Skip to main content
Log in

The problem with the offord equation: Hydration—a statistical investigation of the effect of charge size and confirmation of the effect of charge distribution upon electrophoretic mobilities

  • Originals
  • Electrochromatography/Electrophoresis
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A previous study has demonstrated that the average electrophoretic behaviour (mobilities, μep of eighteen peptides were well described by the inverse square law: μep ∝ l/r 2 (wherer is the hydrodynamic radius). However, examination of the dependence of μep, upon the magnitude of the charge and its distribution led to the conclusion that deviations from the averaged behaviour arose from a charge-induced volumetric effect.

In the current work, we have sought to determine the generality of the above findings via a statistical examination of μep for an independent and larger set of peptides. Both objective testing by the Offord eq and statistical analysis of the variation of the log μep/Z function reveals a strong residual dependence upon the magnitude of the overall charge. Furthermore, it was found that an even finer distinction exists between peptides of differing charge distribution types. Terminal charges affect the peptide mobilities differently to those charges located within the amino acid sequence and isolated charges affect mobility differently to the same number of adjacent charges. The empirical addition of hydration to each charge type produces a linear log plot of the Offord equation (R 2=0.991) that has a gradient (0.64) very close to that theoretically expected (0.67). Hence hydration removes the observed deviations from the averaged electrophoretic behaviour that is associated with highly charged analytes and corrects the Offord equation. It is postulated that higher charge densities lead to more open structures, greater solvation and thus larger electromigrating molecular ions with smaller mobilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Compton, B.J.; O'Grady, E.A.Anal. Chem. 1991,63, 2597–2602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rowe, R.C.; Wren, S.A.C.; McKillop, A.G.Electrophoresis 1994,15, 635–639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cross, R.F.; Cao, J.J. Chromatogr. A 1997,786, 171–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Janini, G.M.; Metral, C.J.; Issaq, H.J.; Muschik, G.M.J. Chromatogr. A 1999,848, 417–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cross, R.F.; Wong, M.G.Chromatographia 2001,53, 431–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Offord, R.E.Nature (London) 1966,211, 591–593.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Janini, G.M.; Metral, C.J.; Issaq, H.J.; Muschik, G.M.24 th Interntl. Sym. High Perfor. Liq. Phase Sep. & Rel. Tech. Seattle, June2000.

  8. Grossman, P.D.; Colburn, J.C.; Lauer, H.H.Anal. Biochem. 1989,179, 28–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Weisberg, S.Applied Linear Regression, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York,1985, Chps 5, 6 and 7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rickard, C.E.; Strohl, M.M.; Nielsen, R.G.Anal. Biochem. 1991,197, 197–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cross, R.F.; Cao, J.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,809, 159–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cross, R.F.; Cao, J.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,818, 217–229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watanabe, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Takase, H.; Kikuchi, O.J. Molec. Struct. (Theochem.) 1997,397, 113–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cross, R.F., Garnham, N.F. The problem with the offord equation: Hydration—a statistical investigation of the effect of charge size and confirmation of the effect of charge distribution upon electrophoretic mobilities. Chromatographia 54, 639–646 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492192

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492192

Key Words

Navigation