Skip to main content
Log in

The morphology and anatomy ofHydrastis (Ranunculales): Systematic reevaluation of the genus

  • Published:
The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence from morphology and anatomy (including embryology), as well as from palynology, chemistry and cytology, indicates thatHydrastis is quite divergent from Ranunculaceae (in which the genus has been most often included) as well as from both Glaucidiaceae and Berberidaceae. Distinctive features ofHydrastis, which demarcate it from Ranunculaceae but which are sometimes shared by Berberidaceae, are: the unique mode of origin of the vascular supply to stamens and carpels; the micropyle being formed by both integuments; the xylem not V-shaped in cross section; scalariform vessel perforations present; haploid chromosome number 13; pollen tectum consisting of a compound layer of striae; leaf mesophyll not differentiated; the unique course of stem medullary bundles; D-galactose present. Its distinctive higher haploid chromosome number, as well as its many less-specialized character states (in floral structure, leaf anatomy, and xylem and vessel morphology), suggest thatHydrastis is a relictual primitive group which diverged early from a common ancestral stock of Ranunculaceae, Berberidaceae and probably of Circaeasteraceae; at least some of the features shared byHydrastis and one or another of the families concerned seem to be a heritage from their common ancestor. We propose a reestablishment of a monotypic family, Hydrastidaceae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baillon, H. 1867. Historie des Plantes. Vol. I. Paris.

  • Bentham, G. and J.D. Hooker. 1862. Genera Plantarum. Vol. I. London.

  • Blaque, G. andJ. Maheu. 1926. Les falsifications actuelles de l'Hydrastis canadensis. Bull. Sci. Pharmacol.33: 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, F. andJ.I.M. Calis. 1977. Integumentary shifting—a third way to unitegmy. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.90: 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, H. 1891. A contribution to the life-history ofHydrastis canadensis. Bot. Gaz. (Craw-fordsville)16: 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouland, M. 1935. Recherches sur l'anatomie florale des Renonculacées. Botaniste27: 1–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchheim, G. 1964. Reihe Ranunculales.In: H. Melchior, ed., A. Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 12, Aufl.2: 131–147. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M. 1936. Carpel anatomy of the Berberidaceae. Amer. J. Bot.23: 340–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chute, M. 1930. The morphology and anatomy of the achene. Amer. J. Bot.17: 703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1968. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. Nelson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.L. 1966. Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Candolle, A.P. 1824. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis. Paris.

  • Delpino, F. 1899. Rapporti tra la evoluzione e la distribuzione geographica della Ranunculaceae. Mem. Reale Accad. Sci. Inst. Bologna8: 17–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A.J. 1961. Morphology of the Angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A. 1903. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 3 Aufl. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andL. Diels. 1936. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Il Aufl. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francini, E. 1931. Lo sviluppo del sistema conduttore in plantule diHydrastis canadensis L. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital.38: 336–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. 1848. The Genera of the Plants of the United States. Boston.

  • Guédès, M. 1977. Le gynécée dePodophyllum (Berbéridacées): monomérie vraie et placentation suturale de la portion congénitalement close du carpelle. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci.285: 755–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, A. 1927. Cormofyternas Fylogeni. Lund.

  • Himmelbaur, W. 1913. Die Berberidaceen und ihre Stellung im System. Denkschr. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl.89: 733–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, T. 1899.Podophyllum peltatum, a morphological study. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)27: 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1913. Medical plants of North America: 75.Hydrastis canadensis. Merck's Rep.22: 202–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hus, H. 1907. The germination ofHydrastis canadensis. Ann. Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard.18: 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iriki, Y. andH. Minamisawa. 1983. D-galactose and a ribitol-like substance inHydrastis canadensis L. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi57: 319–321.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janchen, B. 1948. Die Systematische Gliederung der Ranunculaceen und Berberidaceen. Denkschr. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl.108: 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, U. 1968. Serologische Beiträge zur Systematik der Ranunculaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.88: 269–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussieu, A.L. De. 1789. Genera Plantarum. Paris.

