Summary
Separations of eleven quinolone antibiotics were optimised on three different HPLC stationary phases. The performance of each was evaluated and compared. Both acidic and amphoteric quinolone derivatives were included in the study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Carlucci, G.J. Chromatog. A 1998,812, 343–367.
Brown, S.A.J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 1996,19, 1–14.
Munns, R.K.; Turnipseed, S.B.; Pfenning, A.P.; Roybal, J.E.; Holland, D.C.; Long, A.R.; Plakas, S.M.J. AOAC Int. 1995,78, (2), 343–352.
Rose, M.D.; Bygrave, J.; Stubbings, G.W.F.Analyst 1998,123, 2789–2796.
Cohen, E.; Maxwell, R.J.; Donoghue, D.J.J. Chromatog. B 1999,724, 137–145.
Horie, M.; Saito, K.; Nose, N.; Nakazawa, H.J. Food Hygenic Society Japan,1995,36, (1), 62–67.
Barbosa, J.; Berges, R.; Sanz-Nebot, V.J. Chromatog. A 1998,823, 411–422.
Barbosa, J.; Berges, R.; Toro, I.; Sanz-Nebot, V.Talanta 1997,44, 1271–1283.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, G., Westwood, S. & Houghton, R. A generic approach for the HPLC separation of quinolone antibiotics. Chromatographia 55 (Suppl 1), S127–S131 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493368
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493368