A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media

  • Robert A. Reiser


This is the first of a two-part article that will discuss the history of the field of instructional design and technology in the United States. A definition of the field is provided and the major features of the definition are identified. A rational for using instructional design and technology as the label for the field is also presented. Events in the history of instructional media, from the early 1900s to the present day, are described. The birth of school museums, the visual and audiovisual instruction movements, the use of media during World War II, and the interest in instructional television, computers, and the Internet are among the topics discussed. The article concludes with a summarization of the effects media have had on instructional practices, and a prediction regarding the effect computers, the Internet, and other digital media will have on such practices over the next decade.


Instructional Design Instructional Practice Instructional Technology Teaching Machine Instructional Television 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, C. (1962). Technology in American education: 1650–1900 (Report No. OE-34018). Washington, DC: Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R.E., & Ronnkvist, A. (1999).The presence of computers in American schools: Teaching, learning and computing: 1998 national survey (Report #2). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 430 548).Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R.C., & Hansen, D.N. (1966). Computer-assisted instruction in initial reading: The Stanford project.Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassi, L.J., & Van Buren, M.E. (1999). Sharpening the leading edge.Training and Development, 53(1), 23–33.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, H.J. (1998). Running to catch a moving train: Schools and information technologies.Theory into Practice, 37(1), 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlo, D.K. (1963). “You are in the people business.”Audiovisual Instruction, 8, 372–381.Google Scholar
  7. Blakely, R.J. (1979).To serve the public interest: Educational broadcasting in the United States. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carnegie Commission on Educational Television (1967).Public television: A program for action. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Carpenter, C.R., & Greenhill, L.P. (1956).Instructional film research reports: Vol. 2 (Technical Report No. 269-7-61). Port Washington, NY: U.S. Navy Special Devices Center.Google Scholar
  10. Carr, S. (2000, August 18). Army bombshell rocks distance education.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46,Google Scholar
  11. Center for Social Organization of Schools (1983). School uses of microcomputers: Reports from a national survey (Issue no. 1). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, R.E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Commission on Instructional Technology (1970).To improve learning: An evaluation of instructional technology (Vol. 1), New York: Rowker.Google Scholar
  15. Cuban, L. (1986).Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dale, E. (1946).Audio-visual methods in teaching (1st ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  17. Dale, E. (1953), What does it mean to communicate?AV Communication Review, 1, 3–5.Google Scholar
  18. Ely, D.P. (Ed.) (1963). The changing role of the audiovisual process in education: A definition and glossary of related terms.AV Communication Review,11(1).Google Scholar
  19. Ely, D.P. (1970). Toward a philosophy of instructional technology.British Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 81–94.Google Scholar
  20. Finn, J.D. (1954). Direction in AV communication research.AV Communication Review, 2, 83–102.Google Scholar
  21. Finn, J.D. (1972). The emerging technology of education In R.J. McBeath (Ed.),Extending education through technology: Selected writings by James D. Finn. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Google Scholar
  22. Gordon, G.N. (1970).Classroom television: New frontiers in ITV, New York: Hastings House.Google Scholar
  23. Gumpert, G. (1967). Closed-circuit television in training and education. In A.E. Koenig & R.B. Hill (Eds.),The farther vision: Educational television today, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hawkridge, D. (1999). Cost-effective support for university students via the Web?Association for Learning Technology Journal, 6(3), 24–29.Google Scholar
  25. Heinich, R. (1970) Technology and the management of instruction (Association for Educational Communication and Technology Monograph No. 4), Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Google Scholar
  26. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D. & Smaldino (1999).Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Hezel, R.T. (1980). Public broadcasting: Can it teach?Journal of Communication, 30, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoban, C.F., Sr., Hoban, C.F., Jr., & Zissman, S.B. (1937).Visualizing the curriculum. New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
  29. Industry Report 1999 (1999).Training,36(10), 37–81.Google Scholar
  30. Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kozma, R.B. (1994). Will media influence learning: Reframing the debate.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levie, W.H., & Dickie, K.E. (1973). The analysis and application of media. In R.M.W. Travers (Ed.)Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, B.N., & Pask, G. (1965). The theory and practice of adaptive teaching systems. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Teaching machines and programmed learning II: Data and directions. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  34. Lewis, L., Snow, K., Farris, E., Levin, D. & Greene, B. (1999).Distance education at postsecondary institutions: 1997–98 (NCES 2000-013), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  35. Lumsdaine, A.A. (Ed.) (1961).Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science-National Research Council.Google Scholar
  36. Lumsdaine, A.A. (1963). Instruments and media of instruction. In N.L. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  37. Lumsdaine, A.A. (1964). Educational technology, programmed learning, and instructional science. In E.R. Hilgard (Ed.),Theories of learning and instruction: The sixty-third year book of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. May, M. A., & Lumsdaine, A. A. (1958).Learning from films. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. McCluskey, F.D. (1981). DVI, DAVI, AECT: A long view. In J.W. Brown & S.N. Brown (Eds.),Educational media yearbook: 1981, Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  40. Meierhenry, W.C. (1980). Instructional theory: From behaviorism to humanism to synergism.Instructional Innovator, 25(1), 16–18.Google Scholar
  41. Moore, M.G. (1989, April). Three modes of interaction. InIssues in instructional interactivity. Forum conducted at the meeting of the National University Continuing Education Association, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
  42. Morgan, J.E. (1932). Introduction. In B.H. Darrow,Radio: The assistant teacher. Columbus, OH: R.H. Adams.Google Scholar
  43. Office of Technology Assessment (1995).Teachers & technology: making the connection, Washington, DC: Office of Technology AssessmentGoogle Scholar
  44. Olsen, J.R., & Bass, V. B. (1982). The application of performance technology in the military: 1960–1980.Performance and Instruction, 21(6), 32–36.Google Scholar
  45. Pagliaro, L.A. (1983). The history and development of CAI: 1926–1981, an overview.Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29(1), 75–84.Google Scholar
  46. Papert, S. (1984). New theories for new learnings.School Psychology Review, 13(4), 422–428.Google Scholar
  47. Pask, G. (1960). Electronic keyboard teaching machines. In A.A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.),Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  48. Reiser, R.A. (1987). Instructional technology: A history. In R.M. Gagné (Ed.), Instructional technology: Foundations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  49. Reiser, R.A. (in press). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In R.A. Reiser & J.V. Dempsey (Eds.),Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  50. Reiser, R.A., & Dempsey, J.V. (in press).Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Reiser, R.A., & Ely, D.P. (1997). The field of educational technology as reflected through its definitions.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reiser, R.A., & Gagné, R.M. (1983).Selecting media for instruction, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  53. Rossett, A., & Donello, J.F. (1999)Knowledge management for training professionals (Online). Available: (2000, November 3).Google Scholar
  54. Saettler, P. (1968).A history of instructional technology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  55. Saettler, P. (1990).The evolution of American educational technology, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  56. Schramm, W. (1977).Big media, little media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Seels, B.B., & Richey, R.C. (1994).Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field, Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.Google Scholar
  58. Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949).The mathematical theory of communication, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  59. Silber, K.H. (1981). Some implications of the history of educational technology: We’re all in this together. In J.W. Brown & S.N. Brown (Eds.),Educational media yearbook: 1981, Littleton, CO, Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  60. Stevens, G.H., & Stevens, E.F. (1995).Designing electronic performance support tools. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  61. Stolorow, L.M., & Davis, D. (1965). Teaching machines and computer-assisted systems. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Teaching machines and programmed learning, II: Data and directions, Washington, DC: National Education Association.Google Scholar
  62. Suppes, P., & Macken, E. (1978). The historical path from research and development to operational use of CAI.Educational Technology, 18(4), 9–12.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, B.J. (1967). The development of instructional television. In A.E. Koenig & R.B. Hill (Eds.),The farther vision: Educational television today. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  64. Tyler, R.W. (1975). Have educational reforms since 1950 created quality education?Viewpoints, 51(2), 35–57.Google Scholar
  65. Visual Education. (1908). Meadville, PA: Keystone View Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Reiser
    • 1
  1. 1.Instructional Systems program at Florida State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations