Skip to main content
Log in

Biphasic effect of red light on the growth of coleoptiles in etiolated barley seedlings

  • Published:
The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

InHordeum vulgare cultivar “Kirin-choku No. 1”, the final length of intact coleoptiles of totally etiolated seedlings was approximately twice as long as that of those grown under continuous red light. The fluence response curve of the latter was biphasic; the low-energy effect was saturated by red light of ca. 50 J m−2 which gave rise to about 40% of the maximum inhibition by continuous irradiation with red light of 1.2 W m−2, whereas the high-energy effect was induced by irradiation for 1 hr or longer.

Coleoptiles of 3-day-old seedlings were most sensitive to light causing the low-energy effect, which was repeatedly red/far-red reversible. The growth inhibition was correlated to the photometrically measured percentage of Pfr so that the maximum effect was induced by red light of 50 J m−2 which transformed 70% of phytochrome to Pfr in the coleoptile tip.

Wavelength dependence of the high-energy effect showed that monochromatic light of 400, 600 and 650 nm greatly inhibited the coleoptile growth, whereas light of 700 and 750 nm promoted it instead. The effect was also induced by intermittent irradiation with red light, and the more frequently the intermittent treatment was given, the more the growth was inhibited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Pr:

red light absorbing form of phytochrome

Pfr:

far-red light absorbing form of phytochrome

Δ(ΔA):

difference absorbance change between 730 nm and 800 nm

g fr wt:

g fresh weight

SE:

standard error

References

  • Briggs, W.R. andH.W. Siegelman. 1965. Distribution of phytochrome in etiolated seedlings. Plant Physiol.40: 934–941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buttler, W.L., S.B. Hendricks andH.W. Siegelman. 1964. Action spectra of phytochromein vitro. Photochem. Photobiol.3: 521–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. andJ.E. Shuttleworth. 1974. The role of the cotyledons in the photocontrol of hypocotyl extension inCucumis sativus L. Planta117:57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, W.M. andJ. Shen-Miller. 1976. Similarity in dose responses, action spectra and red light responses between phototropism and photoinhibition of growth. Photochem. Photobiol.23: 195–199.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Furuya, M. andW.S. Hillman. 1964. Observations on spectrophotometrically assayable phytochromein vivo in etiolatedPisum seedlings. Planta63: 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, W.S. andW.K. Purves. 1966. Light responses, growth factors and phytochrome transformations ofCucumis seedling tissues. Planta70: 275–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jose, A.M. andD. Vince-Prue. 1977. Action spectra for the inhibition of growth in radish hypocotyls. Planta136: 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, V.R. andR.L. Weintraub. 1975. Effects of red light on the growth of intact wheat and barley coleoptiles. Plant Physiol.56: 44–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, H. 1957. Der Einfluss monochromatischer Strahlung auf das Längenswachstum des Hypocotyls und auf die Anthocyanbiling bei Keimlingen vonSinapis alba L. (=Brassica alba Boiss.). Planta49: 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975. Lectures on photomorphogenesis. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. Die Steuerung des Hypokotylwachstums bei den Keimlingen vonLactuca sativa L. Durch sichtbare Strahlung. Planta55: 438–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul R. andM. Furuya. 1973. Phytochrome action inOryza sativa L. VI. Red far-red reversible effect on early development of coleoptiles. Bot. Mag Tokyo86: 203–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pjon, C.J. andM. Furuya. 1967. Phytochrome action inOryza sativa L.I. Growth responses of etiolated coleoptiles to red, far-red and blue light. Plant Cell Physiol.8: 709–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and — 1968. Phytochrome action inOryza sativa L. II. The spectrophotometric versus the physiological status of phytochrome in coleoptiles. Planta81: 303–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roesel, H.A. andA.H. Haber. 1963. Studies of effects of light on growth pattern and of gibberellin sensitivity in relation to age, growth rate, and illumination in intact wheat coleoptiles. Plant Physiol.38: 523–532.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sale, P.J.M. andD. Vince. 1963. Some effects of light on leaf growth inPisum sativum andTropaeolum majus. Photochem. Photobiol.2: 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhoff, L.N., P.H. Quail andW.R. Briggs. 1979. Red light-inhibited mesocotyl elongation in maize seedlings II. Kinetic and spectral studies. Plant Physiol.63: 1062–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, M. andM. Furuya. 1974. Action spectrum of phototaxis in cryptomonad alga,Cryptomonas sp. Plant Cell Physiol.15: 413–420.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K.T. andM. Furuya. 1975. Photoreversible bindingin vitro of cytosolic phytochrome to particulate fraction isolated from pea epicotyls. Planta127: 177–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uematsu, H., Hosoda, H. & Furuya, M. Biphasic effect of red light on the growth of coleoptiles in etiolated barley seedlings. Bot Mag Tokyo 94, 273–283 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488616

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488616

Key words

Navigation