  • Kaplan, D.R. 1975. Comparative developmental evaluation of the morphology of unifacial leaves in the monocotyledons. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.95: 1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaute, U. 1963. Beiträge zur Morphologie des Gynoeceums der Berberidaceen mit einem Anhang über die Rhizomknospe vonPlagiorhegma dubium. Doktordissertation, Universität Berlin.

  • Kumazawa, M. 1930a. Studies on the structure of Japanese species ofRanunculus. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot.2: 297–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1930b. Morphology and biology ofGlaucidium palmatum Sieb. et Zucc. with notes of affinities to the allied generaHydrastis, Podophyllum andDiphylleia. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot.2: 345–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1930c. Structure and affinities ofGlaucidium and its allied genera. Bot. Mag. Tokyo44: 479–490 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1932. The medullary bundle system in the Ranunculaceae and allied plants. Bot. Mag. Tokyo46: 327–332 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1935. The structure and affinities ofPaeonia. Bot. Mag. Tokyo49: 306–315 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1936. Pollen grain morphology in Ranunculaceae, Lardizabalaceae and Berberidaceae. Jap. J. Bot.8: 19–46, 5 plates.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1937a. Comparative studies on the vernation in the Ranunculaceae and Berberidaceae. J. Jap. Bot.13: 573–586, 659–669, 713–726 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1973b.Ranzania japonica (Berberidac.). Its morphology, biology and systematic affinities. Jap. J. Bot.9: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1938a. On the ovular structure in the Ranunculaceae and Berberidaceae. J. Jap. Bot.14: 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1938b. Systematic and phylogenetic consideration of the Ranunculaceae and Berberidaceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo52: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurita, M. 1967. Chromosome studies in Ranunculaceae. XXV. Mem. Ehime Univ., Sect. 2, Nat. Sci.5: 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlet, O. 1928. Einige Beobachtungen über die Zytologie der Berberidazeen. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.22: 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinfellner, W. 1957. Zur Morphologie des Gynoezeums vonBerberis. Oesterr. Bot. Z.103: 600–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemesle, R. 1948. Position phylogénétique de l'Hydrastis canadensis L. et duCrossosoma californicum Nutt., d'après les particularités histologiques du xylème. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci.227: 221–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1950. L'Hydrastis canadensis L. et ses principales falsifications. Rev. Gén. Bot.57: 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1955. Contribution a l'etude de quelques familles de dicotyledones considerees comme primitives. Phytomorphology5: 11–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, J. 1831. An Introduction to the Natural system of Botany. C. & C. & H. Carvill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaus, C. 1759. Systema Naturae. 10 ed. Stockholm.

  • Lloyd, J.U. andC.G. Lloyd. 1884/85. Drugs and Medicines of North America. Robert Clarke Co., Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotsy, J.P. 1911. Vorträge über botanische Stammesgeschichte. Jena.

  • Marié, P. 1885. Recherches sur la structure des Renonculacées. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot.20: 5–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maue, G. 1926. Zur Pharmakognosie der Ranunculaceen und Berberidaceen. Anatomie des Laubblattes. Doktordissertation, Universität Basel.

