Skip to main content
Log in

Supporting excellence in technology through communities of learners

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers to use Technology Project (PT3) at the University of Pittsburgh encompasses public and private schools, a nonprofit educational consortium, industry partners and the University of Pittsburgh. The purposes of the project are (a) to encourage throughtful technology integration by mentor teachers, student teachers and university faculty; and (b) to support innovation, adoption and resource sharing by creating Collaborative Communities of Learners (CCOLs). These goals are achieved by engaging participants in a number of activities, including individualized training, summer camp, monthly professional development meetings, a Celebration of Successes for sharing projects, and technology skill workshops. Support is also provided through project on-site support staff, an interactive Web site, minigrants, and loans of equipment and software. Evaluation of the project is an ongoing iterative process. Data are collected through self-reporting instruments, event evaluations, journal entries, project checklists, videotaped presentations, and interviews. Currently, in its third year of four including a pilot year, the project involves 98 mentor teachers and 20 university faculty. This project documents the importance of technology support people who have excellent interpersonal skills, experience with instruction and the flexibility to adjust strategies to adopter needs, skills, and personalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow. (1999). Apple learning professional development design principles. InApple Classrooms of Tomorrow (ACOT): Vol. 1999/2002.

  • Beattie, M. (1995). New prospects for teacher education: Narrative ways of knowing teaching and teacher learning.Education Research, 37(1), 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W.E., Millett, R. & Nelson, C.A., (2000).Challenges to the role of evaluation in supporting organizational learning in foundations. Unpublished article. Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.),Classroom Lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J.C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188–228). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1(Jan–Feb)), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. (2002).Experiences of school of education faculty members in learning to use computer technology: Positive supports as well as barriers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. & Ozgül, S. (2002).Intensive technology teacher training project: Lessons learned. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, E., & Lemke, C. (1999).Professional Competency Continuum. Professional Skills for the digital age classroom. Milken Exchange on Education Technology. Santa Monica, CA. [online: www.milkenexchange.org]

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B.A. (1996).Examining the essential elements of a community of learners in a middle grade science classroom. Dissertation (Ph.D.), University of Michigan.

  • Dewey, J. (1933). Why reflective thinking must be an educational aim. InHow we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (pp. 17–34). New York, NY: D.C. Health and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, R. & Eaker, R. (1998).Professional Learning Communities At Work: Best Practices For Enhancing Student Achievement. Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G.D., & Richardson, V. (1993). The elicitation and reconstruction of practical arguments in teaching.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(2), 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (Eds.). (1992). Understanding teacher development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S.M. (1997).Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2000a).National Educational Technology Standards for Students: Connecting curriculum and technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2000b).National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenlink, P.M., & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. (2001). Case stories of facilitating professional development.Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 705–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (1998)Who moved my cheese? An amazing way to deal with change in your work and in your life. Carlsbad, CA.

  • Knowles, J.G., & Holt-Reynolds, D. (1991). Shaping pedagogies through personal histories in preservice teacher education.Teachers College Record, 93(1), 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., & Meyer, K.M. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers.The Elementary School Journal, 194(5), 517–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, C. (1991). Narrative reflections on practical actions: Two learning experiments in reflective storytelling. In D.A. Schön (Ed.).The Reflective Turn: Case Studies In And On Educational Practice (pp. 235–257). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain, T. & Jukes, I. (2001).Windows on the future: Education in the age of technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCotter, S.S. (2001). Collaborative groups as professional development.Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 685–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenda, M., et al. (1970).Diffusion of innovations in education simulation game. Bloomington IN: University Consortium for Instructional Development and Technology (UCIDT), Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, M.S. (2000).Professional Learning Communities: An ongoing exploration. Austin, TX: South-west Educational Development Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S., Magnusson, S.J., Marano, N., Ford, D., & Brown, N. (1998). Designing a Community of Practice: Principles and Practices of the GIsML Community.Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prawat, R.S. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective.American Journal of Education, 354–395.

  • Rogers, E.M. (1995).Diffusion of innovations. Fourth Edition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roup, R.R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (Eds.). (1992).LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C, & Dwyer, D. (1997).Teaching with technology. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S.B. (1993).The case for change: Rethinking the preparation of educators. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S.B. (1996).Revisiting the culture of the school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1987).Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seels, B.B., & Richey, R.C. (1994).Instructional Technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T.J. (1994).Building community in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloway, E., Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P., & Marx, R. (1996). Technological support for teachers transitioning to project-based science practices. In T. Koschmann (Ed.),CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talsma, V., Messineo, L., Seels, B., Balach, C., & Campbell, S., (2002 April),“Here, I am not afraid to admit what I don’t know:” Case stories from a collaborative community of learners preparing teachers to use technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA [On-line]. Available: http://www.pitt.edu/vtalsma/papers/pt3ccol

  • Wald, P.J. & Castleberry, M.S. (2000).Educators as learners: Creating a professional learning community in your school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Curriculum Supervision and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulich, J., Bean, T.W., & Herrick, J. (1992). Charting stages of pre-service teacher development and reflection in a multicultural community through dialogue journal analysis.Teaching and Teacher Education.8(4), 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

They are coinvestigators for the PT3 project described in this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seels, B., Campbell, S. & Talsma, V. Supporting excellence in technology through communities of learners. ETR&D 51, 91–104 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504520

Keywords

Navigation