Skip to main content
Log in

Relative cost of owner-occupation and renting: A study of six Dutch neighborhoods

  • Published:
Netherlands journal of housing and the built environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Who pays less for housing: the homeowner or the renter? It is widely accepted that the answer is related to the period in time and the income of the households involved. This contribution is concerned with the added effect of place (neighborhood). We calculated the user cost over the period 1978 to 1993 for six different neighborhoods with a stock similar of owner-occupied and rented dwellings. Six neighborhoods in Randstad Holland were selected, each representing a given building period. The data were derived from a questionnaire held in 1993 among renters and homeowners in these neighborhoods. National figures elucidate the differences between income groups and over time. Our data show that the influence of place is not negligible. The housing costs of homeowners and renters alike differ from one neighborhood to another. The influence of place may be attributed to several factors: the building period and the subsidy rules in force at that time; the development of the value of the owner-occupied dwellings; the rent policy; and the land policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boelhouwer, P.J., J.B.S. Conijn, and P. de Vries (1995),De prijsontwikkeling van koopwoningen, Delft: Delft University Press 95–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conijn, J.B.S., P.F.H. van Deudekom, and I.L. Ooms (1987)De verdeling van de individuele woonuitgaven 1982–1994; de koopsector, Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conijn, J.B.S. (1995)Enkele financieel-economische grondslagen van de volkshuisvesting, Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment (1990)Housing and Construction Statistics 1979–1989, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D.B. (1980) “Taxes, inflation, speculation and the cost of homeownership”,AREUEA Journal (8), pp. 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donk P. van de, and B. Mikulic (1994), “Is bruto huurwaarde huur?”,Supplement bij de sociaal-economische maandstatistiek, No. 5, pp. 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, T.W. (1986) “Using the user cost”,Journal of Economics and Business (38), No. 4, Dec., pp. 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elseviers Belasting-Almanak 1980–1993, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Elsinga, M.G. (1995)Een eigen huis voor een smalle beurs: Het ideaal voor bewoner en overheid?, Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follain, J.R., and D.C. Ling (1988) “Another look at tenure choice, inflation, and taxes”,AREUEA Journal (16), No. 3, pp. 207–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulpen, H. van (1983)Woonlasten- en inkomstenbegrippen in onderzoek en statistiek, Delft: Delft University Press, Dec. [working paper 5 from the research project Woonlasten en woonlastenbeleid (Housing Expenses and Policy)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Haffner, M.E.A. (1992)Eigen woning in de EG: fiscale en overige instrumenten, Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haffner, M.E.A. (1994) “Definition of housing expenses and costs”, in Hrdlicka, A., and N. Pichler-Milanovich (eds.),Proceedings from the first meeting and seminar of the ENHR Young Housing Researchers, London 20–22 April 1994, pp. 51–58, Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. (1991)Unravelling Housing Finance: Subsidies, Benefits, and Taxation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linneman, P., and R. Voith (1991) “Housing price functions and ownership capitalization rates”,Journal of Urban Economics (30), no. 1, pp. 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megbolugbe, I.F., and P.D. Linneman (1993) “Home ownership”,Urban Studies (30), nos. 4/5, pp. 659–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkveld, A. (1993)Een internationale vergelijking van woonuitgaven; een microanalyse, Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, D. (1992) “Housing and the wider economy in the short and long run”,National Institute Economic Review, Feb., pp. 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie VROM (1992)Profielschets van de ontvangers van individuele huursubsidie, Den Haag: VROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie VROM (1994)Volkshuisvesting in cijfers 1993, Den Haag: VROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, H.S., and K.T. Rosen (1980) “Federal taxes and homeownership: Evidence from time series”,Journal of Political Economy (11), pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, C. (1984) “A model of rental and owner-occupied housing”,Journal of Urban Economics (16), no. 3, pp. 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Jichung, and F. Gerard Adams (1994) “The user cost estimation of owneroccupied housing”,Journal of Policy Modeling (16), no. 3, pp. 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elsinga, M. Relative cost of owner-occupation and renting: A study of six Dutch neighborhoods. Neth J of Housing and the Built Environment 11, 131–150 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496483

Keywords

Navigation