Skip to main content
Log in

Construction of polynomial matrix using block coefficient matrix representation auto-regressive moving average model for actively controlled structures

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The polynomial matrix using the block coefficient matrix representation auto-regressive moving average (referred to as the PM-ARMA) model is constructed in this paper for actively controlled multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) structures with time-delay through equivalently transforming the preliminary state space realization into the new state space realization. The PM-ARMA model is a more general formulation with respect to the polynomial using the coefficient representation auto-regressive moving average (ARMA) model due to its capability to cope with actively controlled structures with any given structural degrees of freedom and any chosen number of sensors and actuators. (The sensors and actuators are required to maintain the identical number.) under any dimensional stationary stochastic excitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Housner GW, Bergman LA, Caughey TK, et al. Structural control: past, present, and future.J Engl Mech, 1997, 123(9): 897–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spenser BF, Sain MK. Controlling buildings: a new frontier in feedback.IEEE Control. Syst Mag, 1997, 17: 19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Åström KJ. Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1970

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Åström KJ. Theory and applications of self tuning regulators.Automatica, 1977, 13: 457–476

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gawthrop PJ. Some interpretations of self tuning controller.Proceedings of the IEEE, 1977, 124: 889–894

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke DW. Introduction to self tuning controller. In: Nichelson H, Swanick BH, eds. IEEE, Control Engineering Series 15, Self Tuning and Adaptive Control: Theory and Applications, London: Peter Pereginus, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke DW. Self tuning control of non-minimum phase systems.Automatica, 1984, 20: 501–517

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Athans M. The role and the use of the stochastic linear-quadratic-Gaussian problem in control system design.IEEE Trans Automat Contr, 1971, AC-16: 529–552

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Yong LP, Mickleborough NC. Model identification of vibrating structures using ARMA model.J Eng Mech, 1989, 115(10): 2232–2250

    Google Scholar 

  10. Safak E. Adaptive modelling, identification, and control of dynamics systems. I: Theory.J Eng Mech, 1989, 115(11): 2386–2405

    Google Scholar 

  11. Loh CH, Lin HM. Application of off-line and on-line identification techniques to buildings seismic response data.Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 1996, 25: 269–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Spanos PD, Zeldin BA. Efficient iterative ARMA approximation of multivariate random processes for structural dynamics applications.Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 1996, 25: 497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Enrique LJ. A simple model for structural control including soil-structure interaction effects.Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 1998, 27: 225–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoshiya M, Saito Y. Prediction control of SDOF system.J Eng Mech, 1995, 121 (10): 1049–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamada K, Kobori T. Control algorithm for estimating future responses of active variable stiffness structure.Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 1995, 24: 1085–1099

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keyhani A, Allam MM. Closed loop predictive optimal control algorithm using ARMA models.J Eng Mech, 2000, 126(6): 620–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guenfal L, Djebiri M, Boucherit MS, et al. Generalized minimum variance control for buildings under seismic ground motion.Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 2001, 30: 945–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Samaras E, Shinozuka M, Tsurui A. ARMA representation of random processes.J Eng Mech, 1985, 111(3): 449–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Spanos PD, Mignolet MC. Z-transformation modeling of P-M spectrum.J Eng Mech 1986, 112(8): 745–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Y, Kareem, A. ARMA modeling of random wind and wave fields. In: Eng Mech-6th Conf, Abstracts, ASCE, New York, NY, 1987

  21. Li Y, Kareem A. Recursive modeling of dynamics systems.J Eng Mech, 1990, 116(3): 660–679

    Google Scholar 

  22. Owen JS, Eccles BJ, Choo BS, et al. The application of auto-regressive time series modelling for the time-frequency analysis of civil engineering structures.Eng Struct, 2001, 23: 521–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Neild SA, Mcfadden PD, Williams MS. A review of time-frequency methods for structural vibration analysis.Eng Struct, 2003, 25: 713–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50278054)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chunxiang, L., Dai, Z. Construction of polynomial matrix using block coefficient matrix representation auto-regressive moving average model for actively controlled structures. Acta Mech Sinica 20, 661–667 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02485870

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02485870

Key Words

Navigation