Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing hydrophone calibration results for Russian and Chinese standards

  • International Collaboration
  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

Abstract

Russian and Chinese national standards have been compared by exchanging hydrophones for calibration in the frequency range from 1 Hz to 630 kHz. The results agree very closely, which confirms that the estimates made of the errors in the two standards are reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. N. Golenkov and L. E. Pavlov,Izmer. Tekh., No. 5, 44 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. IEC Standard:Hydrophone Calibration, Publ. 565, Geneva (1977).

  3. A. N. Golenkov and S. M. Likhachev,Izmer. Tekh., No. 11, 57 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. IEC Standard:Hydrophone Calibration: First Supplement to IEC 565, Publ. 565A, Geneva (1980).

  5. S. P. Robinson, R. C. Preston, and D. R. Bacon,A National Intercomparison of Hydrophone Calibration Methods, NPL Acoustics Report Ac 116, June (1988).

  6. IEC Standard:A Primary Standard Hydrophone, Publ. 500, Geneva (1974).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Deceased.

Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 6, pp. 63–67, June, 2000.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Enyakov, A.M., Likhachev, S.M., Platonov, V.A. et al. Comparing hydrophone calibration results for Russian and Chinese standards. Meas Tech 43, 551–557 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02503549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02503549

Keywords

Navigation