Abstract
Russian and Chinese national standards have been compared by exchanging hydrophones for calibration in the frequency range from 1 Hz to 630 kHz. The results agree very closely, which confirms that the estimates made of the errors in the two standards are reliable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. N. Golenkov and L. E. Pavlov,Izmer. Tekh., No. 5, 44 (1967).
IEC Standard:Hydrophone Calibration, Publ. 565, Geneva (1977).
A. N. Golenkov and S. M. Likhachev,Izmer. Tekh., No. 11, 57 (1994).
IEC Standard:Hydrophone Calibration: First Supplement to IEC 565, Publ. 565A, Geneva (1980).
S. P. Robinson, R. C. Preston, and D. R. Bacon,A National Intercomparison of Hydrophone Calibration Methods, NPL Acoustics Report Ac 116, June (1988).
IEC Standard:A Primary Standard Hydrophone, Publ. 500, Geneva (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Deceased.
Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 6, pp. 63–67, June, 2000.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Enyakov, A.M., Likhachev, S.M., Platonov, V.A. et al. Comparing hydrophone calibration results for Russian and Chinese standards. Meas Tech 43, 551–557 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02503549
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02503549