schema theory in reading and a dual coding alternative.Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 463–484.
Steffensen, M.S., Goetz, E.T., & Cheng, X. (1999) The images and emotions of bilingual Chinese readers: A dual coding analysis.Reading Psychology, 20(4), 301–324.
Swanson, H.L. (1988). The effects of self-generated visual mnemonics on adult learning disabled readers' word recall.Learning Disabilities Research, 4(1), 26–35.
Taura, H. (1998). Bilingual dual coding in Japanese returnee students.Language, Culture and Curriculum, 11(1), 47–70.
Towers, R.L., & Anglin, G.J. (1994, February).The instructional effectiveness of computer-aniimated and static visuals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Nashville, TN.
Turnage, T., & McGinnies, E. (1973). A cross-cultural comparison of the effects of presentation mode and meaningfulness on short-term recall.American Journal of Psychology, 86(2), 369–381.
Wall, H.M., & Routowicz, A. (1987). Use of self-generated cues in immediate and delayed recall.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 1019–1022.
Wang, A.Y., & Thomas, M.H. (1992). The effects of imagery-based mnemonics on the long-term retention of Chinese characters.Language Learning, 42(3), 359–376.
Wang, A.., & Thomas, M.H. (1996). Mnemonic instruction and gifted child.Roeper Review, 19(2), 104–105.
Wang, A.Y., Thomas, M.H., & Quellette, J.A. (1992). Keyword mnemonic retention of second-language vocabulary words.Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 520–528.
Wang, G.C. (1989). Research on teaching Chinese in forty-five universities: Analysis of survey results.Journal of Chinese Language Teaching Association, 24(3) 101–113.
Wang, S. (1998). A study on the learning and teaching of Hanzi-Chinese characters.Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 14(1), 69–101.
Williams, M.D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (pp. 957–983). New York: Macmillan.
Wittrock, M.C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension.Educational Psychologist, 24(4), 345–376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amy Kuo, ML., Hooper, S. The effects of visual and verbal coding mnemonics on learning Chinese characters in computer-based instruction. ETR&D 52, 23–34 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504673
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504673