Advertisement

Phylogenetic systematics of the nymphaeales

  • Motomi Ito
Article

Abstract

A cladistic analysis was applied to reveal the phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphaeales. Seventeen out of twenty three characters in gross morphology, anatomy and palynology were analyzed, for their evolutionary polarities. From the results of the present analysis, the phylogenetic status of each genus and their relationships were clarified: 1)Nelumbo is a distinct taxon and is presumed to have originated from an ancestral stock of the Nymphaeales; 2)Ceratophyllum has a close phylogenetic relationship withCabomba; and 3) in the Nymphaeaceaesensu stricto, Nuphar and the remaining genral constitute a monophyletic group.

A conclusion obtained from the present analysis was that the following three families should be recognized in the Nymphaeales; Nelumbonaceae Nymphaeaceae, and Ceratophyllaceae. The generaBrasenia andCabomba are traditionally classified in the Nymphaeaceae or in the independent family Cabombaceae. However, they should be included in the family Ceratophyllaceae.

Key words

Ceratophyllaceae Cladistic analysis Nelumbonaceae Nymphaeaceae Nymphaeales Phylogenetic systematics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, I.W. andB.G. Swamy. 1951. The conduplicate carpel of dicotyledons and its initial trends of specialization. Amer. J. Bot.38: 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brundin, L. 1972. Phylogenetics and biogeography. Syst. Zool.21: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burger, W.C. 1977. The Piperales and the Monocots. Alternate hypotheses for the origin of monocotyledonous flowers. Bot. Rev.43: 345–393.Google Scholar
  4. Caspary, R. 1891. Nymphaeaceae.In: A. Engler and K. Prantl, ed., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Part III, ser.2 Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  5. Carlquist, S. 1969. Toward acceptable evolutionary interpretations of floral anatomy. Phytomorphology19: 332–363.Google Scholar
  6. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Eames, A.J. 1961. Morphology of the Angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Eckardt, T. 1937. Untersüchungen über Morphologie, Entwichlungs geschichte und systematische Bedeutung der pseudomonomenren Gynoeceums. Nova Acta Leopold. N. F.5: 1–112.Google Scholar
  9. Erdtman, G. 1960. The acetolysis method. Sven. Bot. Tidskr.54: 561–564.Google Scholar
  10. — 1966. An Introduction to Palynology, vol. 1: Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy; Angiosperms. Hafner Publ., New York.Google Scholar
  11. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  12. Hutchinson, J. 1973. The Families of Flowering Plants, 3 ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Ito, M. 1983. Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of Nymphaeales. I. The morphology of vascular bundles in the flower ofNymphaea tetragona George. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.34: 18–26.Google Scholar
  14. — 1984. Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of Nymphaeales. II. Floral anatomy ofNymphaea tetragona George. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.35: 94–102.Google Scholar
  15. — 1986a. Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of Nymphaeales. III. Floral morphology and anatomy ofBrasenia schreberi Gmel. andCabomba caroliniana A. Gray. Bot. Mag. Tokyo99: 169–184.Google Scholar
  16. — 1986b. Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of Nymphaeales. IV. Floral anatomy ofNelumbo nucifera. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.37: 82–96.Google Scholar
  17. Li, H. 1955. Classification and phylogeny of Nymphaeaceae, and allied, families. Amer. Mid. Nat.54: 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meeuse, A.D.J. 1966. Fundamentals of Phytomorphology. Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Moseley, M.F. 1961. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. II. The flower ofNymphaea. Bot. Gaz.122: 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. — 1965. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. III. The floral anatomy ofNuphar. Phytomorphology15: 54–84.Google Scholar
  21. —,I.J. Metha, P.S., Williamson andH. Kosakai. 1984. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. XIII. Contributions to the vegetative and floral structure ofCabomba. Amer. J. Bot.71: 902–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. — andN.W., Uhl. 1985. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae sensu lato. XV. The anatomy of the flower ofNelumbo Bot. Jahrb, Syst.106: 61–98.Google Scholar
  23. Müller, J. 1970. Description of pollen grains ofOndinea purpurea den Hartog. Blumea18: 416–417.Google Scholar
  24. Richardson, F.C. 1968. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. IV. Structure and development of the flower ofBrasenia schreberi Geml. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.47: 1–101.Google Scholar
  25. Schaffener, J.H. 1904. Some morphological pecularities of the Nymphaeaceae and Helobiae. Ohio Nat.4: 83–92.Google Scholar
  26. Schneider, E.L. 1976. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. VIII. The floral anatomy ofVictoria Schomb. (Nymphaeaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc.72: 115–148.Google Scholar
  27. —. 1978. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. IX. The seed ofBarclaya longifolia Wall. Bot. Gaz.139: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. — andM. Jeter. 1982. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. XII. The floral biology ofCabomba caroliniana. Amer. J. Bot.69: 1410–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sporne, K.R. 1974. Girdling vascular bundles in dicotyledons flowers. Gard Bull. Sing.29: 165–173.Google Scholar
  30. Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering Plants. English ed. Oliver and Boyd Ltd., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  31. —. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plant (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev.46: 225–359.Google Scholar
  32. Tamura, M. 1982. Relationship ofBarclaya and classification of Nymphaeales Acta Phytotax. Geobot.33: 336–345 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  33. Thorne, R.F. 1983. Proposed new realignments in the angiosperms. Nord. J. Bot.3: 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Troll, W. 1933. Beitrage zur Morphologie des Gynaeceums. 4 Über das Gynaeceum der Nymphaeaceen. Planta21: 447–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walker J.W. 1974a. Evolution of exine structure in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.61: 891–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. — 1974b. Aperture evolution in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.61: 1112–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. —. 1976a. Comparative pollen morphology and phylogeny of the ranalian complex.In: C.B. Beck, ed., Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms p. 241–299. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  38. — 1976b. Evolutionary significance of the exine in the pollen of primitive angiosperms.In: I.K. Ferguson and J. Müller, ed., The Evolutionary Significance of the Exine p. 251–308. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  39. Weidlich, W.H. 1976a. The organization of the vascular system in the stem of the Nymphaeaceae. I.Nymphaea subgeneraCastalia andHydrocallis. Amer. J. Bot.63: 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. —. 1976b. The organization of the vascular system in the stem of the Nymphaeaceae. II.Nymphaea subgeneraAnecphua, Lotus and,Brachyceras. Amer. J. Bot.63: 1365–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiley, E.O. 1981. Phylogenetics. Wiley-Interscience Publ., New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Motomi Ito
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany, Faculty of scienceKyoto UniversityKyoto

Personalised recommendations