, Volume 57, Issue 5–6, pp 329–337 | Cite as

Theoretical study of the effect of frit quality on chromatography using computational fluid dynamics

  • Y. X. Wu
  • C. B. Ching
Originals Column Liquid Chromatography


Frits at both ends of a chromatographic column, especially for a preparative column, have significant influence on the flow distribution within the column and thus the column efficiency. However, frits have received little attention from chromatographers in the past. Here a theoretical study was conducted with the aid of CFD software FLUENT to investigate the effect of frits on the performance of homogeneous and heterogeneous chromatographic columns. A dimensionless number,FQ, was applied to characterize frit quality. This study visualized how frit quality affects the flow distribution and the concentration band, the shape of eluted pulse at the colum exit and column efficiency. Simulation results show that the development length of the flow distribution is related toFQ but has nothing to do with the packing heterogeneity. The curvature of the concentration band in a column depends onFQ and packing quality. This study shows column efficiency can be improved significantly by increasingFQ and/or frit permeability.

Key Words

Column liquid chromatography End frits Column efficiency Computational fluid dynamics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Ganetsos, G.; Barker, P.E.Preparative and Production Scale Chromatography, Chapter 2, Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York,1992.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Lode, F.G.; Rosenfeld, A.; Yuan, Q.S.; Root, T.W.; Lightfoot, E.N.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,796, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Broyles, B.S.; Shalliker, R.A.; Guiochon, G.J. Chromatogr. A 1999,855, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Shalliker, R.A.; Broyles, B.S.; Guiochon, G.Anal. Chem. 2000,72, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Broyles, B.S.; Shalliker, R.A.; Guiochon, G.J. Chromatogr. A 2001,917, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lisso, M.; Wozny, G.; Arlt, W.; Beste, Y.A.Chemie Ingenieur Technik 2000,494, 72–78.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Sarker, M.; Katti, A.M.; Guiochon, G.J. Chromatogr. A 1996,719, 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Guiochon, G.; Farkas, T.; Hong, G.-S.; Koh, J.-H.; Sarker, M.; Stanley, B.J.; Yun, T.J. Chromatogr. A 1997,762, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Yun, T.; Guichon, G.J. Chromatogr. A 1997,760, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Knox, J.H.; Laird, G.R.; Raven, P.A.J. Chromatogr. 1976,122, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Eon, C.H.J. Chromatogr. 1978,149, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Farkas, T.; Chambers, J.Q.; Guiochon, G.J. Chromatogr. A 1994,679, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Fernandez, E.J.; Grotegut, C.A.; Braun, G.W.; Kirshner, K.J.; Staudaher, J.R.; Dickson, M.L.; Fernandez, V.L.Phys. Fluids 1995,7, 468–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Colenbrander, G.W.Appl. Sci. Res 1991,48, 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Harris, C.K.; Roekaerts, D.; Rosendal, F.J.J.; Buitendijk, F.G.J.; Daskopoulos, Ph.; Vreenegoor, A.J.N.; Wang, H.Chem. Eng. Sci. 1996,51, 1569–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Kuipers, J.A.M.; van Swaaij, W.P.M.Rev. Chem. Eng. 1997,13, 1–118.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Farkas, T.; Sepaniak, M.J.; Guiochon, G.J. Chromagr. A 1996,740, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Sahimi, M.Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock Weinheim: VCH.1995.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    User's Guide of FLUENT 4.5, FLUENT Inc.1992.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ruthven, D.M.Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption processes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York,1984.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Ching, C.B.; Wu, Y.X.; Lisso, M.; Wozny, G.; Laiblin, T.; Arlt, W.J. Chromatogr. A 2002,945, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. X. Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. B. Ching
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical & Environmental EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.MedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations