Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of mupirocin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus isolated from skin infections

  • Note
  • Published:
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

Abstract

We examined the MIC of mupirocin againstStaphylococcus aureus strains isolated from skin infections between April 1996 and August 1997. None of the 32S. aureus strains collected between April 1996 and September 1996 showed mupirocin-resistance, but 3 of the 58S. aureus strains collected between October 1996 and August 1997 were found to be mupirocin-resistant with a MIC of 32 μg/mL. The 3 patients from whom the mupirocin-resistantS. aureus strains were isolated were outpatients with no previous mupirocin ointment treatment. The 3 mupirocin-resistantS. aureus strains were regarded as different strains on the basis of their coagulase typing, enterotoxin production, and antibiotic sensitivity. Our results suggest that the emergence of mupirocin-resistantS. aureus should be carefully monitored in Japan. Mupirocin ointment should be used only to eradicate nasal carriage of methicillin-resistantS. aureus and long-term use of the ointment should be strictly avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rahman M, Noble WC, Cookson B. Mupirocin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Lancet 1987;2:387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cookson BD, Lacey RW, Noble WC, Reeves DS, Wise R, Redhead RJ. Mupirocin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Lancet 1990;335:1095–1096.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Japanese Society for Chemotherapy. Method for the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria by microdilution method (in Japanese). Chemotherapy 1990;38:102–105.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baird D, Coia J. Mupirocin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Lancet 1987;2:387–388.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gilbart J, Perry CR, Slocombe B. High-level mupirocin resistance inStaphylococcus aureus: evidence for two distinct isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:32–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reagan DR, Doebbeling BN, Pfaller MA, Sheetz CT, Houston AK, Hollis RJ, et al. Elimination of coincidentStaphylococcus aureus nasal and hand carriage with intranasal application of mupirocin ointment. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:101–106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Doebbeling BN, Reagan DR, Pfaller MA, Houston AK, Hollis RJ, Wenzel RP. Long-term efficacy of intranasal mupirocin ointment. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1505–1508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ubukata K, Sugiura M, Konno M, Kunii O, Okinaga K, Kobayashi K, et al. Clinical evaluation of mupirocin nasal ointment on nasal carriage ofStaphylococcus aureus (in Japanese). Chemotherapy 1993;41:1125–1138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Akiyama, H., Yamasaki, O., Kanzaki, H. et al. Detection of mupirocin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus isolated from skin infections. J Infect Chemother 4, 94–96 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489967

Key words

Navigation