Advertisement

International journal of mine water

, Volume 9, Issue 1–4, pp 269–276 | Cite as

Acid mine water treatment using engineered wetlands

  • Robert L. P. Kleinmann
Article

Abstract

During the last two decades, the United States mining industry has greatly increased the amount it spends on pollution control. The application of biotechnology to mine water can reduce the industry's water treatment costs (estimated at over a million dollars a day) and improve water quality in streams and rivers adversely affected by acidic mine water draining from abandoned mines.

Biological treatment of mine waste water is typically conducted in a series of small excavated ponds that resemble, in a superficial way, a small marsh area. The ponds are engineered to first facilitate bacterial oxidation of iron; ideally, the water then flows through a composted organic substrate that supports a population of sulfate-reducing bacteria. The latter process raises the pH. During the past four years, over 400 wetland water treatment systems have been built on mined lands as a result of research by the U.S. Bureau of Mines. In general, mine operators find that the wetlands reduce chemical treatment costs enough to repay the cost of wetland construction in less than a year.

Actual rates of iron removal at field sites have been used to develop empirical sizing criteria based on iron loading and pH. If the pH is 6 or above, the wetland area (m2) required is equivalent to the iron load (grams/day) divided by 10. Theis requirement doubles at a pH of 4 to 5. At a pH below 4, the iron load (grams/day) should be divided by 2 to estimate the area required (m2).

Keywords

Mine Water Acid Mine Drainage Mine Drainage Bacterial Sulfate Reduction Acid Mine Water 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burris, J.E., D.W. Gerber, and L.E. McHerron (1984). Removal of iron and manganese from water bySphagnum moss. In J. E. Burris (Ed.)Treatment of Mine Drainage by Wetlands, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  2. Chan, E., T. A. Bursztynsky, N. Hantzsche, and Y. J. Litwin. (1982). The Use of Wetlands for Water Pollution Control. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/2-82-036, NTIS PB83-107466, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
  3. Gale, N.L. (1985). The role of algae and other microorganisms in metal detoxification and environmental cleanup. In Workshop on Biotechnology, Metal-refining and Fossil Fuel Processing Industries (Abstract), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Gignac, L. D., and P. J., Beckett (1986). The effect of smelting operations on peatlands near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Canadian J. of Botany, Vol. 64, pp. 1138–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Girts, M. A., and R. L. P. Kleinmann (1986). Constructed wetlands for treatment of acid mine drainage: a preliminary review. In D. H. Graves (Ed.), Proc. of the 1986 National Symp. on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology, and Reclamation, University of Kentucky, KY, pp. 165–171.Google Scholar
  6. Girts, M. A., R. L. P. Kleinmann, and P. M. Erickson (1987). Performance data onTypha andSphagnum wetlands constructed to treat coal mine drainage. In Proc. of the 8th Annual Surface Mine Drainage Task Force Symp., Morgantown, WV.Google Scholar
  7. Hedin, R. S. (1989). Treatment of acid coal mine drainage with constructed wetlands. In Wetlands Ecology, Productivity and Values: Emphasis on Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Academy of Science (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Hedin, R., and R. Nairn (1990). Sizing and performance of constructed wetlands: case studies. Proceedings, 1990 Mining and Reclamation. Conference and Exhibition, Vol. 2, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, pp. 385–392.Google Scholar
  9. Herlihy, A. T., A. L. Mills, G. M. Hornberger, and A. E. Bruckner (1987). The importance of sediment sulfate reduction to the sulfate budget of an impoundment receiving acid mine drainage. Water Resources Res., Vol. 23, pp. 287–292.Google Scholar
  10. Huntsman, B. E., J. G. Solch, and M. D. Porter (1978). Utilization ofSphagnum species dominated bog for coal acid mine drainage abatement. In Geol. Soc. Am. (91st Annual Meeting) Abstracts, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 322 p.Google Scholar
  11. Kalin, M. (1988). Ecological engineering and biological polishing: its application in close-out of acid generating waste management areas. In 1988 Mine Drainage and Surface Mine Reclamation, Vol. 1: Mine Water and Mine Waste, U.S. Bureau of Mines, IC 9183, Pittsburgh, PA, 399 p.Google Scholar
  12. Kalin, M., and R. O. Van Everdingen (1987). Ecological engineering: biological and geochemical aspects, phase 1 experiment. In Proceedings Acid Mine Drainage Seminar, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, pp. 565–590.Google Scholar
  13. Kepler, D. A. (1986). Manganese removal from mine drainage by artificial wetland construction. In Proc. of the 8th Annual National Abandoned Mine Lands Conference, Billings, MT, pp. 74–80.Google Scholar
  14. Kleinmann, R. L. P., T. O. Tiernan, J. G. Solch and R. L. Harris (1983). A low-cost, low-maintenance treatment system for acid mine drainage usingSphagnum moss and limestone. In S. B. Carpenter and R. W. Devore (Eds.), Proc. of the 1983 Symp. on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology and Reclamation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, pp. 241–245.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, J., I. Jonasson, and W. Goodfellow (1984). Metal accumulation by bryophytes in some zinc-rich blanket bogs, Selwyn Mountains, Yukon Territory. canadian J. Botany, Vol. 62, pp. 722–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McIntire, P. E., and H. M. Edenborn (1990). The use of bacterial sulfate reduction in the treatment of drainage from coal mines. Proceedings, 1990 Mining and Reclamation Conference and Exhibition, Vol. 2, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, pp. 409–416.Google Scholar
  17. Satake, K. (1977). Microbial sulphate reduction in a volcanic acid lake having a pH 1.8 to 2.0. Japanese J. of Limnology, Vol. 38, pp. 33–35.Google Scholar
  18. Sencindiver, J. C., and D. K. Bhumbla (1988). Effects of cattails (Typha) on metal removal from mine drainage. In 1988 Mine Drainage and Surface Mine Reclamation, Volume I: Mine Water and Mine Waste, U.S. BuMines IC 9183, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 359–369.Google Scholar
  19. Spratt, A. K. and R. K. Weider (1988). Growth responses and iron uptake inSphagnum plants and their relations to acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment. In 1988 Mine Drainage and Surface Mine Reclamation, Volume I: Mine Water and Mine Waste, Bureau of Mines IC 9183, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 279–286.Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, G. J., and A. A. Crowder (1983a). Uptake of accumulation of heavy metals byTypha latifolia. Canadian J. of botany, Vol. 61, pp. 63–73.Google Scholar
  21. Taylor, G. J., and A. A. Crowder (1983b). Uptake of accumulation of Cu, Ni and Fe byTypha latifolia grown in solution culture. Canadian J. of Botany, Vol. 61, pp. 1825–1830.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor, G. J., and A. A. Crowder (1984). Copper and Ni Tolerance inTypha latifolia clones from contaminated and uncontaminated Environments. Canadian J. of Botany, Vol. 62, pp. 1304–1308.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, G. J., A. A. Crowder, and R. Rodden (1984). Formation and morphology of an iron plaque on the roots ofTypha latifolia grown in a solution culture. Amer. J. Bot., Vol. 71, pp. 666–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wieder, R. K., and G. E. Lang (1982). Modification of acid mine drainage in a freshwater wetland. In B. R. McDonald (Ed.), Proc. of the Symp. on Wetlands of the Unglaciated Appalachian Region, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.Google Scholar
  25. Wieder, R. K., and G. E. Lang (1986). Fe, Al, Mn, and S chemistry ofSphagnum peat in four peatlands with different metal and sulfur input. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, Vol. 29, pp. 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. P. Kleinmann
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Bureau of Mines Pittsburgh Research CenterPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations