Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 54, Issue 3–4, pp 155–162 | Cite as

Capillary electrochromatography (CEC) in columns with different inner diameters

  • B. Scherer
  • F. Steiner
Originals

Summary

Capillaries with different inner diameters (50–250 μm) were packed with the same stationary phase and their electrochromatographic performance was studied. Special focus was put on the currents measured in these capillaries and the necessity of controlling temperature, especially in capillaries of larger inner diameter. With a commercial instrument no loss in plate numbers was observed for a capillary with an I.D. of 180 μm and the corresponding Ohm plot was linear.

A test mixture consisting of polar (weakly basic and acidic) and non-polar compounds was separated on packed capillaries with a range of inner diameters. No mass overloading could be observed if sample concentrations up to 5000 ppm were injected. On the other hand, when the injected sample volume exceeds 1% of the packed bed volume a decrease of the separation efficiency occurred.

When the capillary I.D. was changed from 50 μm to 180 μm, peak heights and peak areas increased 5 to 6-fold. As a consequence the detection limits of the 180 μm I.D. capillary were 5.6–7.5 times lower than those obtained in a 50 μm I.D. capillary.

Key Words

Capillary electrochromatography Packed columns with various I.D. Joule heating Detection sensitivity Column loadability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Pretorius, V.; Hopkins, B.J.; Schieke, J.D.J. Chromatogr. 1974,99, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Knox, J.H.Chromatographia 1988,26, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Choudhary, G.; Horváth, Cs.J. Chromatogr. A 1997,781, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Wen, E.; Asiaie, R.; Horváth, Cs.J. Chromatogr. A 1999,855, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Knox, J.H.; Grant, I.H.Chromatographia 1991,32, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Knox, J.H.; McCormack, K.A.Chromatographia 1994,38, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Yamamoto, H.; Baumann, J.; Erni, F.J. Chromatogr. 1992,593, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Pusecker, K.; Schewitz, J.; Gfrörer, P.; Tseng, L.-H.; Albert, K.; Bayer, E.Anal. Chem. 1998,70, 3280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Yan, C.; Schaufelberger, D.; Erni, F.J. Chromatography A 1994,670, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Rebscher, H.; Pyell, U.Chromatographia 1996,42, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Chen, J.-R.; Zare, R.N.; Peters, E.C.; Svec, F.; Frechet, J.J.Anal. Chem. 2001,73, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Bruin, G.J.M.; Stegeman, G.; van Asten, A.C.; Xu, X.; Kraak, J.C.; Poppe, H.J. Chromatogr. 1991,559, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kok, W.Chromatographia 2000,51 (Supplement Vol.), 52.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Boughtflower, R.J.; Underwood, T.; Patterson, C.J.Chromatographia 1995;40, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Engelhardt, H.; Hafner, F.-T.Chromatographia 2000,52, 769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    van den Bosch, S.E.; Heemstra, S.; Kraak, J.C.; Poppe, H.J. Chromatogr. A 1996,755, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Pyell, U.; Rebscher, H.; Banholczer, A.J. Chromatogr. A 1997,779, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Scherer
    • 1
  • F. Steiner
    • 1
  1. 1.Instrumental/Environmental AnalysisUniversity of the SaarlandSaarbruckenGermany

Personalised recommendations