Skip to main content
Log in

Large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows: Physical aspects and research trends

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current paper, we have primarily addressed one powerful simulation tool developed during the last decades—Large Eddy Simulation (LES), which is most suitable for unsteady three-dimensional complex turbulent flows in industry and natural environment. The main point in LES is that the large-scale motion is resolved while the small-scale motion is modeled or, in geophysical terminology, parameterized. With a view to devising a subgrid-scale(SGS) model of high quality, we have highlighted analyzing physical aspects in scale interaction and energy transfer such as dissipation, backscatter, local and non-local interaction, anisotropy and resolution requirement. They are the factors responsible for where the advantages and disadvantages in existing SGS models come from. A case study on LES of turbulence in vegetative canopy is presented to illustrate that LES model is more based on physical arguments. Then, varieties of challenging complex turbulent flows in both industry and geophysical fields in the near future are presented. In conclusion, we may say with confidence that new century shall see the flourish in the research of turbulence with the aid of LES combined with other approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moin P. Direct and large eddy simulation of turbulence. In: J.L. Lumley et al. eds, Research Trends in Fluid Dynamics, AIP Press, 1996. 188–193

  2. Moin P. Tackling turbulence with supercomputers.Scient Amer, 1997, 276(1): 62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spalart PR. Strategies for turbulence modeling and simulation.Private Communication, 1997

  4. Zhou Y. Advances in the fundamental aspects of turbulence transfer, interacting scales and self-preservation in isotropic decay.Appl Mech Rev, 1998, 51(4): 267–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deardorff JW. Convective velocity and temperature scales for the unstable planetary boundary layer and for Rayleigh convection.J Atmos Sci, 1970, 27: 1211–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Galperin B, Orszag SA. Large Eddy Simulation of Complex Engineering and Geophysical Flows. Cambridge University Press, 1993

  7. Piomelli U. Large eddy simulation: achievements and challenges. In: Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1999. 335–362

  8. Su MD, Kang QJ. Large eddy simulation of the turbulence flow around a circular cylinder at subcritical Reynolds number.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1999, 31 (1): 100–105

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yan H, Su MD. Application of simulated small scale model in turbulent round jet flows.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2000, 32(5): 513–522

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li JC, Xie ZT. Large eddy simulation for canopy turbulent flows.Acta Mechanica sinica, 1999, 31(5): 406–414

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Cui GX, et al. Transportation of passive scalar in inhomogeneous turbulence.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2000, 16(1): 21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu XY. Numerical study of an oscillatory turbulent flow over a flat plate.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1999, 15(1): 8–14

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu XY, Zhuang LX. Numerical study of natural convection in a vertical slot.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1999, 15(3): 215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pope SB. Turbulent Flows. London: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 558–640

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Meneveau C, Katz J. Scale invariant and turbulence models for large eddy simulation.Ann Rev Fluid Mech, 2000, 32: 1–32

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Smagoringsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations, I. The basic experiment.Mon Weather Rev, 1963, 91: 99

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baggett JS, Jimenez J, Kravchenko AG. Resolution requirements in large-eddy simulations of shear flows. Annual Research Briefs, CTR, Stanford University, 1997. 51–66

  18. Gong H, Chen S, He GW. An analysis of subgrid-scale interaction with use of results from direct numerical simulations.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1999, 15(2): 108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hartel C, Kleiser L. Analysis and modeling of subgrid-scale motions in near-wall turbulence.J Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 356, 327–352

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Bardina J, Ferziger JH, Reynolds WC. Improved subgrid model for large eddy simulation. AIAA Paper, 1980. 80–1357

  21. Liu S, Meneveau C, Katz J. On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet.J Fluid Mech, 1994, 275: 83–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Domaradzki JA, Saiki EM. A subgrid-scale model based on the estimation of unsolved scales of turbulence.Phys Fluid, 1997, 9(7): 2148–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kerr RM, Domaradzki JA, Barbier G. Small scale properties of nonlinear interaction and subgrid scale energy transfer in isotropic turbulence.Phys Fluids, 1996, 8: 197

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kraichnan RH. Eddy viscosity in two and three dimensions.J Atmos Sci, 1976, 33: 1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Domaradzki JA, Liu W, Barbier G. An analysis of subgrid scale interaction in numerically simulated isotropic turbulence.Phys Fluids 1993, 5: 1747

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Marion M, Temma R. Nonlinear Galerkin methods.SIAM J, Numer Anal, 1989, 26(5): 1139–1157

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Cabot W. Wall models in large eddy simulation of separated flow. 1997. 97–106

  28. Deardorff JW. The numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers.J Fluid Mech, 1970, 41: 453–480

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Baggett JS. Some modeling requirements for wall models in large eddy simulation. 1997: 123–134

  30. Wang M. Dynamic wall modeling for LES of complex turbulent flows. Annual Research Briefs, CTR, Stanford University, 2000. 241–250

  31. Moeng C-H. A large eddy simulation model for the study of planetary boundary layer turbulence.J Atmos Sci, 1984, 41(13): 2052–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lesieu M, Metais O. New trends in large eddy simulation of turbulence.Ann Rev Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 28: 15–82

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shaw RH, Schumaann U. Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest.Boud Layer Meteo, 1992, 61: 47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shaw RH, et al. Influence of foliar density and thermal stability on profiles of Reynolds stress and turbulence intensity in a deciduous forest.Bound Layer Meteo, 1988, 45: 391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Patton EG. Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow within and above a plant canopy. Doctorial dissertation of the University of California, 1997

  36. Gao W, et al. Observation of organized structure in turbulent flow within and above a forest canopy.Bound Layer Meteo, 1989, 47: 349–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The NSAF project supported by the NSFC and the Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics (10176032)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiachun, L. Large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows: Physical aspects and research trends. Acta Mech Sinica 17, 289–301 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02487457

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02487457

Key Words

Navigation