Oral Radiology

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 1–7 | Cite as

A new device for standardized intraoral projection: An observation of radiographic changes after root planing

  • Ryuji Sakagami
  • Hiroshi Kato
Original Article

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the geometric and densitometric reproducibility of a newly developed standardized X-ray system and to examine the radiographic changes after scaling/root planing as shown by this device. The system was comprised of three parts: an acrylic bite piece for the individual patient, an aluminum wedge-equipped holder, and a holder-connecting device. The experiment was performed at 32 sites of premolar and molar areas in 19 patients. Radiographs were retaken 6 weeks after scaling/root planing and the reproducibility and radiographic changes were examined. The vertical and horizontal geometric reproducibility of the system at 32 sites in 19 patients were 1.0% and 1.8%, respectively. Of 351 scaled sites, 39 (11.1%) exhibited bone regeneration, and 6 (1.7%) exhibited bone loss. These results indicate that the newly developed system has high accuracy and clinical usefulness. Early bone remodeling can be observed radiographically after 6 weeks with our standardized X-ray system.

Key Words

Standardized X-ray system Geometric reproducibility Scaling/Root planing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    Lang, N. and Hill, R.: Radiographs in periodontics.J. Clin. Periodontol. 4: 16–28, 1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2).
    Tibbetts, J., Allen, K. and Hausmann, E.: Effect of X-ray angulation on radiographic periodontal ligament space width.J. Periodontol. 63: 114–117, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3).
    Carpio, L., Hausmann, E., Dunford, R., Allen, K. and Chritersson, L.: Evaluation of a simple modified radiographic alignment system for routine use.J. Periodontol. 65: 62–67, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4).
    Grodah, I. K., Grodah, I. H. and Webber, R.: Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions.J. Clin. Periodontol. 11: 411–420, 1983Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    Jeffcoat, M., Reddy, M., Webber, R., Williams, R. and Ruttimann, U.: Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography.J. Periodontal Res. 22: 369–402, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6).
    Janssen, P., van Palenstein Helderman, W. and van Aken, J.: The effect of in-vivo-occurring measurement differences in the reproducibility of radiographs on the use of the subtraction technique.J. Clin. Periodontol. 16: 53–58, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7).
    Duckworth, J., Judy, P., Goodson, J. and Socransky, S.: A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs.J. Periodontol. 54: 435–440, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    Schmidt, E., Webber, R., Ruttimann, U. and Loeshe, W.: Effect of periodontal therapy on alveolar bone as measured by subtraction radiography.J. Periodontol. 59: 633–638, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    Rudolph, D. and White, S.: Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography.Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 65: 767–772, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10).
    Zappa, U., Graf, H. and van Aken, J.: In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an X-ray beam manipulator.J. Periodontol. 62: 674–683, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11).
    Ruttimann, U., Webber, R. and Schmidt, E.: A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography.J. Periodontal Res. 21: 486–495, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12).
    Hausmann, E., Allen, K., Christersson, L. and Genco, R.: Effect of X-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic alveolar crest level measurement.J. Periodontal Res. 24: 8–19, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13).
    Hildebolt, C. and Vannier, M.: Automated classification of periodontal disease using bitewing radiographs.J. Periodontol. 59: 87–94, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14).
    Hausmann, E., Allen, K., Dunford, R. and Christersson, L.: A reliable computerized method to determine the level of the radiographic alveolar crest.J. Periodontal Res. 24: 368–369, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15).
    Greenstein, G., Polson, A., Iker, H. and Meitner, S.: Associations between crestal lamina dura and periodontal status.J. Periodontol. 52: 362–366, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16).
    Rosling, B., Hollender, L., Nyman, S. and Olsson, G.: A radiographic method for assessing changes in alveolar bone height following periodontal therapy.J. Clin. Periodontol. 2: 211–217, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17).
    Carranza, F. A. Jr. and Cabrini, R. L.: Histometric studies of periodontal tissues.Periodontics. 5: 308–312, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18).
    Ellegaard, B., Karring, T., Davis, R. and Loe, H.: New attachment after treatment of intrabony defects in monkeys.J. Periodontol. 45: 368–377, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryuji Sakagami
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Kato
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Periodontology and EndodontologyHokkaido University School of DentistrySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations