Chromatographia

, Volume 57, Issue 9–10, pp 605–610 | Cite as

Micellar liquid chromatography of polyaromatic hydrocarbons using anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants: Armstrong model, LSER interpretation

  • F. Mutelet
  • M. Rogalski
  • M. H. Guermouche
Originals Column Liquid Chromatography

Summary

The capacity factorsk of 28 polycromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were determined by micellarliquid chromatography (CLM) in several mobiles phases containing anionic (SDS), cationic (CTAB), or non-ionic(Brij 35) surfactants. The micelle-water binding constantsK MW were calculated via the Armstrong theory. Linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) were used to correlatek andK MW with the PAHs solvatochromic descriptors. LSER correlation was convenient fork. were The most important factors appeared to be the size and basicity of the PAHs. In the retention of the PAHs, their volume interacted positively and their basicity negatively. LSER correlation ofK MW was relatively poor due to the difficult and complex transfer PAHs from water to the micelles. The volume and basicity strongly influenced theK MW, depending on the surfactant. With SDS or Brij 35, the PAH size increasedK MW whereas its basicity decreasedK MW. The opposite was observed with CTAB.

Key Words

Column liquid chromatography Micellar Liquid Chromatography Armstrong Model Linear Solvation Energy Relationship Polycromatic Hydrocarbons 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Armstrong, D.W.; Nome, F.Anal. Chem. 1981,53, 1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Khaledi, M.G.Biochromatogr. 1988,3, 20.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Dorsey, J.G.Biochromatogr. 1987,2, 13.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Deluccia, F.J.; Arunyanart, M.; Cline-Love, L. J.Anal. Chem. 1985,57, 1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Arunyanat, M.; Cline Love, L.J.Anal. Chem. 1985,57, 2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Habel, D.; Guermouche, S.; Guermouche, M.H.Analyst 1993,118, 1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Berry, J.P.; Weber, S.G.J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1987,25, 307.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Habel, D.; Guermouche, S.; Guermouche, M. H.Biomed. Chromatogr. 1997,11, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hu, W.; Takeuchi, T.; Haraguchi, H.Chromatographia 1992,33, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hu, W.; Haraguchi, H.Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1993,66, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Dorsey, J.G.; De Echegaray, M.T.; Landy, J.S.Anal. Chem. 1983,55, 924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Lavine, B.K.; Hendayana, S.J. Liq. Chrom. & Rel. Technol. 1996,19, 101.Google Scholar
  13. [12]
    Yarmchuk, P.; Weinberger, R.; Hirsch, R.F.; Cline Love, L.J.Anal. Chem. 1982,54, 2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [13]
    Dorsey, J.G.; De Echegaray, M.T.; Landy, J.S.Anal. Chem. 1983,85 924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [14]
    Lopez-Lopez, D.; Rubio-Barroso, S.; M. Polo-Diez, L.J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1995,18, 2397.Google Scholar
  16. [15]
    Rodriguez Delgado, M.A.; Sanchez, M. J.; Gonzalez, V.; Garcia Montelongo, F.J. Chromatogr. A 1991,697, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [16]
    Rodriguez Delgado, M.A.; Sanchez, M.J.; Gonzalez, V.; Garcia Montelongo, F.J. Liq. Chrom. & rel. technol. 1996,19, 187.Google Scholar
  18. [17]
    Taft, R.W.; Abboud, J.M.; Kamlet, M.J.; Abraham, M.H.J. Solut. Chem. 1985,14, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [18]
    Kamlet, M.J.; Doherty, R.M.; Abraham, M.H.; Marcus, Y.; Taft, R.W.J. Phys. Chem. 1988,92, 18, 5244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [19]
    Taft, R.W.; Abraham, M.H.; Famini, G.R.; Doherty, R.M.; Abboud, J.M.; Kamlet M.J.J. Pharm. Sci. 1985,74, 807.Google Scholar
  21. [20]
    Kamlet, M.J.; Abraham, M.H.; Carr, P.W.; Doherty, R.M.; Taft, R.W.J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. II1988, 2087.Google Scholar
  22. [21]
    Carr, P.W.Microchem. J. 1993,48, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [22]
    Helburn, R.S.; Rutan, S.C.; Pampano, J.; Mitchem, D.; Patterson, W.T.Anal. Chem. 1994,66, 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [23]
    Carr, P.W.; Doherty, R.M.; Kamlet, R.W.; Taft, R.W.; Melander, W.; Horväth, C.Anal. Chem. 1986,58, 2674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [24]
    Yang, S.; Khaledi, M.G.Anal. Chem. 1995,67, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [25]
    Yang, S.; Khaledi, M.G.J. Chromatogr. A 1995,692, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [26]
    Garcia, M.A., Vitha, M.F.; Marina, M.I.J. Liq. Chrom. & rel. technol. 2000,23, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [27]
    Tan, L.C.; Carr, P.W.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,799 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Mutelet
    • 2
  • M. Rogalski
    • 2
  • M. H. Guermouche
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculté de ChimieUSTHBAlgerAlgérie
  2. 2.LTAC, UFR Sciences, Ile du SaulcyUniversité de MetzMetzFrance

Personalised recommendations