Abstract
The positive effects of collaborative learning in a face-to-face environment are well known. However, little empirical research exists to determine if such effects transfer to a computer-mediated environment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of computer-mediated collaboration on solving ill-defined problems. Participants first worked through a Web-based instructional program that taught them a four-step problem-solving process. Then they worked in computer-mediated dyads or alone to apply the steps to solve a realistic problem scenario. Results indicated that participants who worked in computer-mediated collaborative dyads performed significantly better than did participants who worked alone. The results also indicated that dyads spent significantly more time than participants in the individual treatment. Both treatment groups had positive attitudes toward working collaboratively, Internet-based instruction, and transfer of problem-solving skills. Implications for the implementation of computer-mediated collaboration in distance learning are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelskold, G. (1999c7). Problem-based distance learning of energy issues via computer network.Distance Education, 20(1): 129–143.
Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation.MIS Quarterly, June, 159–174.
Brandon, D & Hollingshead, A.B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups.Communication-Education, 48(2), 109–126.
Camin, C., Glicken, A., Hall, M., Quarantillo, B., & Merenstein, G. (2001). Evaluation of electronic discussion groups as a teaching/learning strategy in an evidence-based medicine course: A pilot study.Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice, 14(1), p.21.
Chang, K.Y.R. & Smith, F. (1991). Cooperative learning and CALL/IVD in beginning Spanish: An experiment.Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 205–211.
Doran, M.S., & Klein, J.D. (1999). Implementing individual and small group learning structures with a computer simulation.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 97–110.
Edens, K.M. (2000). Promoting communication, inquiry, and reflection in an early practicum experience via an on-line discussion group.Action in Teacher Education, 22(2A), 14–23.
Flynn, A.E., & Klein, J.D. (2001). The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment.Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 71–86.
Hall, D. (1997). Computer mediated communication in post-compulsory teacher education.Open Learning, 12(3), 54–56.
Hillman, D. C. A. (1999). A new method for analyzing patterns of interaction.The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 37–47.
Hooper, S. (1992). Effects of peer interaction during computer-based mathematics instruction.Journal of Educational Research, 85(3), 180–189.
Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M.J. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 39(3), 27–40.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Holubec, E.J. (1990).Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, C.A. (1991).Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Washington, D.C.: School of Education and Human Development, The George Washington University.
Johnson, S.D., & Chung, S.P. (1999). The effect of thinking aloud pair problem solving (TAPPS) on the troubleshooting ability of aviation technician students.Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37(1), 7–25.
Johnson, V.L. (1996), Toward a global classroom using computer-mediated communications at UAA. University of Alaska Anchorage,Vocational Teacher Education Research Report, (Eric document # ED356759)
Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
Jonassen, D., Prevish, T., Christy, D., & Stavrulaki, E. (1999). Learning to solve problems on the Web: Aggregate planning in a business management course.Distance Education, 20(1), 49–63.
Kinzie, M.B., Hrabe, M.B., & Larsen, V.A. (1998). An instructional design case event: Exploring issues in professional practice.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 53–71.
Klein, J.D., & Pridemore, D.R. (1994). Effects of orienting activities and practice on achievement, continuing motivation, and student behaviors in a cooperative learning environment.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 41–54.
Kruger, L.J., & Cohen, S. (1996). Using the Internet to extend training in team problem solving.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28(2), 248–253.
Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1): 73–86.
Levin, B.B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers thinking about cases.Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63–79.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis.Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521.
McIsaac, M.S., & Ralston, K.D. (1996). Teaching at a distance using computer conferencing.Tech Trends, 41(6), 48–53.
Mergendoller, J.R., Bellisimo, Y., & Maxwell, N.L. (2000). Comparing problem-based learning and traditional instruction in high school economics.Journal of Educational Research, 93(6), 374–383.
Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (1996).Distance education: A systems view. New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Murphy, K.L., & Collins, M.P. (1997). Development of communication conventions in instructional electronic chats.Journal of Distance Education, 12(1), 177–200.
Naidu, S., & Oliver, M. (1999). Critical incident-based computer supported collaborative learning.Instructional Science, 27(5), 329–354.
Phye, G.D. (2001). Problem-solving instruction and problem-solving transfer: The correspondence issue.Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 571–578.
Savenye, W.C. (2001).Evaluating Web-based learning systems and software. Paper presented at the Conference on Instructional Design: Addressing the Challenges of Learning Through Technology and Curriculum, Albert-Ludwigs Universitat, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, May 2001.
Sherman, G.P., & Klein, J.D. (1995). The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(4), 5–24.
Shulman, J. (Ed.). (1992),Case method in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000).Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill an Imprint of Prentice Hall.
Slavin, R. (1993). Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives.Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 535–552.
Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets.Educational Leadership, 50(7), 25–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
During article preparation, he was a PhD student at Arizona State University (ASU), Tempe.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uribe, D., Klein, J.D. & Sullivan, H. The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving III-defined problems. ETR&D 51, 5–19 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504514
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504514