Skip to main content
Log in

Floral ontogeny inMazus pumilus (Scrophulariaceae)

  • Published:
The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

InMazus pumilus, all the floral appendages are initiated in acropetal sequence in the second cell layer (except stamens) of the floral primordium by periclinal divisions. The actinomorphic calyx tube is formed due to zonal growth. The zygomorphy in corolla is evident from the inception of petal primordia which arise sequentially as independent units in order of one anterior, a pair of anterio-lateral followed by a pair of posterio-lateral. Later these primordia exhibit differential growth because of which zygomorphy becomes more pronounced. The upper corolla tube is formed by interprimordial growth and lower corolla tube by zonal growth. Stamens are initiated in the third layer of the floral apex. Unlike sepals and petals, in the development of stamens (4) underlying cells of corpus also contribute. Posterior stamen is absent. The stamens become epipetalous because of interprimordial and zonal growth in the common region below the bases of petals as well as stamens. The two carpel primordia arise as crescent shaped structures which become continuous due to interprimordial growth. The ovary is formed by a ring of zonal meristem. The style develops later between stigma and ovary because of intercalary growth. The residual apex grows vertically along with the ovary and forms the septum of the ovary. All the floral appendages exhibit similar pattern of histogenesis and early growth suggesting thereby the appendicular nature of these appendages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Awasthi, D.K., V. Kumar andY.S. Murty. 1984. Flower development inAntirrhinum majus L. (Scrophulariaceae) with a comment upon corolla tube formation. Bot. Mag. Tokyo97: 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boke, N.H. 1948. Development of the perianth inVinca rosea L. Amer. J. Bot.35: 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1949. Development of the stamens and carpels inVinca rosea L. Amer. J. Bot.36: 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusick, F. 1966. On phylogenetic and ontogenetic fusions.In E.G. Cutter, ed., Trends in Plant Morphogenesis, pp. 170–183. Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, E. andR. Sattler. 1978. Development of perianth tubes ofSolanum dulcamara: Implications for comparative morphology. Phytomorphology28: 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A.J. 1961. Morphology of the Angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engard, C.J. 1944. Organogenesis inRubus. Univ. Hawaii Res. Publ. 21.

  • Esau, K. 1965. Plant Anatomy, 2 ed. John Willey and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, E.M., Jr. 1951. Early ontogeny of the foliage leaf inDrimys winteri var.Chilensis. Amer. J. Bot.38: 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, W. 1970. Studien Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Angiospermen Blatter. Bot. Jahrb.90: 297–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara, N. 1957. On the types of the marginal growth in Dicotyledonous foliage leaves. Bot. Mag. Tokyo.70: 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1959. Marginal growth in leaves. Nature.183: 1409–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartl, D. 1956. Morphologische studien am Pistil des Scrophulariaceen. Osterr. Bot. Ztschr.103: 185–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.R. 1967. Floral morphology, organogenesis and interpretation of the inferior ovary inDowningia bacigalupii. Amer. J. Bot.54: 1274–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1968a. Structure and development to the perianth inDowningia bacigalupii. Amer. J. Bot.55: 406–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1968b. Histogenesis of the androecium and gynoecium inDowningia bacigalupii. Amer. J. Bot.55: 933–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasalpligil, B. 1951. Morophological and ontogenetic studies ofUmbellularia californica Nutt. andLaurus nobilis L. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.25: 115–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaussmann, B. 1941. Vergleichende Untersuchungen Über die Blattnature der Kelch, Blumen, und Staubblätter. Bot. Arch.42: 503–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins, P. andV. Gemmeke, 1979. Infloreszenz- und Blütenentwicklung bei der KugeldistelEchinops exaltatus (Asteraceae). Pl. Syst. Evol.132: 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, R.W. 1940. Floral organogenesis inFrasera caroliniensis. Amer. J. Bot.27: 600–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H.A. andR.H. Wetmore. 1946. Studies in the developmental anatomy ofPhlox drummondii Hook. III. The apices of mature plant. Amer. J. Bot.33: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishino, E. 1976. Developmental anatomy of foliage leaves, bracts, calyx and corolla inPharbitis nil. Bot. Mag. Tokyo89: 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1978. Corolla tube formation in four species of Solanaceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo91: 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1982. Corolla tube formation in six species of Apocynaceae. Bot. Mag. Tokyo95: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1983a. Corolla tube formation in the Tubiflorace and Gentianales. Bot. Mag. Tokyo96: 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1983b. Corolla tube formation in the Primulaceae and Ericales. Bot. Mag. Tokyo96: 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri, V. 1952. Placentation in angiosperms. Bot. Rev.18: 603–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robyns, A. 1955. Morphologie en morphogenese van het bloemapparat bijCentaurium minus car. en.,C. vulgare Rafn. Varhandl. kon. Vlaamse. Acad. Wetensch. Let. Schone Kunst. Van Palgië Klasse Westensch.51: 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, R. 1977. Kronrohrenentstechung beiSolanum dulcamara L. und “Kongenitale Verwachsung”. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.90: 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. 1979. Early floral development inDigitalis purpurea L. Phytomorphology29: 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andD.K. Jain. 1979. Floral organogenesis ofAntirrhinum majus L. (Scrophulariaceae). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.88: 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprotte, K. 1940. Untersuchungen über Wachstum und Nervatur der Fruchtblätter. Bot. Arch.40: 463–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A.D. 1959. Die Evolution der Angiospermen. Gustav Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1969. Flowering Plants: Origin and Dispersal. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepfer, S.S. 1953. Floral anatomy and ontogeny inAquilegia formosa var.truncata andRanunculus repens. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.25: 513–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, S.C. 1959. Ontogeny of the influrescence and the flower inDrimys winteri var.chilensis. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.30: 257–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • — andE.M. Gifford Jr. 1966. Organogenesis in the carpellate flower ofDrimys lanceolata. Amer. J. Bot.53: 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, T.M. 1969. Morphological studies in the family-Scrophulariaceae. Ph. D. Thesis, Agra University, Agra, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, W. 1959. Die Phylogenie der Planzen. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rawat, R., Awasthi, D.K. & Kumar, V. Floral ontogeny inMazus pumilus (Scrophulariaceae). Bot. Mag. Tokyo 101, 459–471 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488088

Key words

Navigation