Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving III-defined problems

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The positive effects of collaborative learning in a face-to-face environment are well known. However, little empirical research exists to determine if such effects transfer to a computer-mediated environment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of computer-mediated collaboration on solving ill-defined problems. Participants first worked through a Web-based instructional program that taught them a four-step problem-solving process. Then they worked in computer-mediated dyads or alone to apply the steps to solve a realistic problem scenario. Results indicated that participants who worked in computer-mediated collaborative dyads performed significantly better than did participants who worked alone. The results also indicated that dyads spent significantly more time than participants in the individual treatment. Both treatment groups had positive attitudes toward working collaboratively, Internet-based instruction, and transfer of problem-solving skills. Implications for the implementation of computer-mediated collaboration in distance learning are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelskold, G. (1999c7). Problem-based distance learning of energy issues via computer network.Distance Education, 20(1): 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation.MIS Quarterly, June, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, D & Hollingshead, A.B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups.Communication-Education, 48(2), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camin, C., Glicken, A., Hall, M., Quarantillo, B., & Merenstein, G. (2001). Evaluation of electronic discussion groups as a teaching/learning strategy in an evidence-based medicine course: A pilot study.Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice, 14(1), p.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.Y.R. & Smith, F. (1991). Cooperative learning and CALL/IVD in beginning Spanish: An experiment.Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, M.S., & Klein, J.D. (1999). Implementing individual and small group learning structures with a computer simulation.Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edens, K.M. (2000). Promoting communication, inquiry, and reflection in an early practicum experience via an on-line discussion group.Action in Teacher Education, 22(2A), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, A.E., & Klein, J.D. (2001). The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment.Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. (1997). Computer mediated communication in post-compulsory teacher education.Open Learning, 12(3), 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, D. C. A. (1999). A new method for analyzing patterns of interaction.The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S. (1992). Effects of peer interaction during computer-based mathematics instruction.Journal of Educational Research, 85(3), 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M.J. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 39(3), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Holubec, E.J. (1990).Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, C.A. (1991).Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Washington, D.C.: School of Education and Human Development, The George Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.D., & Chung, S.P. (1999). The effect of thinking aloud pair problem solving (TAPPS) on the troubleshooting ability of aviation technician students.Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37(1), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V.L. (1996), Toward a global classroom using computer-mediated communications at UAA. University of Alaska Anchorage,Vocational Teacher Education Research Report, (Eric document # ED356759)

  • Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., Prevish, T., Christy, D., & Stavrulaki, E. (1999). Learning to solve problems on the Web: Aggregate planning in a business management course.Distance Education, 20(1), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M.B., Hrabe, M.B., & Larsen, V.A. (1998). An instructional design case event: Exploring issues in professional practice.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J.D., & Pridemore, D.R. (1994). Effects of orienting activities and practice on achievement, continuing motivation, and student behaviors in a cooperative learning environment.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, L.J., & Cohen, S. (1996). Using the Internet to extend training in team problem solving.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28(2), 248–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1): 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B.B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers thinking about cases.Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis.Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIsaac, M.S., & Ralston, K.D. (1996). Teaching at a distance using computer conferencing.Tech Trends, 41(6), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergendoller, J.R., Bellisimo, Y., & Maxwell, N.L. (2000). Comparing problem-based learning and traditional instruction in high school economics.Journal of Educational Research, 93(6), 374–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (1996).Distance education: A systems view. New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K.L., & Collins, M.P. (1997). Development of communication conventions in instructional electronic chats.Journal of Distance Education, 12(1), 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidu, S., & Oliver, M. (1999). Critical incident-based computer supported collaborative learning.Instructional Science, 27(5), 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phye, G.D. (2001). Problem-solving instruction and problem-solving transfer: The correspondence issue.Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 571–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savenye, W.C. (2001).Evaluating Web-based learning systems and software. Paper presented at the Conference on Instructional Design: Addressing the Challenges of Learning Through Technology and Curriculum, Albert-Ludwigs Universitat, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, May 2001.

  • Sherman, G.P., & Klein, J.D. (1995). The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(4), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, J. (Ed.). (1992),Case method in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000).Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill an Imprint of Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. (1993). Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives.Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets.Educational Leadership, 50(7), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

During article preparation, he was a PhD student at Arizona State University (ASU), Tempe.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uribe, D., Klein, J.D. & Sullivan, H. The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving III-defined problems. ETR&D 51, 5–19 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504514

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504514

Keywords

Navigation