Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Institutional and technical constraints on faculty gross productivity in American doctoral universities

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholars disagree about the manner and extent of environmental structuring of university activities. This study supports arguments that the environment highly structures the relationships between faculty and the academic products of undergraduate instruction, graduate instruction, and research. Multiple correlation coefficients exceeded 90 percent for regressions of faculty size on counts of undergraduate and graduate enrollments and published articles for all universities classified as Research I or II or Doctoral I or II, demonstrating how constrained is doctoral faculty gross productivity in doctoral universities in the United States. Possible institutional and technical constraints are discussed. The regressions reveal economies of scale and economies of scope for some mixes of faculty academic activities, but not for others. Implications on productivity are explored for university type, control, and science emphasis. A typology for productivity studies is also outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D., Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage.American Sociological Review 39: 596–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, Leonard L. (1986). What characterizes a productive research department?Research in Higher Education 25(3): 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, Leonard L. (1991). Publication productivity in doctoral research departments: Interdisciplinary and intradisciplinary factors.Research in Higher Education 32(3): 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J., Blackman, Sue Anne Batey, and Wolff, Edward N. (1989)Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A. E., and Dutton, J. E. (1977). Carrer age and research-professional activities of academic scientists: Tests of alternative nonlinear models and some implications for higher education faculty policies.Journal of Higher Education 48(3): 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, Richard, and Blackburn, Robert (1990). Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulative advantage.Research in Higher Education 31(4): 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, Jeffrey P., and Blackburn, Robert T. (1989). Faculty Research Productivity 1972–1980. Development and Application of Constant Units of Measure. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. ERIC Document ED 313977.

  • Blackburn, Robert T., Behymer, Charles E., and Hall, David E. (1978). Research note: Correlates of faculty publications.Sociology of Education 51(2): 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, Howard R. (1980).The Costs of Higher Education: How Much Do Colleges and Universities Spend Per Student and How Much Should They Spend? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Ernest (1990).Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, John M., and Bayer, Alan E. (1986). Assessing faculty scholarly performance. In J. W. Creswell (ed.),Measuring Faculty Research Performance. New Directions for Institutional Research, 50, 25–42.

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1987).A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Burton R. (1983).The Higher Education System. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Burton R. (1987).The Academic Life. Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, Charles T., and Rothschild, Michael (1993). Introduction. In Charles T. Clotfelter and Michael Rothschild (eds.),Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Elchanan, Rhine, Sherrie L. W., and Santos, Maria C. (1989). Institutions of higher education as multi-product firms: Economies of scale and scope.The Review of Economics and Statistics 71(2): 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R. (1979).Fair Science. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, John Rogers (1934, reprinted 1959).Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, Hans, McMahon, Walter W., and Volkwein, J. Fredericks (1989). The Cost Structure of American Research Universities. Higher Education Research Report Number 5, September 1989 of the research group of the public finance section of the economics department of Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

  • Ellwein, Leon B. (1989). Assessing research productivity: Evaluating journal publication across academic departments.Academic Medicine 64(6): 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, J. K., Astin, H. S., and Bayer, A. E. (1970)Human Resources and Higher Education: Staff Report of the Commission on Human Resources and Advanced Education. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froomkin, Joseph (1990). The impact of changing levels of financial resources on the structure of colleges and universities. In Stephen A. Hoenack and Eileen L. Collins (eds.),The Economics of American Universities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, Donald (1980).The Economics of University Behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, Malcolm, and Siegfried, John J. (1991). Costs and enrollment. In Charles T. Clotfelter, Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Malcolm Getz, and John J. Siegfried (eds.),Economic Challenges in Higher Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, Jeffrey L., and To, Duc-Le (1992). Evaluating Academic Productivity and Quality. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Mimeo.

  • Golden, John, and Carstensen, Fred V. (1992a). Academic research productivity, department size and organization: Further results, rejoinder.Economics of Education Review 11(2): 169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, John, and Carstensen, Fred V. (1992b). Academic research productivity, department size and organization: Further results, comment.Economics of Education Review 11(2): 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, John, Carstensen, Fred V., Weiner, Paul, and Kane, Steve (1986). Publication performance of fifty top economics departments: A per capita analysis.Economics of Education Review 5(1): 83–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Wendell (1980)Institutional Economics. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havighurst, Robert J. (1985). Aging and productivity: The case of older faculty. In Shirley Clark and Darrell Lewis (eds.),Faculty Vitality and Institutional Productivity. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Estelle (1978). Product mix and cost disaggregation: A reinterpretation of the economics of higher education.Journal of Human Resources 13(2): 157–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, Estelle (1990). Decision processes and priorities in higher education. In Stephen A. Hoenack and Eileen L. Collins (eds.),The Economics of American Universities: Management, Operations, and Fiscal Environment, Chapter 4, pp. 77–106. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Lyle V., Lindzey, Gardner, and Coggeshall, Porter E. (1982).An Assessment of Quality-Related Characteristics of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, John M. Meador, Mark, and Walters, Stephen J. K. (1989). Academic research productivity, department size and organization: Further results.Economics of Education Review 8(4): 345–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W. (1986). Econometric methods for modeling producer behavior. In Z. Griliches and M. D. Intriligator (eds.),Handbook of Econometrics III, 1841–1915. Amsterdam and New York: North-Holland Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, Alison M., and Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1990). Do you get what you deserve? Factors affecting the relationship between productivity and pay.Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2): 258–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroc, Richard J. (1984). Comparing citation rates with other measures of scholarly productivity. Paper presented at the Joint Meeting of the American Educational Research Association and the Association for the Study of Higher Education, San Francisco, CA, October 28–30, 1984. ERIC Document ED253126.

  • Levin, Henry M. (1974). Measuring efficiency in educational production.Public Finance Quarterly 2 (January). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meador, Mark, Walters, Stephen J. K., and Jordan, John M. (1992).Economics of Education Review 11(2): 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., and Scott, W. Richard (eds.), (1983).Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Yoram (1977). Standards of research publication: Differences between the physical sciences and the natural sciences.Research in Higher Education 7(4): 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orczyk, Cynthia L. (1990). A model of scholastic development: Faculty socialization. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. ERIC Document ED 326107.

  • Pelz, D. C., and Andrews, F. M. 1976Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Michael, and White, Lawrence J. (1993). The university in the marketplace. In Charles T. Clotfelter and Michael Rothschild (eds.),Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Susan H., Fairweather, James S., Hendrickson, Robert M., and Zimbler, Linda J. (August, 1991).Profiles of Faculty in Higher Education Institutions, 1988: Contractor Report. Washington; DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement and National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1985).SAS User’s Guide: Basics, Version 5 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, John C., and McLaughlin, Gerald W. (1984).Administrative Service and Research Performance: A Study of Chemistry Department Heads. AIR 1984 Annual Forum Paper.

  • Soldofsky, Robert M. (1984). Age and productivity of university faculties: A case study.Economics of Education Review 3(4): 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, David L. (1992). A multivariate approach to the assessment of quality.Research in Higher Education 33(2): 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, Thorstein (1918, reprinted 1957).The Higher Learning in America. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, B. H. (1980). Standards of departmental excellence: An investigation of the criteria used for judging excellence by selected departmental faculties of a research university.Dissertation Abstracts International 41: 3471A (University Microfilms No. 81-03, 574).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. John’s University, 8000 Utopia Parkway, 11439, Jamaica, NY

    Jeffery E. Olson DAIL

Authors
  1. Jeffery E. Olson DAIL
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olson, J.E. Institutional and technical constraints on faculty gross productivity in American doctoral universities. Res High Educ 35, 549–567 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02497087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02497087

Keywords

Search

Navigation