Skip to main content
Log in

Using rapid application development to improve the usability of a preservice teacher technology course

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this research was to examine the use of a rapid application development (RAD) approach in improving the usability (effectiveness, efficiency, and appeal) of instructional materials for preservice teachers. The RAD approach used was the analysis, synthesis, evaluation and change (ASEC) model (Reigeluth & Nelson, 1997). After examining existing materials, 11 units of instruction were prototyped, tested, modified, and retested with the requisite changes being implemented over the course of three semesters. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from 570 students, 7 instructional designers, and 4 lab assistants. Results of the study showed significant increases in usability scores between the second and third semester. Both positive and negative experiences in using a rapid development model are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bender, J. (1987).Teaching introductory logic in the self-paced Keller format. Paper presented at the Conference on Critical Thinking Skills in College Academic Enrichment Programs. Los Angeles: February 5–6, 1987.

  • Betts, K.S. (1998). Factors Influencing Faculty Participation in Distance Education in Post-Secondary Education in the United States: An Institutional Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University. (Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(07), 2376A).

  • Caldwell, E.C. (1985). Dangers of PSI.Teaching in Psychology 12(1), 9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, J.F. (1976). Self-pacing and performance in a personalized system of instruction.Journal of College Science Teaching 5(4),230–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruithirds, J., & Hanna, M. (1997).Programmed instruction and interactive multimedia: a third consideration. (ERIC Document Research Reproduction Service No. ED 439 464)

  • Fell, J. P. (1989). The Keller plan in nurse education.Vocational Aspect of Education 41(10), 65–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flagg, B.N. (1990).Formative Evaluation for Educational Technologies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galitz, W.O. (1997).The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques. New York, NY: Wiley Computer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (1999).Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hereford, S.M. (1979). The Keller plan within a conventional academic environment: An empirical “meta-analytic” study.Engineering Education.70(3), 250–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. (1974). Ten years of self-paced instruction.Teaching in Psychology 1(1), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F.S. (1981). PSI and educational reform.Journal of College Science Teaching.11(1), 37–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F.S., & Sherman, J.G. (1982) The PSI handbook: Essays on Personalized Instruction. Lawrence, KS: International Society for Individualized Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, J.E., Morrison, G.R., & Ross, S.M. (1998).Designing effective instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C., & Cohen, P.A. (1979). A metaanalysis of outcome studies of Keller’s personalized system instruction.American Psychologist. 34(41), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, L. (2000a). Designing the instructional interface.Computers in Human Behavior 16(2), 162–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, L. (2000b). Three perceptual principles for instructional interface design.Educational Technology, 40(1), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, R.L. (1977). The traditional and non-traditional learning methods.Journal of Personalized Instruction.2(1),114–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G., Ross, S., & Kemp, J. (2001).Designing Effective Instruction. Ed. 3rd New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993).Usability Engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C.M., & Nelson, L.M. (1997).A New Paradigm of ISD. In R.M. Branch & B.B. Minor (Eds.),Educational Media and Technology Yearbook (pp. 24–35). (Vol. 22). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited Incorporated, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossett, A. (1999). First things fast: A handbook for performance analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer/

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, B. (1991). Usability-context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In B. Shackel & S. Richardson (Eds.),Human Factors for Informatics Usability, (pp. 21–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J.G. (1992). Reflections on PSI: Good news and Bad.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.25(1), 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessmer, M. (1993).Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations: Improving the Quality of Education and Training. London: Kogan Page Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, L.L., & Betts, K.S. (1999). What’s in it for me? Incentives for faculty participation in distance education.Journal of Distance Education 14(2), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lohr, L., Javeri, M., Mahoney, C. et al. Using rapid application development to improve the usability of a preservice teacher technology course. ETR&D 51, 41–55 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504525

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504525

Keywords

Navigation