Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of private finance on the provision of social housing in England

  • Published:
Netherlands journal of housing and the built environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Button, F. (1993),Best Practice for Better Borrowing: A case study of 10 registered housing associations reviewing their experiences in borrowing from private lenders. Report prepared for National Federation of Housing Associations, Department of Environment & Housing Corporation, London: NFHA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corporation Circular (1989), “Financial criteria for privately, mixed and publicly funded programmes”, HC 74/89 November, London: Housing Corporation.

  • Corporation Circular (1991a), “Financial criteria for allocations; privately, mixed and publicly funded programmes”, HC 30/91 October, London: Housing Corporation.

  • Corporation Circular (1991b), “Total cost indicators and grant rates for housing associations schemes for rent in 1992–93”, HC 33/91 October, London: Housing Corporation.

  • Corporation News (1992), “Cash programmes replace tariff from April”, 16 March London: Housing Corporation.

  • Corporation News Supplement (1991), “TCI Review: A difficult birth”, 6 October, London: Housing Corporation.

  • Financial Times (1993), “Sharp rise in housing association rents”, August 23 p. 5.

  • Gibb, K. and M. Munro (1991),Housing Finance in the UK, London: Macmillan, Chapters 5 and 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. (1991),Unravelling Housing Finance, Oxford: Clarendon Press, Chapters 4, 5, 8, and 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housing Associations Weekly (1991a), “Private lenders dictate lending policy”, September 27 p. 8.

  • Housing Associations Weekly (1991b), “Letters: rent levels and finance”, September 27, p. 11.

  • Housing Associations Weekly (1991c), “High rents warning on mixed funding”, October 4, p. 3.

  • Housing Associations Weekly (1991d), “Proposals for HA privatisation get an airing”, October 4, p. 4.

  • Housing Associations Weekly (1993), “Financially sound HAs to get funding”, July 23, p. 2.

  • Housing Corporation (1991),Financial viability returns. London: Housing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryke, M.D. and C.M.E. Whitehead (1991),An overview of recent change in the provision of private finance for social housing. Discussion Paper 28 Property Research Unit, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.

  • Pryke, M.D. and C.M.E. Whitehead (1993a), “The provision of private finance for social housing: an outline of recent developments in funding existing housing associations in England”,Housing Studies (8), No. 4, pp. 274–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryke, M.D. and C.M.E. Whitehead (1993b),Private finance for social housing. Housing Research Findings 73, (JRF. York).

  • Pryke, M.D. and C.M.E. Whitehead (1994), “Private finance and the risks of social housing provision”, Discussion Paper 38, Property Research Unit, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.

  • Randolph, B. (1993), “The re-privatization of housing associations” in Malpass, P., and R. Means (eds.),Implementing Housing Policy, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Housing (1992), “Revolution in social housing will be forced by 55% HAG rate” December, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Housing (1993), “Special report: HA treasury management”, pp. 4–10.

  • Whitehead, C.M.E. (1993a), “Private finance for housing associations”, in MacLennann D. and K. Gibb (eds.),Housing Finance and Subsidies in Britain, Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C.M.E. (1993b), “Developments in the provision of housing finance in the UK”, in Turner B. and C.M.E. Whitehead (eds.),Housing Finance in the 1990s, Research Report SB 53 (The National Swedish Institute for Building Research, Gävle) pp. 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C.M.E. (1993c), “Privatizing housing: An assessment of UK experience”,Housing Policy Debate (4), No. 1, pp. 101–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Michael Pryke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine Whitehead
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper is one output of a research project entitled ‘The management of housing risk’ funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. The authors are grateful to the Foundation for their continuing support. They would also like to thank those people who kindly took part in the research. The usual disclaimers apply. An earlier version of this paper was prepared for ‘Housing policy in Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s: transformation in the East, transference from the West’, ENHR Conference in Budapest, Hungary, 7–10 September 1993, organized by Metropolitan Research Institute and Institute for Sociology, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pryke, M., Whitehead, C. The influence of private finance on the provision of social housing in England. Neth J of Housing and the Built Environment 9, 357–379 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496525

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496525

Keywords

Search

Navigation