Adair, R. K. (1991). Using quantitative measures to predict persistence in the natural sciences.College and University 66: 73–79.
Adelman, C. (1991)Women at Thirty-something: Paradoxes of Attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Research and Development.
Astin, A. W., and Astin, H. S. (1993)Undergraduate Science Education: The Impact of Different College Environments on the Educational Pipeline in the Sciences, Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
Benbow, C. P., and Arjmand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Psychology 82(3): 430–441.
Berryman, S. E. (1983).Who Will Do Science? Trends, and their Causes, in Minority and Female Representation Among Holders of Advanced Degrees in Science and Mathematics. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.
Boli, J., Allen, M. L. and Payne, A. (1985). High-ability women and men in under-graduate mathematics and chemistry courses.American Educational Research Journal 22: 605–626.
Bridgeman, B., and Wendler, C. (1989).Prediction of Grades in College Mathematics Courses as a Component of the Placement Validity of SAT-Mathematics Scores (College Board Report 88-9). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Brush, S. G. (1991). Women in science and engineering.American Scientist 79: 404–419.
Chipman, S. F. and Thomas, V. G. (1987). The participation of women and minorities in mathematical, scientific, and technical fields.Review of Research in Higher Education 14: 387–430.
Chipman, S. F., Krantz, D. H., and Silver, R. (1992). Mathematics anxiety and science careers among able college women.Psychological Science 3: 292–295.
College Board (1988a)College-bound Seniors: 1988. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
College Board (1988b).1988 Advanced Placement Program: National Summary Reports. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Constantinople, A., Comelius, R., and Gray, J. (1988). The chilly climate: Fact or artifact?Journal of Higher Education 59(5): 527–550.
DeBoer, G. (1984). A study of gender effects in science and mathematics course-taking behavior among students who graduated from college in the late 1970s.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 21: 95–103.
Dorans, N. J., and Livingston, S. A. (1987). Male-female differences in SAT-verbal ability among students of high SAT-mathematical ability.Journal of Educational Measurement 24(1): 65–71.
Dunteman, G. H., Wisenbaker, J., and Taylor, M. E. (1979)Race and Sex Differences in College Science Program Participation. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning.American Psychologist 10: 1040–1048.
Elliott, R., and Strenta, A. C. (1988). Effects of improving the reliability of the GPA on prediction generally and on comparative predictions for gender and race particularly.Journal of Educational Measurement, 25(4): 333–347.
Goldman, R. D., and Widawski, M. H. (1976). A within-subjects technique for comparing college grading standards: Implications in the, validity of the evaluation of college achievement.Educational and Psychological Measurement 36: 381–390.
Green, K. C. (1989). A profile of undergraduates in the sciences.American Scientist 77: 475–480.
Hall, R. M. and Sandler, B. (1982).The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women? Project on the Status and Education of Women. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
Heller, J. F., Puff, C. R., and Mills, C. J. (1985). Assessment of the chilly college climate for women.Journal of Higher Education 56(4): 446–461.
Hewitt, N. M. and Seymour, E. (1991).Factors Contributing to High Attrition Rates Among Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Undergraduate Majors. Report to The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Boulder, CO: Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado.
Humphreys, S., and Freeland, R. (1992).Retention in Engineering: A Study of Freshman Cohorts. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
Kimball, M. M. (1989) A new perspective on women’s math achievement.Psychological Bulletin 105(2): 198–214.
Krupnick, C. G. (1984) Sex differences in college teachers’ classroom talk., Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Levin, J., and Wyckoff, J. (1988). Effective advising: Identifying students most likely to persist and succeed in engineering.Engineering Education 78: 178–182.
Light, R. J. (1990).Explorations with Students and Faculty About Teaching, Learning, and Student Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Lubinski, D., and Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math-science pipeline.Current Directions in Psychological Science 1(2): 61–66.
Manis, J. D., Thomas, N. G., Sloat, B. F., and Davis, C. (1989).An Analysis of Factors Affecting Choices of Majors in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for continuing Education of Women, University of Michigan.
Matyas, M. L. (1991). Women, men and persons with physical disabilities in science and engineering: Contributing factors and study methodology. In M. L. Matyas and S. M. Malcolm (eds.),Investing in Human Potential: Science and Engineering at the Crossroads (pp. 1–29). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
McCornack, R. L., and McLeod, M. M. (1988). Gender bias in the prediction of college course performance.Journal of Educational Measurement 25: 321–331.
National Science Foundation (1990).Future Scarcities of Scientists and Engineers: Problems and Solutions. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Oakes, J. (1990). Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority studients in science and mathematics.Review of Research in Higher Education 16: 153–222.
Ramist, L., Lewis, C., and McCamley, L. (1992).Student Group Differences in Predicting College Grades. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Sabot, R., and Wakeman-Linn, J. (1991). Grade inflation and course choice.Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 159–170.
Sternglanz, S.H., and Lyberger-Ficek, S. (1977). Sex differences in student teacher interaction in the college classroom.Sex Roles 3: 345–351.
Strenta, A. C. and Elliott, R. (1987). Differential grading standards revisited.Journal of Educational Measurement 24: 281–291.
Stricker, L. J., Rock, D. A., and Burton, N. W. (1991).Sex Differences in SAT Predictions of College Grades (College Board Report No. 91-92). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Tobias, S. (1990).They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
Ware, N. C., and Dill, D. (1986).Persistence in Science Among Mathematically Able Male and Female College Students with Pre-college Plans for a Scientific Major. San Francisco, CA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Ware, N. C., Steckler, N. A., and Leserman, J. (1985). Undergraduate women: Who chooses a science major?Journal of Higher Education 56: 73–84.
White, P. E. (1992).Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering: An Update. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Widnall, S. E. (1988). AAAS presidential lecture: Voices from the pipeline.Science 241: 1740–1745.
Wilder, G. Z., and Powell, K. (1989).Sex Differences in Test Performance A Survey of the Literature (College Board Report No. 89-3). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Willingham, W. W., (1985).Success in College: The Role of Personal Qualities and Academic Ability. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Young, J. W. (1991). Gender bias in predicting college academic performance: A new approach using item response theory.Journal of Educational Measurement 28(1): 37–47.
Zappert, L. T., and Stansbury, K. (1984).In the Pipeline: A Comparative Analysis of Men and Women in Graduate Programs in Science, Engineering, and Medicine at Stanford University. Stanford, CA: Institute for Research on Women and Gender, Stanford University.