Advertisement

The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi

, Volume 105, Issue 4, pp 625–638 | Cite as

Seed coat anatomy ofCrossostylis (Rhizophoraceae): its evolutionary and systematic implications

  • Hiroaki Setoguchi
  • Hiroshi Tobe
  • Hideaki Ohba
Article

Abstract

The seed coat structure of all 13 species ofCrossostylis was studied to contribute to an understanding of species delimitation and relationships within the genus. The mature seed coat is relatively uniform and consistently constructed mainly by a well-developed exotesta and a well-developed fibrous exotegmen. The species differ in the thickness of the exotesta and exotegmen, the anatomy of exotestal cells, the presence and absence of persistent mesotesta, and so forth. On the basis of comparisons of these characters, close relationships are suggested in the species groups such as:Crossostylis banksiana andC. cominsii; C. biflora, C. raiateensis andC. multiflora; C. gandiflora, C. sebertii andC. imera; and five species in the Fiji Islands. These relationships except for those of Fijian five species are also supported by cladistics as their common characters are evaluated as synapomorphy. Species-level separation ofC. banksiana, C. pedunculata andC. raiateensis each from the closest species is doubted based on the results of seed coat structure.

Key words

Crossostylis Evolution Rhizophoraceae Seed Seed coat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brongniart, M.H.A., andA. Gris. 1870. Diverses plantes Nouvelles ou peu connues de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Ann. Sc. Nat. Ser. 5,13: 340–404.Google Scholar
  2. Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The Seeds of Dicotyledons. vol. 1 and 2. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Guillaumin, A. 1931. Contribution to the flora of the New Hebrides. J. Arnold Arb.12: 221–264.Google Scholar
  4. Hou, D. andC.G.G.J. van Steenis. 1963.Crossostylis.In C.G.G.J. van Steenis, ed., Pacific Plants Areas. Vol. 1, pp. 290–291. Manila Bureau of Printing, Manila.Google Scholar
  5. Juncosa, A.M. andH. Tobe. 1988. Embryology of tribe Gynotrocheae (Rhizophoraceae) and its developmental and systematic implications. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1410–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. — andP.B. Tomlinson. 1988. Systematic comparison and some biological characters of Rhizophoraceae and Anisophylleaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1296–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moore, J.W. 1963. Notes on Raiatean flowering plants. Bishop Mus. Bull.226: 1–36.Google Scholar
  8. Schmid, R. 1986. On Cornerian and other terminology of angiospermous and gymnospermous seed coats: historical perspective and terminological recommendations. Taxon35: 476–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. —, andM.D. Turner. 1977. Contrad 70, an effective softener of herbarium material for anatomical study. Taxon26: 551–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith, A.C. 1952. Studies of pacific island plants, XI. Further notes on Fijian flowering plants. J. Arnold Arb.33: 97–118.Google Scholar
  11. — 1981. Flora Vitiensis Nova. Vol. 2. Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, Lawai.Google Scholar
  12. Tobe, H. andP.H. Raven. 1988. Seed morphology and anatomy of Rhizophoraceae, inter- and infrafamilial relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1319–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroaki Setoguchi
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Tobe
    • 2
  • Hideaki Ohba
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany, University Museumthe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biology, College of Liberal Arts and SciencesKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations