Skip to main content
Log in

Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of nymphaeales

III. Floral anatomy ofBrasenia schreberi Gmel. andCabomba caroliniana A. Gray

  • Published:
The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Floral morphology ofBrasenia schreberi Gmel. andCabomba caroliniana A. Gray was observed chiefly from an anatomical point of view. The receptacle ofB. schreberi is rather flat and a vascular plexus is observable in the mature flower. The vasculature in this plexus is so complex taht it is not easy to trace its structure in detail. by observation on small buds, it can be seen that the receptacular vasculature consists of a girdling bundle in the basal area and usually nine receptacular strands from which traces to the petals and stamens branch off. The vasculature in the receptacle is reconstructed and diagramatically shown as though split longitudinally and spread out in one plane.

Floral vasculature inCabomba caroliniana is simpler, and is probably related to the smaller number of stamens and carpels. It also has a girdling bundle at the bottom of receptacle and this vasculature is suggested to be derived by simplification from aBrasenia-type vasculature.

Evidence from floral anatomy suggests that these two genera are closely related. InNymphaea, a vascular plexus in the receptacle is also observed (Moseley, 1961; Ito 1983). The plexus ofBrasenia andNymphaea are not the same in their construction. Nevertheless, their fundamental floral vasculature is comparable and it is preferable to place them in the same family or same order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burger, W.C. 1977. The Piperales and the Monocots. Alternate hypotheses for the origin of monocotyledonous flowers. Bot. Rev.43: 345–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspary, R. 1891. Nymphaeaceae.In: A. Engler and K. Prantl, ed., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien Part III, ser 2. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, M.E. 1980. Recent and tertiary seeds of the Nymphaeaceae sensu lato with a revison ofBrasenia ovula (Brong.) Reid and Chandler. Ann. Bot.46: 603–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conard, H.S. 1905. The Waterlilies. Carnegie Inst., Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A.J. 1961. Morphology of the Angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckardt, T. 1937. Untersuehngen über Morphologie, Entwichlungsgeschichte und systematische Bedeutung der pseudomonomeren Gynoeciums. Nova Acta Leopold. N.F.5: 1–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. 1837. Cabombaceae. Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. N.Y.4: 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldeniewska-Furmanowa, M. 1970. Comparative leaf anatomy and alkaloid content in the Nymphaeaceae. Monogr. Bot.31: 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M. 1982. On the embryos and seedlings of the Nymphaeaceae. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.33: 143–148 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983. Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of Nymphaeales. I. The morphology of vascular bundles in the flower ofNymphaea tetragona George. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.34: 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1984. Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of Nymphaeales. II. Floral anatomy ofNymphaea tetragona George. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.35: 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. 1955. Classification and phylogeny of Nymphaeaceae and allied families. Amer. Mid. Nat.54: 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, M.F. 1961. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. II. The flower ofNymphaea. Bot. Gaz.122: 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1965. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. III. The floral anatomy ofNuphar. Phytomorphology15: 54–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1968. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. VI. Development of flower ofNuphar. Phytomorphology21: 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1984. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. XIII. Contributions to the vegetative and floral structure ofCabomba. Amer. J. Bot.71: 902–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, F.C. 1968. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. IV. Structure and development of the flower ofBrasenia schreberi Gmel. Univ. Calif. Pub. Bot.47: 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E.L. 1976. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. VIII. The floral anatomy ofVictoria Schomb. (Nymphaeaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. London72: 115–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solereder, H. 1908. Systematic Anatomy of the Dicotyledons Vol. 1, English ed. Clerendon Press, Oxyford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering Plants. English ed. Oliver and Boyd Ltd., Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev.46: 225–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, M. 1982. Relationship ofBarclaya and classification of Nymphaeales. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.33: 336–345 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueno J. andS. Kitaguchi 1961. On the fine structure of the pollen walls of Angiospermae. I. Nymphaeaceae. J. Biol. Osaka City Univ.12: 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, M. Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of nymphaeales. Bot Mag Tokyo 99, 169–184 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488818

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488818

Key words

Navigation