Abstract
Ninety-seven methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from patients, staff and the environment in a teaching hospital in Japan were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Two different macrorestriction enzymes (SmaI andSstII) were used to digest the DNA. In this study, after identifying the dominant pattern, the isolates were classified into 4 categories including indistinguishable, closely related, possibly related, and unrelated. While closely related isolates were identified as a subtype, possibly related isolates showing differences of 4 to 6 fragments were difficult to identify either as a subtype or different type. Although there were similar trends in isolate identification by restriction patterns ofSmaI andSstII, some isolates showed a discrepancy. There were 9 isolates categorized as possibly related by eitherSmaI orSstII restriction pattern, and while 2 of the 9 displayed possibly related patterns by both enzymes, 7 showed discrepancies. Among the latter 7 isolates, 1 displayed an indistinguishable pattern by the other macrorestriction enzyme, 5 showed closely related patterns, and 1 showed an unrelated pattern. These discrepancies may help delineate a more precise differentiation of the isolates. Indices of the discriminatory ability of PFGE typing bySmaI andSstII were 0.768 and 0.742. The combination of these 2 enzymes led to an increase in discrimination (D=0.8045). The use of PFGE typing bySmaI andSstII in parallel may enhance discrimination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tenover FC. Plasmid fingerprinting. A tool bacterial strain identification and surveillance of nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Clin Lab Med 1985;5:413–436.
Goh SH, Byrne SK, Zhang JL, Chow AW. Molecular typing ofStaphylococcus aureus on the basis of coagulase gene polymorphisms. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:1642–1645.
Prevost G, Jaulhac B, Piemont Y. DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30: 967–973.
Schlichting C, Branger C, Fournier J, Witte W, Boutonnier A, Wolz C, et al. Typing ofStaphylococcus aureus by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, zymotyping, capsular typing, and phage typing: resolution of clonal relationships. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:227–232.
Saulnier P, Bourneix C, Prevost, G. Andromont A. Random amplified polymorphic DNA assay is less discriminant than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing strains of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:982–985.
Stull TL, Lipuma JJ, Edlind TD. A broad-spectrum probe for molecular epidemiology of bacteria: ribosomal RNA. J Infect Dis 1988;157:280–286.
Cookson BD, Phillips I. Epidemic methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 1988;21: 57–65.
Diamiani G, Telecco S, Comincini S, Sironi M, Carretto E, Marone P. Comparison of an improved RAPD finger-printing with different typing methods for discriminating clinical isolates ofStaphylococcus aureus spp. Eur J Epidemiol 1996;12:163–169.
Kluytmans J, Leeuwen van W, Goessens W, Hollis R, Messer S, Herwaldt L, et al. Food-initiated outbreak of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus analyzed by pheno- and genotyping. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1121–1128.
Struelens MJ, Deplane A, Godard C, Maes N, Serruys E. Epidemiologic typing and delineation of genetic relatedness of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus by macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30: 2599–2605.
Tabe Y, Nakamura Y, Misawa N. Epidemiological study on nasal carriage of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus within the nursing home for aged (in Japanese). Environ Infect 1996;11:134–140.
Cookson BD, Aparicio P, Deplano A, Struelens M, Goering R, Marples R. Inter-centre comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for the typing of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol 1996;44: 179–184.
Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2233–2239.
Udo EE, Al-Obaid IA, Jacob LE, Chugh TD. Molecular characterization of epidemic ciprofloxacin- and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus strains colonizing, patients in an intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:3242–3244.
Tabe Y, Misawa N, Nakamura Y. Epidemiological study on nasal carriage of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus within the nursing home for the aged—part 2 (in Japanese), Environ Infect 1997;12:206–210.
Mulligan ME, Arbeirt RD. Epidemiologic and clinical utility of typing systems for differentiating among strains of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:20–28.
Mulligan ME, Kwok RY, Citron DM. Immunoblots, antimicrobial resistance, and bacteriophage typing of oxacillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:2395–2401.
Hartstein AL, Morthland VH, Eng S, Archer GL, Schoenknecht FD, Rashad AL. Restriction enzyme analysis of plasmid DNA and bacteriophage typing of pairedStaphylococcus aureus blood culture isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1989;8:1874–1879.
Cookson B, Talsania H, Naidoo J. Strategies for typing and properties of epidemic methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1986;6:702–709.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. 3rd ed. Approved standard M7-A3. Villanova, PA: NCCLS, 1993: Vol. 13.
Tenover FC, Arbeit R, Archer G, Biddle J, Byrne S, Goering R, et al. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates ofStaphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:407–415.
Hunter PR, Gaston MA. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:2465–2466.
Hunter PR. Reproducibility and indices of discriminatory power of microbial typing methods. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1903–1905.
Hunter PR, Fraser CAM. Application of a numerical index of discriminatory power to a comparison of four physiochemical typing methods forCandida albicans. J Clin Microbiol 1989;27:2156–2160.
Archer GL, Mayhall CG. Comparison of epidemiological markers used in the investigation of an outbreak of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus infections. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:395–399.
Ichiyama S, Ohta M, Shimokata K, Kato N, Takeuchi J. Genomic DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as an epidemiological marker for study of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:2690–2695.
Hall LMC. Are point mutations or DNA rearrangements responsible for the restriction fragment length polymorphisms that are used to type bacteria? Microbiology 1994; 140:197–204.
Grothues D, Koopmann U, von der Hardt H, Tummler B. Genome fingerprinting ofPseudomonas aerunginosa indicates colonization of cystic fibrosis siblings with closely related strains. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:1973–1977.
Struelens MJ, Schwam V, Deplane A, Baran D. Genome macrorestriction analysis of diversity and variability ofPseudomonas aeruginosa strains infecting cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2320–2326.
Branger C, Gardye C, Lambert-Zechovsky N. Persistence ofStaphylococcus aureus strains among cystic fibrosis patients over extended periods of time. J Med Microbiol 1996;45:294–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Tabe, Y., Saionji, K., Nakamura, A. et al. Epidemiologic typing of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus by macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA using two different restriction enzymes. J Infect Chemother 4, 56–63 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489962
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489962