  • Mauritzon, J. 1936. Zur Embryologie der Berberidaceen. Acta Horti Gothob.11: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.R. andL. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyaji, Y. 1930. Beiträge zur Chromosomenphylogenie der Berberidaceen. Planta11: 650–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicke, J.W. andJ.J. Skvarla. 1981. Pollen morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the Berberidaceae. Smithsonian Contri. Bot.50: 1–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • . 1982. Pollen morphology and the relationships ofCircaeaster, ofKingdonia and, ofSargentodoxa to the Ranunculales. Amer. J. Bot.69: 990–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, J. 1894. Botanische Mitteilung überHydrastis canadensis. Biblioth. Bot.29: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prantl, K. 1888. Beiträge zur Morphologie und Systematik der Ranunculaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.9: 225–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastri, R.L.N. 1969. Floral morphology, embryology, and relationships of the Berberidaceae. Aust. J. Bot.17: 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, K. 1897. Die Morphologie einiger Drogen. Arch. Pharm. (Berlin)235: 592–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearn, W.T. 1973. Botanical Latin. 2 ed. David & Charles, Newton Abbot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. 1966. A System and Phylogeny of the Flowering Plants. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. (Lancaster)46: 225–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, M. 1962a. Petiolar anatomy in the Ranunculaceae. Sci. Rep. S. Coll. N. Coll. Osaka Univ.11: 19–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1962b. Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae. I. Sci. Rep. S. Coll. N. Coll. Osaka Univ.11: 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1962c. Taxonomical and phylogenetical consideration of the Ranunculaceae. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.20: 71–81 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1963. Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae. II. Sci. Rep. S. Coll. N. Coll. Osaka Univ.12: 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1964. Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae. III. Sci. Rep. S. Coll. N. Coll. Osaka Univ.13: 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1965. Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae. IV. Sci. Rep. S. Coll. N. Coll. Osaka Univ.14: 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1966. Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae. VI. Sci. Rep. S. Coll. N. Coll. Osaka Univ.15: 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1972. Morphology and phyletic relationship of the Glaucidiaceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo85: 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — andY. Mizumoto. 1972. Stages of embryo development in ripe seeds of achenes of the Ranunculaceae. J. Jap. Bot.47: 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terabayashi, S. 1977. Studies in the morphology and systematics of Berberidaceae. I. Floral anatomy ofRanzania japonica. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.28: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1978. Studies in the morphology and systematics of Berberidaceae. II. Floral anatomy ofMahonia japonica (Thunb.) DC. andBerberis thunbergii DC. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.30: 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1979. Studies in the morphology and systematics of Berberidaceae. III. Floral anatomy ofEpimedium grandiflorum Morren subsp.sempervirens (Nakai) Kitamura andVancouveria hexandra (Hooker) Morren et Decne. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.30: 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1981. Studies in the morphology and systematics of Berberidaceae. IV. Floral anatomy ofPlagiorhegma dubia Maxim.,Jeffersonia diphylla (L.) Pers. andAchlys triphylla (Smith) DC. subsp.japonica (Maxim.) Kitam. Bot. Mag. Tokyo94: 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1983a. Studies in the morphology and systematics of berberidaceae. V. Floral anatomy ofCaulophyllum, Leontice, Gymnospermium andBongardia. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto Univ., Ser. Biol.8: 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983b. Studies in the morphology and systematics of Berberidaceae. VI. Floral anatomy ofDiphylleia, Podophyllum andDysosma. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.34: 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R.F. 1974. A phylogenetic classification of the Annoniflorae. Aliso8: 147–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1976. A phylogenetic classification of the angiosperms. Evol. Biol.9: 35–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischler, G. 1902. Die Berberidaceen und Podophyllaceen. Versuch einer morphologisch-biologischen Monographie. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.31: 596–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobe, H. 1980. Morphological studies on the genusClematis Linn., VI. Vascular anatomy of the androecial and gynoecial regions of the floral receptacle. Bot. Mag. Tokyo93: 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1981. Embryological studies inGlaucidium palmatum Sieb. et Zucc. with a discussion on the taxonomy of the genus. Bot. Mag. Tokyo94: 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayaraghavan, M.R. 1970. Ranunculaceae. Bull. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad.41: 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, R. 1910/11. Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik. 2. Aufl. Wien-Leibzig.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tobe, H., Keating, R.C. The morphology and anatomy ofHydrastis (Ranunculales): Systematic reevaluation of the genus. Bot Mag Tokyo 98, 291–316 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488779

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488779

Key words

Navigation