Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How the duration of magnetic treatment affects the deposition rate of magnetized magnetite pulp

  • Physical and Chemical Principles of Beneficiation
  • Published:
Soviet Mining Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    It has been established that the degree of effect of the duration of pulp magnetization on its deposition rate depends on the intensity of the field in which magnetization and dilution of the magnetization and dilution of the magnetized product are effected.

  2. 2.

    The interrelation of the H and t factors is such that the effect of the magnetization duration on the pulp deposition rate increases with the field intensity.

  3. 3.

    It has been found that the t range in which the duration has an effect on pulp flocculation varies with the field intensity.

  4. 4.

    At sufficiently high intensities (more than 48–50 kA/m) the magnetization duration factor is very important and is often the only means of increasing the deposition rate of the flocculated pulp. This must be taken into account when it is necessary to speed up the deposition rate of diluted magnetized pulps.

  5. 5.

    Comparison of the results with practical pulp magnetization data (H=40–48 kA/m, t=0.15–0.2 sec) enables us to infer that the pulp magnetization time should be increased to 0.4–0.5 sec.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. V. G. Derkach and T. N. Galevskaya, “Magnetization and demagnetization of magnetite and ferrosilicium,” Gorn. Zh., No. 2 (1958).

  2. K. N. Lymar', “The effect of magnetic coagulation on wet sizing during beneficiation of finely crushed magnetite ores,” Nauch.-Tekhn. Byull. “Mekhanobr,” No. 3 (1956).

  3. W. H. Benson, J. A. Bartnik, and G. D. Rose, “Demagnetizing coils and magnetic flocculators used in magnetite beneficiation,” Mining Engng.,20, No. 8, 58–61 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. G. Derkach and K. N. Lymar', “Magnetic coagulation of finely disseminated magnetite ores and its effect on beneficiation,” Gorn. Zh., No. 12 (1955).

  5. V. V. Karmazin, V. I. Karmazin, and V. A. Vinkevich, Magnetic Regeneration and Separation during Beneficiation of Ores and Coal [in Russian], Nedra, Moscow (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. P. Nikolaenko, Precipitation of Magnetized Pulps [in Russian], Izd. UkrNIINTI, Kiev (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. V. Nalimov and V. A. Chernova, Statistical Methods of Planning Extremal Experiments [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. M. Batuner and P. E. Pozin, Mathematical Methods in Chemical Technique [in Russian], Goskhimizdat. Moscow (1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. V. I. Karmazin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. P. Nikolaenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Dnepropetrovsk Mining Institute. Translated from Fiziko-Tekhnicheskie Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopaemykh, No.2, pp. 79–86, March–April, 1970.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karmazin, V.I., Nikolaenko, V.P. How the duration of magnetic treatment affects the deposition rate of magnetized magnetite pulp. Soviet Mining Science 6, 195–200 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02502159

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02502159

Keywords

Search

Navigation