Skip to main content
Log in

Epidemiologic typing of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus by macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA using two different restriction enzymes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Ninety-seven methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from patients, staff and the environment in a teaching hospital in Japan were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Two different macrorestriction enzymes (SmaI andSstII) were used to digest the DNA. In this study, after identifying the dominant pattern, the isolates were classified into 4 categories including indistinguishable, closely related, possibly related, and unrelated. While closely related isolates were identified as a subtype, possibly related isolates showing differences of 4 to 6 fragments were difficult to identify either as a subtype or different type. Although there were similar trends in isolate identification by restriction patterns ofSmaI andSstII, some isolates showed a discrepancy. There were 9 isolates categorized as possibly related by eitherSmaI orSstII restriction pattern, and while 2 of the 9 displayed possibly related patterns by both enzymes, 7 showed discrepancies. Among the latter 7 isolates, 1 displayed an indistinguishable pattern by the other macrorestriction enzyme, 5 showed closely related patterns, and 1 showed an unrelated pattern. These discrepancies may help delineate a more precise differentiation of the isolates. Indices of the discriminatory ability of PFGE typing bySmaI andSstII were 0.768 and 0.742. The combination of these 2 enzymes led to an increase in discrimination (D=0.8045). The use of PFGE typing bySmaI andSstII in parallel may enhance discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tenover FC. Plasmid fingerprinting. A tool bacterial strain identification and surveillance of nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Clin Lab Med 1985;5:413–436.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goh SH, Byrne SK, Zhang JL, Chow AW. Molecular typing ofStaphylococcus aureus on the basis of coagulase gene polymorphisms. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:1642–1645.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Prevost G, Jaulhac B, Piemont Y. DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30: 967–973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schlichting C, Branger C, Fournier J, Witte W, Boutonnier A, Wolz C, et al. Typing ofStaphylococcus aureus by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, zymotyping, capsular typing, and phage typing: resolution of clonal relationships. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:227–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saulnier P, Bourneix C, Prevost, G. Andromont A. Random amplified polymorphic DNA assay is less discriminant than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing strains of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:982–985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stull TL, Lipuma JJ, Edlind TD. A broad-spectrum probe for molecular epidemiology of bacteria: ribosomal RNA. J Infect Dis 1988;157:280–286.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cookson BD, Phillips I. Epidemic methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 1988;21: 57–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diamiani G, Telecco S, Comincini S, Sironi M, Carretto E, Marone P. Comparison of an improved RAPD finger-printing with different typing methods for discriminating clinical isolates ofStaphylococcus aureus spp. Eur J Epidemiol 1996;12:163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kluytmans J, Leeuwen van W, Goessens W, Hollis R, Messer S, Herwaldt L, et al. Food-initiated outbreak of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus analyzed by pheno- and genotyping. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1121–1128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Struelens MJ, Deplane A, Godard C, Maes N, Serruys E. Epidemiologic typing and delineation of genetic relatedness of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus by macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30: 2599–2605.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tabe Y, Nakamura Y, Misawa N. Epidemiological study on nasal carriage of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus within the nursing home for aged (in Japanese). Environ Infect 1996;11:134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cookson BD, Aparicio P, Deplano A, Struelens M, Goering R, Marples R. Inter-centre comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for the typing of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol 1996;44: 179–184.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2233–2239.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Udo EE, Al-Obaid IA, Jacob LE, Chugh TD. Molecular characterization of epidemic ciprofloxacin- and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus strains colonizing, patients in an intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:3242–3244.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tabe Y, Misawa N, Nakamura Y. Epidemiological study on nasal carriage of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus within the nursing home for the aged—part 2 (in Japanese), Environ Infect 1997;12:206–210.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mulligan ME, Arbeirt RD. Epidemiologic and clinical utility of typing systems for differentiating among strains of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:20–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mulligan ME, Kwok RY, Citron DM. Immunoblots, antimicrobial resistance, and bacteriophage typing of oxacillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:2395–2401.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartstein AL, Morthland VH, Eng S, Archer GL, Schoenknecht FD, Rashad AL. Restriction enzyme analysis of plasmid DNA and bacteriophage typing of pairedStaphylococcus aureus blood culture isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1989;8:1874–1879.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cookson B, Talsania H, Naidoo J. Strategies for typing and properties of epidemic methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1986;6:702–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. 3rd ed. Approved standard M7-A3. Villanova, PA: NCCLS, 1993: Vol. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tenover FC, Arbeit R, Archer G, Biddle J, Byrne S, Goering R, et al. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates ofStaphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:407–415.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hunter PR, Gaston MA. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:2465–2466.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hunter PR. Reproducibility and indices of discriminatory power of microbial typing methods. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1903–1905.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hunter PR, Fraser CAM. Application of a numerical index of discriminatory power to a comparison of four physiochemical typing methods forCandida albicans. J Clin Microbiol 1989;27:2156–2160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Archer GL, Mayhall CG. Comparison of epidemiological markers used in the investigation of an outbreak of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus infections. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:395–399.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ichiyama S, Ohta M, Shimokata K, Kato N, Takeuchi J. Genomic DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as an epidemiological marker for study of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:2690–2695.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hall LMC. Are point mutations or DNA rearrangements responsible for the restriction fragment length polymorphisms that are used to type bacteria? Microbiology 1994; 140:197–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Grothues D, Koopmann U, von der Hardt H, Tummler B. Genome fingerprinting ofPseudomonas aerunginosa indicates colonization of cystic fibrosis siblings with closely related strains. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:1973–1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Struelens MJ, Schwam V, Deplane A, Baran D. Genome macrorestriction analysis of diversity and variability ofPseudomonas aeruginosa strains infecting cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2320–2326.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Branger C, Gardye C, Lambert-Zechovsky N. Persistence ofStaphylococcus aureus strains among cystic fibrosis patients over extended periods of time. J Med Microbiol 1996;45:294–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Tabe, Y., Saionji, K., Nakamura, A. et al. Epidemiologic typing of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus by macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA using two different restriction enzymes. J Infect Chemother 4, 56–63 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489962

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02489962

Key words

Navigation