Advertisement

Chromatographia

, Volume 53, Supplement 1, pp S434–S437 | Cite as

Effect of template size on the selectivity of molecularly imprinted polymers for phenylurea herbicides

  • A. Martín-Esteban
  • E. Turiel
  • D. Stevenson
Originals Solid-Phase Extraction

Summary

Four different methacrylic acid-based, molecularly imprinted, polymers, using fenuron or isoproturon as template and acetonitrile or toluene as porogen, were prepared in order to evaluate the template size effect on the selectivity and the porogen effect on the affinity of recognition in molecular imprinting solid-phase extraction. The results of different tests applied to both polymers have shown that fenuron-polymers were highly selective whereas isoproturon-polymers were able to recognise several structurally related compounds (metoxuron, fenuron, metobromuron, chlortoluron, linuron and chlorbromuron). On the other hand, the polymers prepared using toluene as porogen showed a higher affinity for the tested compounds than those prepared in acetonitrile. Accordingly, the isoproturon-imprinted polymer prepared in toluene has been evaluated as a new sorbent in solid-phase extraction procedures for the trace-enrichment and clean-up of phenyureas in ground water and soil samples.

Key Words

Solid-phase extraction Molecular imprinting Template size Environmental samples Phenylurea herbicides 

References

  1. [1]
    Rashid, B.A.; Aherne, G.W.; Katmeh, M.F.; Kawasowski, P.; Stevenson, D.J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 797, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Martin-Esteban, A.; Kwasowski, P.; Stevenson, D.Chromatographia 1997, 45, 364.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Martín-Esteban, A.; Fernández, P.; Cámara, C.Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem. 1997, 357, 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Pichon, V.; Bouzige, M.; Miège, C.; Hennion, M.-C.Trends. Anal. Chem. 1999, 18, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Mayes, A.G.; Mosbach, K.Trends Anal. Chem. 1997, 16, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Andersson, L.I.; Paprica, A.; Arvidson, T.Chromatographia 1997, 46, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Rashid, B.A.; Briggs, R.J.; Hay, J.N.; Stevenson, D.Anal. Comm. 1997, 34, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Muldoon, M.T.; Stanker, L.H.Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Zander, A.; Findlay, P.; Renner, T.; Sellergren, B.; Swietlow, A.Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Ferrer, I.; Lanza, F.; Tolokan, A.; Horvath, V.; Sellergren, B.; Horvai, G.; Barceló, D.Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 3934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Sellergren, B.; Lepistö, M.; Mosbach, K.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Sellergren, B.Trends Anal. Chem. 1999, 18, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Martín-Esteban
    • 1
  • E. Turiel
    • 2
  • D. Stevenson
    • 3
  1. 1.Departmento de Química, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad Europea-CEESMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departmento de Química Analítica, Facultad de Ciencias QuímicasUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.Analytical Unit, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations