, Volume 54, Issue 9–10, pp 659–663 | Cite as

Simultaneous determination of benzene and total aromatic fraction of gasoline by HPLC-DAD

  • L. Zoccolillo
  • M. Alessandrelli
  • M. Felli
Short Communication Column Liquid Chromatography


A new method is described for the simultaneous determination of benzene and the total aromatic fraction in gasoline by HPLC coupled with a diode array detector (DAD). The detection wavelength of 205 nm was selected on the basis of the UV spectra of benzene, its homologues and interfering compounds, obtained by diode array detector. The use of this wavelength plays an important role in minimizing positive interference from trace compounds, which have a strong absorbance at 254 nm, the typical wavelength at which aromatics are detected.

To develop the method a standard solution of seven aromatics compounds was used (benzene, toluene, ortho-, meta- and para-xylenes, ethyl-benzene and 1,3,5-trimethyl-benzene), each at 5% v/v in hexane to simulate the behavior of a gasoline with 35% v/v of total aromatics.

The sensitivity of this method to benzene is in the range of 2×10−3% v/v. This method was also applied to a gasoline with a known percentage of benzene and total aromatics and proved quite accurate.

Key Words

Column liquid chromatography Gasoline Benzene Total aromatic fraction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Portolani, A.; Ruffin, D.Enciclopedia della Chimica 1978,8, 419, 438, 443, 444.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Periago, J.F.; Zambudio, A.; Prado, C.J. of Chomatography 1997,778, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    IARC,Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans 1982,29, 93.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    ACGIH,TLVs: Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices for 1995–1996.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Deutsche Forrschungsgemeinschaft. Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area,Maximum Concentrations and Biological Tolerance Values at the Workplace 1994, Report n.30.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Wallace, J.,Environ. Health Persp. 1996,104, supplement 6.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Pedersen, P.S.; Ingwersen, J.; Nielsen, T.; Larsen, E.Environ. Sci. Technol.,1980,14, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Candeli, A.; Morozzi, G.; Paolacci, A.; Zoccolillo, L.Atmos. Environ. 1975,9, 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Gilli, G.; Scursatore, E.; Bono, R.Environ. Health Persp. 1996,104, Supplement 6.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Schueltzle, D.; Siegl, W.O.; Jensen, T.E.; Dearth, M.A.; Kaiser, E.W.; Gorse, R.; Kreucher, W.; Kulik E.Environ. Health Persp. 1994,102, Supplement 4, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Menkes, D.B.; Fawcett, J.P.Environ. Health Persp. 1997,105(3), 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Di Corcia, A.; Samperi, R.; Capponi, G.J. of Chomatography 1978,160, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kuzyaeva, V.V.; Kulikov; V.I.; Markevich, S.V.J. of Anal. Chem. URSS 1982, 111–117.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    ASTMD 3606,1982, 379.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Zoccolillo, L.; Cartoni, G.P.; Rizzo, A.P.; Ronchetti, M.Chromatographia 1987,23 (11), 825–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Matsushita, S.; Tada, Y.; Ikushige, T.J. of Chomatography,1981,208, 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Helge Stay-Norvegian Institute for Air ResearchJ. of Chomatography,1982,248, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    ASTM D 4053,1981, 625.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Steinmetzer, H.GIT Fachz Lab. 1980,24, 95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Zoccolillo
    • 1
  • M. Alessandrelli
    • 1
  • M. Felli
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di ChimicaUniversità degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations