Acta Mechanica Sinica

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 76–81 | Cite as

Coupling of assumed stress finite element and boundary element methods with stress-traction equilibrium

  • Guzelbey Ibrahim H.
  • Kanber Bahattin
  • Akpolat Abdullah
Article

Abstract

In this study, the stress based finite element method is coupled with the boundary element method in two different ways. In the first one, the ordinary distribution matrix is used for coupling. In the second one, the stress traction equilibrium is used at the interface line of both regions as a new coupling process. This new coupling procedure is presented without a distribution matrix. Several case studies are solved for the validation of the developed coupling procedure. The results of case studies are compared with the distribution matrix coupling, displacement based finite element method, assumed stress finite element method, boundary element method, ANSYS and analytical results whenever possible. It is shown that the coupling of the stress traction equilibrium with assumed stress finite elements gives as accurate results as those by the distribution matrix coupling.

Key Words

coupling assumed stress FEM BEM stress-traction equilibrium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zienkiewicz OC, Kelly DW, Bettess P. The coupling of the finite element method and boundary solution procedures.Int J Numer Meth Engng, 1977, 11: 355–375MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kelly DW, Mustoe GGW, Zienkiewicz OC. Coupling Boundary Element Methods with Other Numerical Methods, Developments in Boundary Element Methods. Vol-1, Chap 10, London: Applied Science Publishers, 1979Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Felippa CA. Interfacing finite element and boundary element discretization.Appl Math Modelling, 1981, 5: 383–386MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beer G, Meek JL. The coupling of the boundary and finite element methods for infinite domain problems in elastoplasticity. In: Brebbia CA ed. Proc 3rd Inter Sem Boundary Element Methods, Irvine, Berlin: Springer, 1981. 575–591Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beer G. Finite element, boundary element and coupled analysis of unbounded problems in elastostatics.Int J Numer Meth Engng, 1983, 19: 567–580MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pian THH. Derivation of element stiffness matrices by assumed stress distributions.AIAA, 1964, 2: 1333–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tong P. New displacement hybrid finite element models for solid continua.Int J Numer Meth Engng, 1970, 2: 73–83MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pian THH, Sumihara K. Rational approach for assumed stress elements.Int J Numer Meth Engng, 1984, 20: 1685–1695MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pian THH, Tong P. Relations between incompatible displacement model and hybrid stress model.Int J Numer Meth Engng, 1986, 22: 173–181MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pian THH, Wu CC. A rational approach for choosing stress terms for hybrid finite element formulations.Int J Numer Meth Engng, 1988, 26: 2331–2343MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guzelbey IH. Finite and boundary element analysis of elasto-plastic finite strain contact problems. [Ph D Dissertation]. Cranfield Institute of Technology, UK, 1992Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanber B. A new procedure for finite and boundary element methods. [Ph D Dissertation]. University of Gaziantep, Turkey, 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guzelbey Ibrahim H.
    • 1
  • Kanber Bahattin
    • 1
  • Akpolat Abdullah
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of GaziantepGaziantepPurkey

Personalised recommendations