Advertisement

Technology collaboratives for simultaneous renewal in teacher education

  • Ann D. Thompson
  • Denise A. Schmidt
  • Niki E. Davis
Development

Abstract

The Technology Collaboratives (TechCo) for Simultaneous Renewal in Teacher Education project, based in John Goodlad’s theory of simultaneous renewal (1994), is described. The project is a systemic approach to using technology to help facilitate renewal in both teacher education and K-12 schools. Project features include cohort groups of students with laptop computers, faculty development programs, teacher development programs for collaborating schools, and curriculum development in both teacher education and K-6 partner schools. Evaluation for the project uses a descriptive approach that includes a model developed for the project to better evaluate the systemic change goals of the project. Evaluation results suggest changing attitudes and capabilities of preservice teachers, major course changes from faculty, plus the strength of the mentoring model for faculty and teacher development. The project is beginning to demonstrate simultaneous renewal of teacher education and four K-6 schools.

Keywords

Teacher Education Preservice Teacher Teacher Education Program Inservice Teacher Project Leader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, H.J. (1994). How examplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321.Google Scholar
  2. Cadiero-Kaplan, K. (1999). Integrating technology: Issues for traditional and constructivist pedagogies.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 15(2), 14–18.Google Scholar
  3. CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (1999).School technology and readiness report. Professional development: A link to better learning. Washington DC: CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED428747)Google Scholar
  4. Chuang, H., Thompson, A., & Schmidt, D. (2002). Faculty technology mentoring program: Major trends in the literature.Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2002. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, J.M., & Bull, G.L. (1997). Technology and teacher education: Past practice and recommended directions.Action in Teacher Education, 19(2), 97–106.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, N.E. (1997). Telematics applied to the training of teachers: a survey via video conferencing across Europe.European Journal of Teacher Education, 20(1), 49–60.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, N.E., Hawkes, M., Heineke, W., & Veen, W. (2001). Multiple perspectives on evaluation of new technology in education and teacher education. In W. Heineke, L. Blaise, & J. Willis (Eds.),Methods of evaluating educational technology (Vol. 1) ofResearch methods in educational technology. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Davis N.E., & Prosser D. (1999).Telematics for teacher training. Retrieved November, 2001 from T3 Project Showcase Web site: http://telematics.ex.ac.uk/T3Google Scholar
  9. Dawson, K., & Nonis, A. (2000). Preservice teachers’ experiences in a K-12/university technology-based field initiative.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(1), 4–12.Google Scholar
  10. Dawson, K., Swain, C., Johnson, N. & Ring, G. (2002).Partnership strategies for systemic integration of technology in teacher education. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  11. Duffy, T., & Jonassen, D. (Eds.) (1992).Constructivism and technology of Instruction: A conversation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Ellsworth, J.B. (2000).Surviving change: A survey of educational change models. ERIC: Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Techhnology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444597)Google Scholar
  13. Fly, D. (1990). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations.Journal of Research of Computing in Education, 23(2), 298–305.Google Scholar
  14. Espinoza, S., & McKinzie, L. (1994). Internet activities open new worlds for educators.Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 1994, 666–670. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  15. Goodlad, J. (1994).Educational Renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, G., & Hord, S. (1987).Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, State University of New York-Albany.Google Scholar
  17. International Society for Technology in Education (1998).Survey: Information technology in teacher education. Retrieved from the International Society of Technology in Education Web site: http://www.iste.orgGoogle Scholar
  18. Kemis M. & Walker, D. (2001, January/February). The a-e-I-o-u approach to program evaluation.Journal of College Student Development, 41, 119–122.Google Scholar
  19. Lane, C., & Cassidy, S. (1994) The role of technology in the systemic reform of education and training.ED Journal, 8(6), 1–22.Google Scholar
  20. Milken Exchange on Education Technology. (1999).Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  21. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1997).Technology and the new professional teacher: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Washington D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  22. Office of Technology Assessment. (1995).Teachers and technology: Making the connection. (Report no. OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  23. Panel on Educational Technology. (1997).Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Rogers, E. (1995).The diffusion of innovations. (4th Ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997).Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  26. Schmidt, D.A. (1991)Iowa survey of computer-related technology use by K-12 teachers. Unpublished thesis, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  27. Schmidt, D.A. (1995).Use and integration of computer-related technology in teaching by preservice teacher education faculty. Unpublished dissertation, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  28. Schrum, L. (1994). First steps into the information age: Technology infusion in a teacher education program.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 10(4), 12–14.Google Scholar
  29. Sheingold, K., & Hadley, M. (1990).Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Center for Technology in Education, Bank Street college of Education.Google Scholar
  30. Silag B., & Fields A. (2001).Creating the engaged university. Iowa’s model for change. Vision 2020 education for tomorrow. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Extension. 65–76.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, J., & Southern, W.T. (1999). The exceptional learner: Preparing all teachers for tomorrow’s classrooms.Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 15(3), 17–22.Google Scholar
  32. Somekh B. & Davis N.E. (Eds.). (1997).Using IT effectively in teaching and learning: Studies in pre-service and in-service teacher education. Routledge: London and New York.Google Scholar
  33. Thompson, A. (in press).Technology student mentors for faculty: Stories from the field. Information Age Publishing: Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, A. & Schmidt, D. (2002). An award winning technology in teacher education program: Description of a comprehensive approach.Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2002. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  35. Thompson, A.D., Schmidt, D.A., & Hadjiyianni, E. (1995). A three year program to infuse technology throughout a teacher education program.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 3(1), 13–24.Google Scholar
  36. Willis, J.W., & Mehlinger, H.D. (1996). Information Technology and Teacher Education in J. Sikula, T.J. Buttery, & E. Guyton, (Eds.),Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2nd ed., pp. 978–1029). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann D. Thompson
    • 1
  • Denise A. Schmidt
    • 1
  • Niki E. Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching at Iowa State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations