Advertisement

Risks and principles: The management of housing with support in the social rented sector in Scotland

  • Delia Lomax
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Social housing plays a key role in the provision of support to disabled people but to what extent can care in the community principles be upheld in the context of the financial constraints in the provision of supported housing? This paper draws on findings from an evaluation of Scottish Home’s care in the community policy, to establish the considerable consensus of opinion on the principles underlying the housing contribution to community care and the increasing concerns of providers on the complexity and instability of the funding mechanisms for supported housing. To illustrate the discrepancy between the word and the deed in housing management practice, evidence is examined from recent studies on the use of housing agreements and tenancy rights in supported accommodation in Scotland. The paper identifies the gap between the expressed aims and intentions of providers and managers towards the occupants of supported housing and housing management practice and contends that financial pressures are a key element in producing this gap. If community care policies are to be successful, appropriate funding mechanisms and housing management practice are crucial.

Keywords

Community Care Disable People Social Housing Housing Association Housing Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, C., D. Clapham, and B. Franklin (1995)The Future of Care in the Community, Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, C., D. Clapham, D. Lomax, M. Munro, and G. Netto (1997)The Nature and Effectiveness of Scottish Homes Contribution, Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, P., H. Bochel, S. Brodhurst, and D. Page (1993)Community Care: The Housing Dimension, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, P., and D. Page (1992)Housing and Community Care: Bricks and Mortar or Foundation for Action? The School of Social and Professional Studies, Hull: Humberside Polytechnic.Google Scholar
  5. Clapham, D., and B. Franklin (1994)The Housing Management Contribution to Community Care, Centre for Housing Research and Urban Studies, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  6. Clapham, D., M. Munro, and H. Kay (1994)A Wider Choice: Revenue Funding Mechanisms for Housing and Community Care, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Clapham, D., and S. Smith (1990) “Housing Policy and Special Needs”Policy and Politics (13), No. 3, pp. 193–205.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, J. (1996)What’s Choice Got To Do With It? London: Values Into Action.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Health (1989)Caring for People: Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Social Security (1998)Supporting People: A New Policy and Funding Framework for Support Services, produced for the Inter-Departmental Review of Funding for Supported Accommodation, Hayes: DSS.Google Scholar
  11. Edgar, W.M., and J. Doherty (1996)Scotspen—Supported Accommodation Database For Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.Google Scholar
  12. Edgar, W.M., and I. Muirhead (1997)Tenancy Rights in Supported Accommodation, Scottish Homes Working Paper, Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.Google Scholar
  13. Kestenbaum, A. (1996)Independent Living: A Review, York: York Publishing Services.Google Scholar
  14. Macfarlane, A., and L. Laurie (1996)Demolishing ‘Special Needs’: Fundamental Principles of Non-Discriminatory Housing, Derby: British Council of Organizations of Disabled People.Google Scholar
  15. Mina-Coull, A. (1997)Housing Agreements in Supported Accommodation in Scotland, Edinburgh: Shelter Scotland.Google Scholar
  16. Murie, M. (1996) “Housing tenure and housing policy”, in Currie, H., and A. Murie (eds.)Housing in Scotland, pp. 135–150. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.Google Scholar
  17. Oliver, M. (1996)Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Oliver, M., and C. Barnes (1998)Disabled People and Social Policy: From Exclusion to Inclusion, London: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Scottish Federation of Housing Associations (1997)Housing Associations and Community Care: Crisis Point, Summary of Membership Survey, Edinburgh: SFHA.Google Scholar
  20. Scottish Federation of Housing Associations (1996)Submission to the Scottish Affairs Inquiry Into The Implementation of Community Care, Edinburgh: SFHA.Google Scholar
  21. Scottish Homes (1993) IPN 93/18.Google Scholar
  22. Scottish Homes (1994)Internal Procedure Note: Special Needs Allowance Package, IPN 94/10.Google Scholar
  23. Scottish Homes (1997)Revised SNAP Procedures—Draft for Consultation, Edinburgh: Scottish Homes.Google Scholar
  24. Scottish Office (1991)Community Care Planning, SW1/1991, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  25. Scottish Office (1995)Good Practice Note 5: Tenancy Management, Edinburgh: Good Practice in Housing Management Series.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, S.J., and S. Mallinson (1997) “Housing for health in a post-welfare state”,Housing Studies (12), no. 2, April, pp. 173–200.Google Scholar
  27. Wertheimer, A. (1989)Housing: The Foundation of Community Care, London: National Federation of Housing Associations/MIND.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Delft University Press 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Delia Lomax
    • 1
  1. 1.the School of Planning and Housing at Edinburgh College of Art/Heriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations